Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 7:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Closing Outlook doesn't kill process - no pocket pc and
will go back and apply service packs.
"If the machine isn't a laptop, there's no real reason for Offline
Folders anyway"
Disagree. All of my &qu
Let me think of an appropriate response: "get stuffed". Your analogy is
inane and irrelevant.
I'm describing a real-world situation - he's lost the server a couple of
times; he's never lost data. Why should he spend the extra cash for a
backup solution that he wouldn't use? [1]
[1] Disclaimer:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, at 3:04pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> He doesn't take daily backups, and is fully aware that if there's a
> problem, to copy the OST's to PST's, etc. He's never lost a single piece
> of data.
... and I know people who don't ware their seatbelts because they've
"never been i
7;s "cached
Exchange" or "Local Store" mode)
Joe Pochedley
If you have time to do it twice,
you had time to do it right in
the first place.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Wade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 5:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
CTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 5:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Closing Outlook doesn't kill process - no pocket pc and
will go back and apply service packs.
I know the whole setup is a nightmare. If I had my way I would slick
the thing and start it from scratch. I just h
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 2:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Closing Outlook doesn't kill process
I didn't know you could upgrade from Me to W2k.
Anyhoo, Office 2000 with Outlook 2002 sounds like a bad mix to me.
Have you applied all the latest office ser
...and keeping copies of old service packs and hotfixes so you can build
a recovery server at the correct version, and not to mention the
necessity of taking a full backup both before and after applying
updates.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world
Some hotfixes can have this effect as well, which underscores the need for
well documented change control.
> -Original Message-
> From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 2:12 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: E2K Back
This is an interesting situation we just encountered that I thought others
would be interested in.
In our test environment, we recently upgraded one of the E2K servers to SP3.
Afterwards, for various reasons, we needed to go back to an SP2 version of
the database, so we tried to restore the olde
: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Service Packs
One other quick question . . . .
Does best practices dictate re-applying Exchange SP4 after applying Windows
2000 SP3 (or any other OS SP for that matter)?
TIA!
Chris
_
List posting FAQ
PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Service Packs
One other quick question . . . .
Does best practices dictate re-applying Exchange SP4 after applying Windows
2000 SP3 (or any other OS SP for that matter)?
TIA!
Chris
_
List postin
/ service packs
Who he? according to google he could be the creator of:
http://www.fatlaneonline.com/
or he could be the musician who arranged the harmony vocals on The Byrds
'Hey Mr Tambourine Man'
or could he be anything to do with www.simpler-webb.com
I dunno...
-Original Message
--
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 September 2002 16:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: checking version/ service packs
Who he? according to google he could be the creator of:
http://www.fatlaneonline.com/
or he could be the musician who arranged the harmony vocals
rom: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 September 2002 15:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: checking version/ service packs
Make sure you go to MEC this year and wear a nametag that says you're
Dean
Webb. You'll make lots of friends and get in with a good, helpful
EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Hackney
Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 9:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: checking version/ service packs
yup, fairly new to the org and I am the admin... there was no
documentation when I got here so I'm working on that
ECTED]]
Sent: 02 September 2002 13:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: checking version/ service packs
You could also ask the email administrator. Good ones keep notes on this
sort of thing. (Subtle hint to begin documenting everything in sight. If
you're new, it'll make you look incredi
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Hackney
Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 4:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: checking version/ service packs
d'oh...should've tried that!
thanks
-Original Message-
From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 September 200
d'oh...should've tried that!
thanks
-Original Message-
From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 September 2002 10:29
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: checking version/ service packs
Open Exchange System Manager, right click on the server, select
propert
Open Exchange System Manager, right click on the server, select
properties
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 September 2002 09:15 am
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: checking version/ service packs
Not being too familiar
Not being too familiar with my way round exch2k, how can I check what
the version is and which service pack I am using? I've had a look at
the registry: HKLM\software\micorsoft\exchange but nowt there and I've
also run hfnetchk but that only came up with windows 2000 service pack 2
missing.
thank
And make good backups before deploying Service Packs
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
- Original Message -
From: "William Lefkovics" <[EM
Rule of thumb: apply service packs in order of their release.
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris H
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 5:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Service Packs
One other quick question . . . .
Does
One other quick question . . . .
Does best practices dictate re-applying Exchange SP4 after applying Windows
2000 SP3 (or any other OS SP for that matter)?
TIA!
Chris
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_fa
Microsoft! there surely will be SP5.
- Original Message -
From: "McCready, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 5:23 PM
Subject: Exchange Service Packs.
> I hit the Microsoft Web
I hit the Microsoft Webiste and I see there is a patch for OWA that has been
released after Exchange 5.5 Service Pack 4.
I didn't see any other patches. Are there more, and does anybody know if
there will be a Service Pack 5?
Thanks.
Robert
_
None that I have experienced.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Saul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 11:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 Service Packs
I have installed Windows 2000 SP1 and installed Exchange 2000 SP1. Does
anybody know of
I have installed Windows 2000 SP1 and installed Exchange 2000 SP1. Does
anybody know of any problems with Installing Windows SP2 after having
installed Exchange SP1?
Thanks
Saul
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resour
27 matches
Mail list logo
