RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net

2001-08-29 Thread msharik
what kind of firewall? PIX? UUNet is known as a spam haven, so it's possible that this server is blocking all traffic from them. You could always use the telephone to call the admin of that box & find out. -Michèle Immigration site: Our new 2001 Miata:

RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net

2001-08-29 Thread Couch, Nate
TED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net what kind of firewall? PIX? UUNet is known as a spam haven, so it's possible that this server is blocking all traffic from them. You could always use the telephone to call the ad

RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net

2001-08-29 Thread msharik
ust 29, 2001 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net Michele, We have a Checkpoint firewall on our side. I did try contacting Earthlink and after dealing with them for a while I felt like I had passed through a gauntlet of "no help". Very frustrat

RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net

2001-08-29 Thread Andy David
PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net Michele, We have a Checkpoint firewall on our side. I did try contacting Earthlink and after dealing with them for a while I felt like I had passed through a gauntlet of

Re: IMC problem with Earthlink.net

2001-08-29 Thread Daniel Chenault
I'm betting the Exchange server's advertised name and the IP a reverse lookup renders do not much thus earthlink is kicking it back as spam. - Original Message - From: "Couch, Nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:04 PM

RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net

2001-08-29 Thread Couch, Nate
August 29, 2001 12:41 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net > > Nate, what are the rules you are referring to? > > 2) Based on the rules we have setup on the firewall the messages for > Earthlink are leaving the firewall d

RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net

2001-08-29 Thread Couch, Nate
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net Nate, can you post the full text of your NDR? Also, have you checked MAPS or ORBZ to make sure you're not listed there? -Michèle Immigration site:

RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net

2001-08-29 Thread Chinnery Paul
Nope, not a misnomer. That's what they're called. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net I call them "rules", but this may be a

RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net

2001-08-29 Thread Andy David
Discussions Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net I call them "rules", but this may be a misnomer. They are configuration settings on the firewall which an admin can use to filter traffic to and from the Internet. Nate > -- > From: Andy David > Reply To:

RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net

2001-08-29 Thread East, Bill
1 2:19 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net > > > Here you go Michele. > > === > > Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. > > Subject:fro

RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net

2001-08-29 Thread East, Bill
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:49 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net > > > Nate - you might want to get onto your Exchange server and > telnet to port 25 > of Earthlink's listed MX. If you can walk through an SMTP > con

RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net

2001-08-29 Thread Mike Hoskins
Nate, You might check you DNS cache record to make sure it is updated for earthlink and has an MX listing in the record. Mike Hoskins -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMC problem wi

RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net

2001-08-31 Thread Couch, Nate
1 13:32 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net > > Yes, but what are the rules specifically? Your statement seems to imply > that > your firewall has something unusual setup. > > > > Andy David > J Muller International > >

RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net

2001-08-31 Thread Andy David
start looking. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net Andy, Here is what my firewall admin tells me. Sorry for the del

Re: IMC problem with Earthlink.net

2001-08-31 Thread Daniel Chenault
Ya beat me to it. - Original Message - From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 8:41 AM Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net So the Firewall is relaying the mail? In pr

RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net

2001-08-31 Thread Couch, Nate
- > From: Andy David > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 08:41 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net > > So the Firewall is relaying the mail? > In previous Checkpoint versions (<4.x

RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net

2001-08-31 Thread Andy David
k up on as well... Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net 1) We need the SMTP relay feature for POP access. (All users

RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net

2001-08-31 Thread Couch, Nate
CTED] > Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net > > Well, without sending you on a wild goose chase, I still would focus on > Earthlink's ability to look you up correctly :) > Its too bad you can't get a hold of someone there. > > As to 5) You can resol