PIX involved?
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Ahlfont" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 1:10 PM
Subject: RE: blank emails
> No Im using outlook 2000. I believe it is something with the server
> because other users get t
TED]>
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 1:34 PM
Subject: RE: blank emails
> Yes we have a pix firewall
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 2:28 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: blan
Protocol logging:
\exchsrvr\imcdata\logs
Archive logging:
\exchsrvr\imcdata\in\archive and \out\archive
- Original Message -
From: "Wesoloski, Brett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 4:36 PM
Subject: RE: E-mailing to a group.
Exchange admin:Tools:Track Message
- Original Message -
From: "Wesoloski, Brett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 4:44 PM
Subject: RE: E-mailing to a group.
Yes. I Just enabled message tracking and restarted it as well. N
...an email address for which the Exchange Server isn't authoritative.
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Meunier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 5:04 PM
Subject: RE: moving/renaming user.
oh yeah. you could also tell him t
SMTP is SMTP. Does CF log it's activities? If so, what does the log say?
Have you turned up logging on the IMS? If so, what does the log say? What
address is CF attempting to send to? If it is not part of your domain, has
the IMS been set to relay?
$275/hour plus T&E and I'll fix this for you.
-
What does your Exchange administrator say?
- Original Message -
From: "Aristotle Zoulas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:06 AM
Subject: distribution list
> Exchange 5.5.
>
> I neeed to take someone off a distribution l
Can I do it in a box?
- Original Message -
From: "Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 12:14 PM
Subject: RE: distribution list
> At work, at home, in the car, on a plane, I guess you could d
All I saw was a bottle of Scotch. Hate the stuff.
- Original Message -
From: "Milt Atkinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:36 AM
Subject: RE: distribution list
> Bottom left hand drawer of my desk ... save me some ..
ur voice has changed!! :-)
>
> Mike Morrison
> NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator
> Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 12:23 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
&g
It has more to do with the client side than the server side. The range on
the client can be closed down but one then runs the risk of causing other
services to fail.
This is nothing new. Open an ftp connection to a server somewhere and take a
netmon trace. Your packets are going out to port 21 bu
Exchange uses UDP for new mail notifications which most routers have blocked
by default.
(psst: read the FAQ)
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Derby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:58 PM
Subject: Re: New mail notifica
Picked randomly by the client.
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Derby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 6:24 PM
Subject: New mail notification port(s)
> Does anyone know the theory behind the randomization of new mail
> n
Outlook will always create those foldres if they do not exist.
Set a policy that only certain kinds of clients are supported (the old
Exchange client, POP/IMAP). Someone calls in using OL, tell 'em they're
unsupported and on their own. Problem solved.
- Original Message -
From: "Mitchell
Starting point:
http://developer.netscape.com/docs/manuals/security/sslin/contents.htm
- Original Message -
From: "Joshua M. Folcik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 12:49 PM
Subject: Netscape and IMAP
This has been a b
It means the remote host is, er, unreachable.
That is to say: the destination domain was located and resolved in DNS but
the server can't be reached/isn't responding.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 15,
They are just text files. Notepad works fine.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:28 PM
Subject: Exch 5.5 TURF list - where is it and how to access it?
> The IMS has had a couple of email address
WAG: your AV is scanning the \exchsrvr directory structure.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Castillo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 2:47 PM
Subject: Event 2125
> On of my servers gets an an MTA database server error.
Their server is down or a router before it is fubar.
72 hours by default (configurable in the IMS; exactly where is an exercise
for the reader)
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 2:53 PM
Subject:
It's not server-side. There is a hidden folder in the client that, by
default, is enabled and is accessed by highlighting the Deleted Items folder
and selecting Tools:Recover Items. There is an optional reg key for it as
well.
The other alternative is to do a restore of the last backup to a spare
If the rule can be executed without the user's security context, it is
server-side. Otherwise it is client-based.
Example of server-side rule: when message with subject == ABCD arrives, move
it to :Special Folder
Example of client-side rule: when message with subject =WXYZ arrives,
forward it to
They are in the directory you specified as the turf directory when you made
the registry entry.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 12:35 AM
Subject: Re: Exch 5.5 TURF list - where is it and how to a
start admin.exe with the /r switch.
RAW mode is one of those things that if you need it, you'll know it. The KB
article will describe it.
I STRONGLY recommend not opening admin in raw mode all the time. If you want
to look at what it offers, that's fine. Be SURE to click cancel on anything
you d
Well, I suppose it's arguable as to whether or not the error message is
useful.
If a message transmitted via SMTP is not 7-bit ASCII, it has to be encoded.
That encoding is sent along with the message as an attachment. Therefore the
error message makes total sense.
- Original Message -
F
Its' only available by calling PSS and asking for it.
- Original Message -
From: "Lefkovics, William" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 1:47 PM
Subject: Inbox Rules Manager
> Where might one locate this utility - rulesmgr
Well, I suppose it's arguable as to whether or not the error message is
useful.
If a message transmitted via SMTP is not 7-bit ASCII, it has to be encoded.
That encoding is sent along with the message as an attachment. Therefore the
error message makes total sense.
- Original Message -
F
Two separate questions:
1. Getting OL to connect to Exchange through the firewall. Not a good
solution anyway since poking holes in your firewall defeats its purpose. VPN
is a better solution.
2. Getting the GAL visible to external users. LDAP, port 389.
- Original Message -
From: "Paul"
*shrug* It's true. The topic IS covered in the FAQ (list clutter, etc).
- Original Message -
From: "Semiglia, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 12:22 PM
Subject: RE: Admin Assigned Signature?
> Here we go
>
>
> Mi
The way it goes is that when someone identifies something that needs to go
in the FAQ, that person writes it up as a Q&A and submits it to the person
maintaining the FAQ. That person is Andrew Webb or you can send it to Chris
Scharff (they work together).
- Original Message -
From: "Ken C
So, lemme get this straight:
You have an application running that is actively servicing X number of users
and makes heavy use of memory cache. You order it to shut down and it
doesn't move fast enough to your liking so you just hit the power button
thus wiping all the transactions still held in m
At least a 25% overhead. Andy Webb did some testing on this.
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 10:42 AM
Subject: RE: IMS Limits incorrect?
> The encoding process when sending a
FAQ
- Original Message -
From: "Bowles, John L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 12:42 PM
Subject: IMS Queue
> All,
>
> I have a whole bunch of emails piling up in my IMS. The Orignator of all
> these messages say " <>" W
The logfiles show the _attempt_ to infect.
Symantec's scanner is broken.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Haaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: Code red
> It also shows up in the logfiles for w3sv
EVERYTHING gets logged.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Haaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: Code red
> This appears in my log just once:
>
> 2001-08-20 16:28:41 61.187.115.20 - 172.17.1.217 80 G
Read the FAQ again.
- Original Message -
From: "Mitchell Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 3:52 PM
Subject: Over limits message
> I have read the FAQ but I did not see anything about the following:
>
> Can the message
No, it means the other domain is configured incorrectly. Your IMS did a DNS
lookup of the MX/A records for the intended target domain. It connected to
the A address returned by DNS and opened an SMTP session to that box. That
box replied that it is not able to handle mail for that intended domain.
She is referring to a thread where one person made an obscure reference to a
line from a comedy movie. It came across as a threat. Someone else said,
essentially, bring it on and said his back was covered and that was said in
a joking manner.
I am taking vacation time to go to MEC and using my ow
The MTA is unable to determine the state (inbound, outbound) of the IMS.
Thus the MTA will still deliver messages into the IMS' hidden mailbox for
external delivery if certain conditions are met. Since the IMS was set to
inbound only, those messages were never looked at. Not until you set it to
ou
sent a flame mail during that week which did
> not get delivered until today. He said it was one of his "finer pieces of
work",
> but the recipient wasn't his boss at the time. Oopsy.
>
>
>
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Daniel Chenault wrote:
>
> > The MTA is
judge, since I am one of those arrogant ignorant
> admins. I cannot seem to get out of the "If it isn't broken, it doesn't
> have enough features yet" mode. If I would have known *better* I should
> have checked the queues before making the change to the correct config.
&
Single site? No problem at all. Just do it.
- Original Message -
From: "Debysingh, Bruce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 11:49 AM
Subject: Changing the Exchange Admin. Password (Service Account Password)
> Hello All,
>
>
accounts[2]?
>
> [1] a lan/wan/political thing, this.
> [2]A political thing, that. It might have ~50 service accounts :(
>
>
> Paul
>
> bcctc
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 12:55
I visited the site, with OLXP loaded and running. Nothing happened. Nada.
Zip. No warnings, no outbound mails, nothing.
- Original Message -
From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 3:46 PM
Subject: New Worm o
ns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 5:35 PM
Subject: RE: New Worm on the loose
> Check your hard drive for FishTaco.exe
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 6:28 PM
> To: Exch
Ex5.5 already has two information stores; one for mailboxes, one for public
folders. But that is all it has; you need Ex2K to get more.
- Original Message -
From: "James Casstevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 11:42 AM
Leave DNS alone and change the IP address of the new box to that of the old
box.
- Original Message -
From: "Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 1:03 PM
Subject: Removal of First Server in Site Que
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 1:08 PM
Subject: RE: Removal of First Server in Site Question.
> Actually, I forgot to mention we're cutting over to a new network, so all
> the IP addresses are changing for all the servers.
>
> -Original Message-
>
FAQ
- Original Message -
From: "Mario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:50 AM
Subject: exchange 5.5 e-mail disclaimer
> Is their a way to add a disclaimer to all internal and outgoing e-mails in
> Exchange 5.5 SP4.
>
> T
FAQ
- Original Message -
From: "Milan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 2:22 AM
Subject: Blocking Outside Mail
> I wish to disallow certain users to send mail outside my domain. they are
> anly allowed to send mail message
be better to select a server with the least
> amount of load. I'm leaning toward SYSTEMD which is the IMC and PDC,
since
> it will be on the same segment as the main Exchange servers. It also is
our
> OWA access point as well.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Ch
It is not recommended to have a single site 5.5 span domains. In this
context the 2K server would be considered a 5.5 server.
- Original Message -
From: "Bowles, John L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 2:05 PM
Subject: EXC
Since they are connecting from home they presumably have an ISP. They can
use the ISP's SMTP server.
- Original Message -
From: "Alex Lazen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 2:19 PM
Subject: Exchange 2000 Relay
Preventing
Server-side geek friend of mine once said:
Why do apps exist?
To stress-test the server.
Why do workstations exist?
To stress-test the network.
Why do users exist?
To stress-test the admins who are trying to keep the servers and the network
running.
- Original Message -
From: "Rocky Stefa
I think that's gonna be one for PSS.
- Original Message -
From:
Saul
Gonzalez
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 4:52
PM
Subject: Enterprise Calendar by Tom
Howe
I have been trying to configure this and have hit a
point in where I
If you followed the Q article for removing the first server AND all clients
have connected and been redirected to their new server, all is well. The
only thing you may run into is if anyone had any pointers in their PF
Favorites pointing to that old server.
- Original Message -
From: "Sakt
FAQ
- Original Message -
From:
Saul
Gonzalez
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 7:09
PM
Subject: RE: Enterprise Calendar by Tom
Howe
PSS?
-Original
Message-From: Daniel
Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
nks Daniel,
>
> All our clients are connecting to the new server without having to change
> their profiles, so I just need to ensure the first X5.5 server is removed
> correctly, yes?
>
> Sakti
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
Perhaps you also have a certian (sic) support number for help on that
product?
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Hanji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp
> for
I'm betting the Exchange server's advertised name and the IP a reverse
lookup renders do not much thus earthlink is kicking it back as spam.
- Original Message -
From: "Couch, Nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:04 PM
"Network error during host resolution" appears all throughout Technet.
It means that the domain was not resolveable by the DNS box the Exchange
server is configured to use.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, Augu
Rules are stored in a hidden message in the top-level of the mailbox. They
can be exported via the Rules Manager.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:04 PM
Subject: Exporting Outlook 2000 User Pro
FAQ
- Original Message -
From: "Buckley, Marie (UK - London)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:15 AM
Subject: Mailbox limit notification
> Does anyone know how to change the Mailbox limit notification message that
> is
Version and SP level.
- Original Message -
From: "Peña, Botp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:30 PM
Subject: Database resource failure error 0xfc0b -an hour ago
> Hello Team,
>
> I just got the ff error an hour a
I do believe Seattle Labs' offering is little more than a SMTP daemon and a
POP/IMAP daemon. I'm not exactly sure what you're trying to do here.
Howzabout posting the business requirement that led to this (questionable)
solution and why you think it's the way to go.
- Original Message -
F
sites spanning domains is not a good idea (I think I said this just two days
ago).
- Original Message -
From: "Bennett, Warren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 8:12 PM
Subject: Single Exchange Site/multiple Domains
> Hi
I can't think of any easy way to do this in 5.5; maybe an event script but
it won't apply only to messages going over the x.400 link. In 2K an event
sink will handle it.
- Original Message -
From: "kiran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, Aug
nners that can implement this type
of
> thing if installed on the X400 bridgehead server. However they will also
be
> a big hit on performance.
>
> Mark
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 31 August 2001 09:14
> To: E
The same mirror? If that mirror goes you lose everything. If put on separate
mirrors, the odds are against both of them failing at the same time.
For performance, the EDB files go on a striped set and the logs go on a
mirrored set (doesn't need to be striped; no advantage). If you lose your
EDB f
Haiku poetry
three lines of five, seven and
five syllables. Easy.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Morrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 8:12 AM
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
> Poorly is the word,
> but it was not a bad t
Martin is loved by
All others who try and fail
Which is all of us
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 8:18 AM
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
> Three cups of coffee
> My brain must wor
y?
> Must it always be funny?
> Was that funny?
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 9:24 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Haiku Friday
>
>
> Haiku poetry
> three line
Ya beat me to it.
- Original Message -
From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 8:41 AM
Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net
So the Firewall is relaying the mail?
In previous Checkpoint versions (<4.x), th
2 The Fundamental Truths
(3) With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not
necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land,
and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead.
_
> KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html
> Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM:
> http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp
> Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net
>
> Puns are for child
p
> Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net
>
> "Million to one chances crop up nine times out of ten." - Granny
Weatherwax
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault
> Sent: Friday, August 3
I'm not positive on this (far from being an OWA guru) but remember when you
installed OWA and it asked for a server in the site? I'm betting this downed
server is the one you put in and that gets hardcoded as the directory server
for the OWA server. Server unavailable == permission denied.
Just a
ne can clarify how this works. I wonder if
there
> is a way of changing that when a system is down and your waiting on parts
> and support to show up.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 10:18 AM
>
n Powell
> Systems Administrator
> Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
> Vancouver, Washington
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
> Fax:(360) 759-6001
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
!!
> Bravoo!
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 12:29 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: OWA access denied.
>
>
> Damn, am I good or what? A shot from the hip and hit the targ
When you joined the list, you _did_ get a link to the FAQ, right?
- Original Message -
From: "Patrick Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 10:31 AM
Subject: Adding Message to all outgoing email
> Can someone please tel
But that little search box on the default page comes in handy...
- Original Message -
From: "Bare, Ronald A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 11:39 AM
Subject: RE: Internet E-Mail content filtering program
> FYI: The
Well, "best" is a subjective term. I've heard good reports on OmFax.
- Original Message -
From: "Gordon Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:14 PM
Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution?
> Missy,
>
> I
I've got news fer ya bud; I"ve known Ed for several years now, hoisted more
than a couple of beers with him and he still gets sarcastic with me. I think
most would consider me a "list insider" (if such a thing existed).
- Original Message -
From: "Rocky Stefano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "E
Kevin, Exchange2K does not have a separate service account as with Ex5.5; in
Ex2K the service account is the machine account. Can't log on as the machine
account.
Alexio: when you say you logged on as "administrator" what do you mean? Is
this account enabled as an Exchange Enterprise administrato
You are one step away from killing your Ex2000 installation.
- Original Message -
From: "Cassani Alexio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 12:42 PM
Subject: RE: Instant Messaging: install problem
Ok, so first I need to
There are some post-SP4 fixes that you should consider. I suggest contacting
MS PSS to check on their applicability to your own environment. I think
playboy.com can afford the cost of the call (though I would as the engineer
to refund the call).
- Original Message -
From: "Grewal, Raj" <[
>From the little bit below, no error message, I'd guess your Exchange IMS is
set to not relay.
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 2:56 PM
Subject: third party client can't send email to
There's more to it than that. Check Technet for the article called "how to
remove the first exchange server in a site."
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 2:17 PM
Subject: First Exchange Server
I think you better call PSS on this one.
- Original Message -
From: "Anthony L. Sollars" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 5:48 PM
Subject: Win2k Server Password recovery!
>
> I have a win2k SP2 that I migrated from an
it requires a hostname AND a domain name in the two separate boxes. It will
also require a DNS server.
- Original Message -
From: "Van Huissteden, Adriaan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 10:26 PM
Subject: The Internet
SP4 modified the schema of the databases. You did make a backup before
upgrading to SP4, right?
- Original Message -
From: "Nizar El-Assaad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:04 PM
Subject: RE: MTA Problems with Exchan
That's not an error. That's nothing more than an encapsulated address.
You're gonna have to get more specific here.
- Original Message -
From: "Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:55 AM
Subject: RE: x400 connector?
Ahhh... thank you for illuminating us.
did you remove the x.400 address from your administrator or the site
addressing?
- Original Message -
From: "Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:58 AM
Subject: RE: x400 connec
There is an article on Technet on how to set it up. Search on "iis ims key"
> -Original Message-
> From: James Barry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:15 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Secure Email over the Internet between to Exchange Servers
In 5.5 it is not possible. In 2K it is possible using event sinks.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:07 PM
Subject: RE: NDR that I've never seen before
> If anyone finds a way, let me know b
The wording for any given error can be whatever the remote software allows;
some admins get cute and use alternate wording. The only thing the RFC
specifies is the number code.
- Original Message -
From: "Michel, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Se
Fast, cheap, easy
Pick two
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:03 PM
Subject: RE: Secure Email over the Internet between to Exchange Servers (5
.5)
> Since they're only lawyers, they probably
Yeah, PSS is a good call at this point.
FYI: -1018 errors are always hardware errors in the disk subsystem.
- Original Message -
From: "Benjamin Winzenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:49 PM
Subject: RE: Private IS
I'm assuming the CR represents an internet user, the mail going out the IMS.
If so, this is by design and expected.
- Original Message -
From: "Phillip Yan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 6:28 PM
Subject: Send mail to
The utility is mdbvu32.exe, found on the CD. There's an article on how to
use it (strongly recommended).
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 6:49 PM
Subject: inbound message crashed IMC and Inform
1 - 100 of 835 matches
Mail list logo
