Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
> -Original Message-
> From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 1:14 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: question re pst=bad#7 from the faq
>
>
> In the FAQ under PST=BAD reason 7 is "
per store.
[2] Yes, that's 60.
> -Original Message-
> From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 12:14 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: question re pst=bad#7 from the faq
>
> In the FAQ under PST=BAD reason 7 is "M
Put *that* in your[1] blb and smoke it!
[1] metaphorically speaking of course.
paul
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 1:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: question re pst=bad#7 from the faq
Exactly. In
o: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: question re pst=bad#7 from the faq
Exactly. In Exchange, if I email a 1MB file to 100 people in the company,
that file use 1MB of disk space.
If I do the same email, yet everyone is using PST files, It now consumes
100MB of disk space.
-Original Message---
13, 2002 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: question re pst=bad#7 from the faq
I would bet that on that (4x) .pst file, you have a lots of messages that
refers to the same attachments. Exchange server will take care of it with
SIS, but .pst breaks that.
Andrew
MCSE (W2K & NT4) +
> Posted At: Thursday, June 13, 2002 10:14 AM
> Posted To: ExchangeDiscussion
> Conversation: question re pst=bad#7 from the faq
> Subject: question re pst=bad#7 from the faq
>
>
> In the FAQ under PST=BAD reason 7 is "Messages take up more
> space in a PST t
In the FAQ under PST=BAD reason 7 is "Messages take up more space in a PST
than in an Exchange store." I seem to be finding that that is true but I am
finding some of them taking up something like 4 times as much space which
seems overboard to me. Others only seem to be increasing by about 30% not
But I might need that email someday???
--
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 12:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST=BAD
Yes. Then teach
Yes. Then teach the guy something about email management. And don't let him
tell you he needs it all
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: PST=BAD
Yes. Divide and co
I say break it down more. I wouldn't go over 300MB personally, especially
if he's using Outlook 9x. It is quite unlikely that he needs access to all
2 gigs of email at all times. Give him a new PST as his working copy and
don't have all PSTs active in his profile. Show him how he can open and
Yes. Divide and conquer.
- Original Message -
From: "Aaron Brasslett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 12:07 PM
Subject: PST=BAD
> I thought I would never have to actually post a PST question as I know
> PST=BAD. But I h
11 matches
Mail list logo
