?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 9:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front End Server
A. Insufficient data.
B. Probably, depending on the products in use.
-Original Message-
From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted
9 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Front end Server
>
>
>
> OK,
>
> Any one using an ISA Server in the DMZ connecting to an
> Exchange Server
> through the firewall?
> I have been looking at some technet articles about a "trihomed ISA
> Server
t: RE: Front end Server
I was thinking of eliminating the FE Server if I implement the ISA, and
point to the exchange server directly.
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Thanks for all the info.
Raj
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 4:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front end Server
Read Ken's post a few back on that. I agree with him and have taken that
approa
hange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front end Server
I was thinking of eliminating the FE Server if I implement the ISA, and
point to the exchange server directly.
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Su
I was thinking of eliminating the FE Server if I implement the ISA, and
point to the exchange server directly.
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front end Server
You are
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front end Server
OK,
Any one using an ISA Server in the DMZ connecting to an Exchange Server
through the firewall?
I have
nge Discussions
Subject: RE: Front end Server
OK,
Any one using an ISA Server in the DMZ connecting to an Exchange Server
through the firewall?
I have been looking at some technet articles about a "trihomed ISA
Server in the Perimeter network". Is this a better option?
Thanks for all the i
-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 12:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front end Server
If security is your goal use an ISA Server. FE Exchange Servers are not
security devices, contrary to what you may have been told.
-Origin
We considered doing this, but in the end decided to go with a dedicated
proxy appliance box.
Reasons?
1. Less holes in the firewalls. SSL from the internet, and HTTP to our
existing FE server.
2. The cost of the proxy appliance was comparable to server hardware +
E2K enterprise.
3. Dedicated app
Discussions
Subject: RE: Front end Server
To keep the BE server secure ( do not want to open the OWA ports to
users who are not using VPN and dialup). Also we have a document
management software (imanage) which could be integrated to Outlook.
Since the users access the Imanage web portal via the web
AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front end Server
512MB.
Thanks Ed.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 12:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front end Server
I would give it a try. You didn't say how much me
512MB.
Thanks Ed.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 12:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front end Server
I would give it a try. You didn't say how much memory is in it,
however. Be sure that there
I would give it a try. You didn't say how much memory is in it,
however. Be sure that there's enough.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
via owa (secured with SSL).
Any other suggestions would be welcome.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front end Server
Why do you think you need a FE server
Why do you think you need a FE server?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front end Server
One Exchange Server, 200 mailboxes
-Original
One Exchange Server, 200 mailboxes
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front end Server
How many Exchange Servers, protocols and mailboxes will this FE Server
be
load
How many Exchange Servers, protocols and mailboxes will this FE Server be
load balancing?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Front end Server
Dear Al
Your tests are correct.
> -Original Message-
> From: Patterson, Norman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 6:09 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Front end server to 5.5 back end
>
> Is it possible to use an Ex 2000 front end server to proxy POP/IMAP
> connec
OK, that's what I wanted to hear. I haven't tried this yet myself,
and wasn't sure if it was a known issue. My colleague did open a
support call, and hopefully we'll know soon if it is environment
specific or an architecture issue.
Thanks David for your responses.
Cheers all,
Karen
On Mon, 7
ed if Microsoft doesn't get the data on it.
David
-Original Message-
From: Karen McLaughlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front-end server problem
Thanks for your reply, David. I understand this much better no
Thanks for your reply, David. I understand this much better now,
but the one question that remains is whether having SMTP Connectors
on front-end servers is a good idea. I know one person who repeatedly
has problems with inetinfo crashing.
Has anyone else seen this, and suggestions to resolve?
Here are the facts:
- The setting on an Exchange server "This is a Front End Server" in ESM
has no effect on SMTP. It only affects POP, IMAP, and HTTP. The design
of Exchange is that all Exchange servers are inbound servers for SMTP.
Outbound SMTP is controlled via SMTP Connectors.
- Some peop
If you're referring to Exchange 2000, I wouldn't necessarily create
front-end servers just for SMTP. I'd use the SMTP service that comes
with IIS to relay SMTP. You can use front-end servers for HTTP, IMAP
and POP, though.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corp
24 matches
Mail list logo
