-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 19 August 2002 11:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Global Address Lists
No problem, it was a Saturday and I wasn't feeling overly verbose. :)
> -Original Message-
> From:
nt: Friday, August 16, 2002 6:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Global Address Lists
Depending on the Exchange installation, potentially LOTS, especially in a
hosting environment. We used restricted ABV views when I worked at $vbc for
other political reasons.
> -Original Message-
gs
within ou's, not the ou itself.
Again, thanks, everyone. Lots of help.
Wendy
- Original Message -
From: "prontomail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: Globa
Elsewhere in this thread are links to resources on the subject.
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Patti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 8:08 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Global Address Lists
>
> How did you create mutiple G
PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Global Address Lists
In our case, we create multiple GALs, one for each company we host.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, Aug
i got the hint. thanks for the clarification.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 8:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Global Address Lists
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Crump, Jay
To: Exchange Discussions
In our case, we create multiple GALs, one for each company we host.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 3:17 PM
Subject: RE: Global Address Lis
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Crump, Jay
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 8/17/2002 5:42 PM
Subject: RE: Global Address Lists
I did offer 2 different scenarios.
You don't see reason why not for. which one.
"do not mount store" or delete.
-Original Message--
I did offer 2 different scenarios.
You don't see reason why not for. which one.
"do not mount store" or delete.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 5:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Globa
Offhand, I don't see any reason why not.
-Original Message-
From: Crump, Jay
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 8/17/2002 9:46 AM
Subject: RE: Global Address Lists
Another question for Chris or anyone else that can help. Default
mailbox stores when running Enterprise edition E2K
nly basic e-mail access, and giving them
access to the entire GAL represents a security risk.
[1] _Thankfully_ this example is not something I was ever forced to
implement for my or any other company, but I know it's been done.
-Original Message-
From: Crump, Jay
To: Exchange Discussions
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 7:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Global Address Lists
Restricting address book views will not keep users from using owa, nor
will it keep owa users from searching the entire global address list.
The restricted address book views in ESM only apply
al Message-
From: Wendy Reetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 4:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Global Address Lists
Thank you all for your quick responses.
If restricting the view in the GC restricted the object access, wouldn't
that mean I shouldn'
presents a security risk.
[1] _Thankfully_ this example is not something I was ever forced to
implement for my or any other company, but I know it's been done.
-Original Message-
From: Crump, Jay
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 8/16/2002 5:28 PM
Subject: RE: Global Address Lists
I to
;Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 6:31 PM
Subject: RE: Global Address Lists
> I lost you after the beautiful part.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 3:16
I lost you after the beautiful part.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 3:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Global Address Lists
Well, OK. I think you are correct that if you don't have rights to view the
o
o see.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 6:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Global Address Lists
Depending on the Exchange installation, potentially LOTS, especially in a
hosting environment. We used restricted ABV views w
6 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Global Address Lists
>
> what's wrong with seeing the default GAL?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 6:12 PM
> To: Exchange Discus
s sufficient
to restrict the ability to view an object in AD (through other means).
> -Original Message-
> From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 5:12 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Global Address Lists
>
> The DN
what's wrong with seeing the default GAL?
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 6:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Global Address Lists
The DN thingy didn't work for me. I'm not cha
The DN thingy didn't work for me. I'm not changing my answer. :)
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 3:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Global Address Lists
Sort of. :)
> -Original Message-
Sort of. :)
> -Original Message-
> From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 5:10 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Global Address Lists
>
> Add them to the NewGal group?? I don't see the problem. Are you
>
Add them to the NewGal group?? I don't see the problem. Are you suggesting
that you do not want to add them to this group and you need another way for
the person outside of the group to be able to logon?
If the mapi user does not have rights to view their user object within the
global catalog t
x27;t wait to
answer this question 47 times at MEC.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 4:59 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Global Address Lists
>
> The Exchange provisioning whitepaper at www.microsoft.com/isn and
Sort of. :)
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 4:56 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Global Address Lists
>
> Outlook searches the GAL for a match when it is trying to resolve the
The Exchange provisioning whitepaper at www.microsoft.com/isn and I think
one article by David Sengupta (same source as last time) go into some detail
in setting up restricted address book views in E2K.
Without the ability to view an address list in which their mailbox appeared,
a user would hav
Outlook searches the GAL for a match when it is trying to resolve the user. User must
be visible in a GAL.
-Original Message-
From: Wendy Reetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 5:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Global Address Lists
In E2K if I hide User
No.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rebecca Ford
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
28 matches
Mail list logo
