0 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Full access
>
>
> CSVDE (thanks William) won't do what you need?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 3:41 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
&
IIRC you can't use csvde to modify objects, it can only be used to create or
delete.
> -Original Message-
> From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 16 April 2002 01:00
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Full access
>
>
> CSVDE (than
That's when Word search/replace comes in handy
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 15 April 2002 23:41
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Full access
>
>
> Excel does not help with LDIFDE though :(
>
Any of a 100 spreadsheet apps do the same thing. :o)
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 5:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Actually, ExMerge is second on my most needed Exchange tool list.
Excel is
CSVDE (thanks William) won't do what you need?
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Excel does not help with LDIFDE though :(
I have to write batch files to pars
Excel does not help with LDIFDE though :(
I have to write batch files to parse the LDF exports
-Original Message-
From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 12:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
I've grown to love that Te
I've grown to love that Text to Columns feature...
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 5:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Actually, ExMerge is second on my most needed Exchange tool list.
Excel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:13 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Full access
>
>
> Yes, the mellow ones are when I don't hit send.
>
> I didn't even get into the exporting of bad messages, or
> suspected virus-laden m
Subject: RE: Full access
And we havent even gotten to discussing Arkanserve yet! ;)
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Yes, the mellow ones are when I don't hit sen
I am cute dammit!
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Yes, the mellow ones are when I don't hit send.
I didn't even get into the exporting of bad me
And we havent even gotten to discussing Arkanserve yet! ;)
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Yes, the mellow ones are when I don't hit send.
I didn'
don't buy into Mr Strome's subtle self-depricating cute humbleness.
He is very capable.
And I AM being mellow, Damnit!
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Have y
Subject: RE: Full access
Proactive Exmerge? Is that sort of like BLBs?
Original message
>Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 15:40:43 -0400
>From: Andrey Fyodorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Full access
>To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
-8293 - Direct
(336) 516-4519 - Mobile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - email
http://www.tripathimaging.com
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 3:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Exchange 2000 does not have a service ac
Proactive Exmerge? Is that sort of like BLBs?
Original message
>Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 15:40:43 -0400
>From: Andrey Fyodorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Full access
>To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>So have I. Since t
6:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
I started with 5.0. I've used ExMerge consistently on production boxes. It
is a valuable tool.
You've never walked into a client that had setup an otherwise decent
Exchange installation, but used a recipients container per
hange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Then use the service account. I would imagine, all the access needed it
there.
And how often does one run Exmerge?
Don Ely
Network Engineer
Tripath Imaging, Inc.
(336) 290-8293 - Direct
(336) 516-4519 - M
Thats just plain sad.
Original message
>Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 15:39:21 -0400
>From: Andrey Fyodorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Full access
>To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>One of my customers wants to have thei
PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
My guess is she has minions do it.
-Original Message-
From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
You have the great fortune of knowing what y
One of my customers wants to have their mailboxes exported to PSTs every
day. They just want to keep these PSTs handy, just in case.
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Full access
What if I need to run ExMerge export every day?
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
?!?! If and when that needs to occur, you set the permissions appropriately
at that
ripathimaging.com
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 3:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Don Ely?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 200
Don Ely?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
If someone's mailbox is ever tampered with, who do you think they will
suspect first?
-Original Message-
If someone's mailbox is ever tampered with, who do you think they will
suspect first?
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Resource Mailboxes that hang on co
Have you never been mellow?
Have you never tried?
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
I started with 5.0. I've used ExMerge consistently on production boxes
]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
And probably a cigarette afterwards.
Original message
>Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:20:27 -0700
>From: William Lefkovics <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Full access
>To: &qu
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
He is rather cute in those Panda overalls.
Original message
>Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 07:28:49 -0700
>From: Doug Hampshire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Ful
ROFLMAO!!! Oh, jeez. . . that's an image I won't forget for a while.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
He is rather cute in those Panda overalls.
---
He is rather cute in those Panda overalls.
Original message
>Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 07:28:49 -0700
>From: Doug Hampshire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Full access
>To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>That's why we
That's why we got him GAnimals. He can pick the giraffe label pants and
know that the giraffe label shirt will match it.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
D]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:32 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Full access
>
>
> Yikes I'm with Missy on this one. I have been doing exchange
> since it was a fledgling beta called 4.0 I have never had
> any reason to do an ExMerge on a pr
3 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Full access
>
>
> Beyond SSM status. Roger? I demand to see the test results.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:02 PM
>
And probably a cigarette afterwards.
Original message
>Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:20:27 -0700
>From: William Lefkovics <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Full access
>To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Oh... Don wil
gement meetings"
> -Original Message-
> From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 11 April 2002 22:49
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Full access
>
>
> You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing...
>
>
> -Original Me
Oh... Don will need a few beers before the fist round.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 5:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Full access
OK. I see you at MEC2002 and I pay the fist round.
/Peter
- Original
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Full access
OK. I see you at MEC2002 and I pay the fist round.
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: "Ely, Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMA
OK. I see you at MEC2002 and I pay the fist round.
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: "Ely, Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:03 PM
Subject: RE: Full access
>
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Full access
OK, OK I need a beer.
Don, we have a draw here :)
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Meunier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROT
, April 11, 2002 7:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Recipient containers in E2K?
(sorry, I just had to...)
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Thursday, April 11, 2002 05:53 PM
> Posted To: MSExchange
OK, OK I need a beer.
Don, we have a draw here :)
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Meunier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:04 PM
Subject: RE: Full access
Recipient container
Recipient containers in E2K?
(sorry, I just had to...)
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Thursday, April 11, 2002 05:53 PM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: Full access
> Subject: Re: Full access
>
Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Full access
Service account in E2K ?
I can think of a couple of scenarios when one need to use exmerge on a
production box: 1. User A is transferred from site A to site B 2. The
pre
:)
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
I started with 5.0. I've used ExMerge consistently on production boxes. It
is a valuable tool.
You've never walked into a clien
From: "Ely, Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:38 PM
Subject: RE: Full access
> Then use the service account. I would imagine, all the access needed it
> th
: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
It's my brick-level backup solution [1] ;)
[1] backup solution? sounds like something you drink for constipation
relief.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, Apr
;m glad you never had a reason to. Are you still on 4.0? Just kidding.
William
-Original Message-
From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Yikes I'm with Missy on this one. I have
It's my brick-level backup solution [1] ;)
[1] backup solution? sounds like something you drink for constipation
relief.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
The
://www.tripathimaging.com
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you
need to have full
PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
My guess is she has minions do it.
-Original Message-
From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
You have the great fortune of knowing what you
My guess is she has minions do it.
-Original Message-
From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing...
-Original Message-
I exmerged out of my production box twice to fix corruption problems, both
times per PSS. No big deal.
> -Original Message-
> From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Full access
Knowing what she's doing. Missy? I want to see the test scores.
> -Original Message-
> From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:49 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Full access
>
>
> You have the great f
Is this the 6'4" built-like-a-NFL-linebacker Mr. Seielstad you're talking
about?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Doug Hampshire
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
T
You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing...
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Full access
Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge
d use of
that account should also be limited to the smallest possible group.
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:17 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Full access
>
>
> Sometimes you n
t: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM
Subject: RE: Full access
Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when
you
need to have full access to everyone's mailbox.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11
?!?! If and when that needs to occur, you set the permissions appropriately
at that time.
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:17 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Full access
>
>
Which is a completely different situation.
Original message
>Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 16:16:47 -0400
>From: Andrey Fyodorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Full access
>To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Sometimes you nee
Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you
need to have full access to everyone's mailbox.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ful
For mailboxes, go to the properties of the information store, go to
Security, explicitly allow the last two security options to the
administrator's account (they are inherited as Deny). Wait 10 minutes or
reboot the server.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
Subject: Re: Full access
You have a short memory, Scharff. Roger is definitely *not* shaven!
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:33 PM
Subject: RE:
I for one am proud of the fact I was able to block that particular memory
from my mind. Gave me nightmares for weeks.
> -Original Message-
> From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:37 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject:
You have a short memory, Scharff. Roger is definitely *not* shaven!
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:33 PM
Subject: RE: Full access
Beyond SS
Beyond SSM status. Roger? I demand to see the test results.
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:02 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Full access
>
>
> The talented and ever
al Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Whoopie, I have one. Me. I support 6 sites (soon to drop to 4) with about
5K mailboxes.
I'm not saying don't ever do it, just don&
: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Resource Mailboxes that hang on corrupt meeting requests, OOO, Executives
who forget a lot, misc. I don't understand what the big deal is about
giving select few full access?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
d the recipient.
And so forth...
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Resource Mailboxes that hang on corrupt meeting requests, OOO, Executives
who forget a lot, misc. I don&
s plenty of ways to
figure things out without doing that.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
We contantly need access to everyones mailboxes for many purposes. How els
PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Why do you constantly need access?
For what purposes? Just curious mind you.
Original message
>Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 14:23:59 -0400
>From: "Woodruff, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Full access
>T
Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Why is this a bad design?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183
April 11, 2002 2:02 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Full access
>
>
> The talented and ever popular Mr. Seielstad is neither my
> boss, nor a C-Level exec. And he has graduated beyond SSM
> status. He can actually get dressed all by himself now each morning.
>
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
ShavedSeielstad.exe?
Original message
>Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:38:20 -0700
>From: Doug Hampshire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Full access
>To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
7 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Full access
>
>
> ShavedSeielstad.exe?
>
>
> Original message
> >Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:38:20 -0700
> >From: Doug Hampshire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: RE: Full access
> >To:
www.dice.com
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C-level exec's
mailboxes then.
-Origin
ShavedSeielstad.exe?
Original message
>Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:38:20 -0700
>From: Doug Hampshire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Full access
>To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>But how am I supposed to monitor my boss&
But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C-level exec's
mailboxes then.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Runs counter to several thin
essage-
> From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Full access
>
>
> Why is this a bad design?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
Why is this a bad design?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll
skip the diatribe on w
Andy says it is Q262054.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:54 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Full access
>
>
> That was answered this morning. Q258183
>
> > --
That was answered this morning. Q258183
> -Original Message-
> From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:46 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Full access
>
>
> What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and
> Ma
Why would you want to do that?
Anyway: Q262054
Original message
>Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 12:46:09 -0400
>From: "Woodruff, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Full access
>To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to
Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll
skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies.
> -Original Message-
> From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM
> To: Exchange Discussion
82 matches
Mail list logo
