I've always found rules in Outlook to be somewhat unreliable at best.
If you're really planning on forwarding all mail sent to mailbox X to internet address
Y, you can set up a custom recipient of address Y (probably hiding it from the GAL)
then use Forwarding Address (under Delivery Options in
s.gov.uk]
Sent: 24 October 2002 16:29
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules
I've always found rules in Outlook to be somewhat unreliable at best.
If you're really planning on forwarding all mail sent to mailbox X to
internet address Y, you can set up a custom recipient o
]>
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:47 AM
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules
> If the rule "doesn't do anything", then there are a number possibilities:
> 1. Rules don't work. Restart Outlook with a /ClearRules parameter (which
> doesn't exist!, but there is one si
Can be is not an option. Has to be is how it works.
- Original Message -
From: "David McSpadden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 7:07 AM
Subject: Re: Outlook Rules
> Outlook 200
Chances are you have automatic forwarding to the internet disabled on your
IMS. That's a good thing.
If it needs to go to two addresses, use a DL pointing to your mailbox and to
a custom receipient with the foreign address.
--
Roger D. Seielstad
Outlook 2000. Yes it can be.
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Chenault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 7:02 AM
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules
> Is the client running?
>
>
Is the client running?
-Original Message-
From: David McSpadden [mailto:davidm@;imcu.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 6:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook Rules
I have an Exchange 5.5 sp4 w/IMS running on NT 4.0 sp6a.
My email client is Outlook 2000 on a WinXPsp1.
I a
es, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem
Lori,
I'm currently working on this. I will let you know what happens. I ran it
by my boss and she didn't really seem to care about that sugg
rom: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem
John, you didn't reply to this suggestion, which is by far the best one
you've gotten. Please tell us this is the way you will recommen
: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem
Here's how we handle it:
1. Never allow auto replies to the Internet, you WILL get a mail loop.
2. Allow OOF to the Internet. In theory it can loop, but I have not been
able to find someone that experienced one in the past couple of years
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem
And what happens to you when someone auto-replies to your auto-reply???
BAD IDEA!
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Ne
PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem
Yea but if you use that option. It only allows you to use that when Outlook
is up and running. I want it to come from the server side.
Thanks,
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Cel
OTECTED]>
-Original Message-
From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem
sorry, i forgot you don't want to forward...
The example would be...
1. Check messages when they a
happy, Customer Support is happy, and IT is happy.
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem
I've already told them how I didn't approve. But it doesn&
t right?
J
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem
I'm not going to sit here and argue on why this isn't the right thing to do.
My manager and HR want it d
ssage-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem
I'm not going to sit here and argue on why this isn't the right thing to do.
My manager and HR want it done, so it has to be done.
ge Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
W: 240.453.3575
C: 301.938.6294
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L.
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Pro
That's just hurtful
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem
Who cares what HR wants. They never care what we want! :)
-Original Message-
MAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem
Who cares what HR wants. They never care what we want! :)
-Origin
Who cares what HR wants. They never care what we want! :)
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 7:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem
HR just wants an Auto Reply. I told them the consequences
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 January 2002 15:23
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem
HR just wants an Auto Reply. I told them the consequences and they seem
alright with that, so I'm going to give it to them. And w
Did you stop and restart the IMS after making the change?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem
>HR just wants an Auto Reply. I told them the consequences and they seem
>alright with that, so I'
ry 31, 2002 10:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem
Wouldn't it make more sense to forward the e-mails to the correct person and
let them answer it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bowles, John L.
Sent: Thu
ed At: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:29 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Outlook Rules Problem
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem
Yea I know this is a bad idea. But they want to use this for 30 days
because someone important left the company and they want everyone
sending him email to
Wouldn't it make more sense to forward the e-mails to the correct person and
let them answer it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bowles, John L.
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 7:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook
2002 9:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem
Did you restart the IMS?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 January 200
31, 2002 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem
And what happens to you when someone auto-replies to your auto-reply???
BAD IDEA!
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
> -Original Mess
And what happens to you when someone auto-replies to your auto-reply???
BAD IDEA!
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
> -Original Message-
> From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 31 Janua
Did you restart the IMS?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 January 2002 14:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: FW: Outlook Rules Problem
All,
I'm
30 matches
Mail list logo
