Re: Relaying in 5.5 and 2k question

2003-03-06 Thread Jerry J.
First of all, thank you for your input. I think that I am getting what I need taken care of for now. I will agree that sub-optimal is not the way to go but for the time being it is a satisfactory workaround. More than half of the legacy systems will not support any kind of authentication to my mail

Re: Relaying in 5.5 and 2k question

2003-03-06 Thread Chris Scharff
Ok[1], well no offense, but I'm not going to extend any effort in my lab trying to make what you want to happen work because sub-optimal was polite-speak for stupid. I'll point you to "Recipient Policies" and let you try and create it again if that's really the route you want to take. Did I mentio

Re: Relaying in 5.5 and 2k question

2003-03-06 Thread Jerry J.
Recreating the thread I felt I needed to do to make some things more clear than what I did earlier. To expand of my scenario, the remote PC is actually 312 remote PC's. So entering their IP addresses is not really an option. Suboptimal will do for now as we are in the process of writing software so

Re: Relaying in 5.5 and 2k question

2003-03-06 Thread Chris Scharff
Starting a new thread on the same topic is probably not as useful as replying to the response(s) to your existing thread. Did you add the IP address of the machine in question as one allowed to relay through your server? The way you'd done it previously was sub-optimal. Rather trying to recreate a

Relaying in 5.5 and 2k question

2003-03-06 Thread Jerry J.
In 5.5 I can set up in the routing tab of the IMS to reroute incoming SMTP mail, sent to whatever domain to relay, overriding relay restrictions even tho the mail is coming from another site. Where is this in 2k? I was able to see some things that were close but not quite what I needed and tinkerin