RE: A question of NDR

2002-11-18 Thread Tim Ault
Seems to be the case. Thanks, Chris. I'll alert the user to the happy news. ..sakes. Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR PFs don't do NDRs

RE: A question of NDR

2002-11-14 Thread Drew Nicholson
, 2002 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR Your attitude is apparently by design as well. Like I said, if you send an email from within Outlook in the manner you described , I believe it works that way by design . If I am wrong, so be it. -Original

RE: A question of NDR

2002-11-13 Thread Andy David
By design I believe. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A question of NDR Scenario: mailbox1 has user permission against mailbox2. mailbox1 sends messages from within mailbox1 with

RE: A question of NDR

2002-11-13 Thread Andy David
If you know all the answers, why are you asking us? -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR oh come on, andy.. test the accuracy of your reply send a message from

RE: A question of NDR

2002-11-13 Thread Tim Ault
reply. Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR If you know all the answers, why are you asking us? -Original Message- From: Tim Ault

RE: A question of NDR

2002-11-13 Thread Roger Seielstad
Which Outlook version? I just did some testing with Outlook XP and it works correctly - NDRs return to mailbox2. Further explain what you're seeing, and also look at the headers to see what's going out. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems

RE: A question of NDR

2002-11-13 Thread Andy David
13, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR of course not. and what's with the non-sequitor..? in my first post on the issue I question what I believe is unusual behavior. you claim the behavior is by design. in my second post, I challenge your claim. geez.. if you

RE: A question of NDR

2002-11-13 Thread Roger Seielstad
. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR oh come on, andy.. test

RE: A question of NDR

2002-11-13 Thread Daniel Chenault
That is correct; the message is sent on behalf of mailbox2 (as seen in the headers). The NDR goes the to _original_ sender. It makes sense: Secretary has user permissions on her boss' inbox. Secretary sends message on his behalf to other user(s). Message bounces. Who needs to know to resend the

RE: A question of NDR

2002-11-13 Thread Darcy Adams
In Outlook2000 the reply to field defaults to the primary mailbox. You can set that to whatever you want on an individual message basis. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 5:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A

RE: A question of NDR

2002-11-13 Thread Tim Ault
, November 13, 2002 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR Which Outlook version? I just did some testing with Outlook XP and it works correctly - NDRs return to mailbox2. Further explain what you're seeing, and also look at the headers to see what's going out

RE: A question of NDR

2002-11-13 Thread Roger Seielstad
-Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR perzaktly.. thanx roger. Your experienced is (I believe) the normal and expected behavior. However, a user working

RE: A question of NDR

2002-11-13 Thread Tim Ault
' with the address of the mailbox of origin (mailbox1), and the From address of mailbox2. Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:danielc;dc-resources.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR That is correct

RE: A question of NDR

2002-11-13 Thread Tim Ault
-Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR In Outlook2000 the reply to field defaults to the primary mailbox. You can set that to whatever you want

RE: A question of NDR

2002-11-13 Thread Tim Ault
the culprit. Off to RFC822 to learn about this header item.. Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR You mean like this, which worked

RE: A question of NDR

2002-11-13 Thread East, Bill
To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR Your attitude is apparently by design as well. Like I said, if you send an email from within Outlook in the manner you described , I believe it works that way by design . If I am wrong, so be it. -Original Message

RE: A question of NDR

2002-11-13 Thread Chris Scharff
PFs don't do NDRs. By design. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 11/13/2002 10:37 AM Subject: RE: A question of NDR From the This Just in Dept.: The secondary mailbox is actually a PF against which the user has User permission. The PF is configured