There's no such thing as a 60GB "threshold". Myself, I would look at
the network.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Nope. Give a high enough number, the value reported in the GUI is 0, but the
sort order tells the real story.
-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Paul
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 2/1/2002 9:26 AM
Subject: RE: Strange behavior
The mailboxes that show 0 items have 0 items. They are empty
I have no idea what the 60GB threshold that you're talking about is, but I
do know what the deal is with the mailbox sizes. There's an issue where the
value returned for mailboxes which are greater than 4GB is 0, but Exchange
still knows their 'true' size and sorts them accordingly in the display.
The mailboxes that show 0 items have 0 items. They are empty admin
mailboxes.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange behavior
I had a similar situation. Two users had
I had a similar situation. Two users had mailboxes that had over a million
items in it and the mailbox resources view of total k and # of items always
indicated 0. You need to look at the mailboxes for the two users that show
0 items.
Dot
> -Original Message-
> From: Arnold, Paul [SM
5 matches
Mail list logo
