RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition

2002-01-22 Thread Roger Seielstad
gs. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com > -Original Message- > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 5:00 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject:

RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition

2002-01-21 Thread Ed Crowley
PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition As others have intimated, it is not an easy assessment through a forum like this. As Ed stopped short of saying, perhaps a call to Compaq might be in order. Do they do estimates? I will almost always favour the

RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition

2002-01-21 Thread Blunt, James H (Jim)
onday, January 21, 2002 3:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition Must be some great business need for Ad, Like management promised to have a product implemented that required it, not knowing of the requirement. Something Dilbertish. Milton R Dogg O

RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition

2002-01-21 Thread Milton R Dogg
Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition I concur. But, he did say.."..absolute fastest time.." and provided no details. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition

2002-01-21 Thread Jennifer Baker
I concur. But, he did say.."..absolute fastest time.." and provided no details. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition

RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition

2002-01-21 Thread Blunt, James H (Jim)
Management wants Fast and Well done at this point. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition As others have intimated, it is not an

RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition

2002-01-21 Thread Lefkovics, William
nt: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition William, We are looking at roughly 100 total servers in the domain. Right now in our current NT 4.0 domain, we have our server room with the majority of our servers, about a dozen

RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition

2002-01-21 Thread Martin Blackstone
Plus a box of Gaines Burgers (with a raw egg on them for his shiny coat) -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition REALLY depends on what

RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition

2002-01-21 Thread Milton R Dogg
, 2002 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition Folks, Let's ask a couple of questions, based on the premise of "Money isn't an option": 1. What's the absolute fastest amount of time that it would take to plan an AD/E2K structu

RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition

2002-01-21 Thread Blunt, James H (Jim)
of T-1's. Jim -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition Still depends. Number of users? Number of servers? Locations (differ

RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition

2002-01-21 Thread Blunt, James H (Jim)
tract, in order to get it done quickly. Jim -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition Jim, what you're asking for itself will require a s

RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition

2002-01-21 Thread Blunt, James H (Jim)
PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition Mike, Thanks for that input. Those are things I forgot. 1. Let's assume redundancy. 2. ~1,500 to 2,000 users 3. Give me cost estimates for brand-new vs. migration. 4. It will include a transition at a

RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition

2002-01-21 Thread Ed Crowley
To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition Folks, Let's ask a couple of questions, based on the premise of "Money isn't an option": 1. What's the absolute fastest amount of time that it would take to plan an AD/E2K structure? 2.

RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition

2002-01-21 Thread Ed Crowley
sions Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition Mike, Thanks for that input. Those are things I forgot. 1. Let's assume redundancy. 2. ~1,500 to 2,000 users 3. Give me cost estimates for brand-new vs. migration. 4. It will include a transition at a later date (for exampl

RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition

2002-01-21 Thread Lefkovics, William
: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition Folks, Let's ask a couple of questions, based on the premise of "Money isn't an option": 1. What's th

RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition

2002-01-21 Thread Jennifer Baker
: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition Folks, Let's ask a couple of questions, based on the premise of "Money isn't an option": 1. What's the absolute fastest amount of time that it would take to plan an AD/E2K structure? 2. How long would it take to implement an AD/E2K st

Fw: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition

2002-01-21 Thread Tony Hlabse
OTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]:59 PM Subject: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition > Folks, > > Let's ask a couple of questions, based on the premise of "Money isn't an > option": > > 1. What's the absolute faste

RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition

2002-01-21 Thread Blunt, James H (Jim)
From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition Even know I am not the Exchange Guru here - look at it from a pure networking standpoint. Do you have to have redundancy? How many

Re: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition

2002-01-21 Thread Peter Szabo
ED]> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 4:59 PM Subject: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition > Folks, > > Let's ask a couple of questions, based on the premise of "Money isn't an > option": > > 1. What's the absolute fastest amount of time that i

RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition

2002-01-21 Thread Michael Anderson
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Blunt, James H (Jim) Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition Folks, Let's ask a couple of questions, based on the premise of "Money isn't an option": 1. What'

Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition

2002-01-21 Thread Blunt, James H (Jim)
Folks, Let's ask a couple of questions, based on the premise of "Money isn't an option": 1. What's the absolute fastest amount of time that it would take to plan an AD/E2K structure? 2. How long would it take to implement an AD/E2K structure? 3. What kind of hardware do we need to have in pla