RE: looking for hardware

There all used up resting my Special Brew!! -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 15:51 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for hardware What's wrong with beermats? :-) -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD)

Server causing Outlook to periodically crash

Title: Message Hi EveryoneGreat way to start Friday...Running Exchange2ksp1 on win2ksp2 - Completed migration from Exchange 5.5 a few days ago and all seemed well. This morning several users have complained and it has happened to me that Outlook hangs on you. I have left it for some time and

RE: one more try-how to gather exch container perms? and DNS mx failover-how?

Hi Pat 1. I do this manually, but I am sure some people have ways and means, you could also spend some money on some third party tools that will make it easier for you. 2. for your failover if you create your primary system in the dns with an mx cost of 10 then create one for your secondary system

RE: Server causing Outlook to periodically crash

Sounds like it could be a GC problem, and maybe DSAccess is stalling. Is this on a separate server? I'd start looking there. Neil -Original Message- From: Simon Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 16 November 2001 10:19 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Server cau

RE: CA becoming more responsive

This morning I had an email from CA wanting my phone number to address my concerns. It appears that they are listening. However, it is too late for them to win us back as a customer. Our purchase orders have been issued for Backup Exec software for our new servers. My experience with CA has no

Problematic Server

I have been asked to look at a server that has been badly installed. It was an SBS 2000 server and yet other packages (VPOP Proxy + vnc Office 2000) had been installed on the system. I was asked in after a couple of my colleagues had used up a period of the time assigned for this task. Unfortu

OWA login problems after changing username

Is there some rule with Outlook Web Access that says you cannot change usernames and still be able to access the account. We have moved to a new username scheme and I have changed a user's username. Now, the only issue he's having is that he cannot login to OWA. Any suggestions would be very mu

RE: OWA login problems after changing username

Use the alias or full smtp address for the user login... -Original Message- From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 7:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA login problems after changing username Is there some rule with Outlook Web Acc

Modprof and PRF for Outlook

Has anyone got a copy of a prf file for use with modprof as opposed to newprof. I can't work out exactly where the new variables and syntax should go in the file and would appreciate anyone else's verion to copy. TIA Paul List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_ch

Mixed and Native Mode

Can anyone tell me why, when I try to change to Native Mode on my Exchange Server the button is greyed out. I have no other Exchange 5.5 Servers onsite at all, but still it will not let me changed modes. Cheers Jez. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter

RE: Mixed and Native Mode

You still have an SRS running somewhere I expect. Neil -Original Message- From: Jeramy Eling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 16 November 2001 15:20 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Mixed and Native Mode Subject: Mixed and Native Mode Can anyone tell me why, when I

RE: Mixed and Native Mode

I'm reading on MS Website at the min. This is probably a really dumb question but I can I just delete it? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 November 2001 15:33 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Mixed and Native Mode You still have an SRS ru

Re: CA becoming more responsive

Well, for what it is worth, I also got a call. Not from a techie or a VP, someone in Marketing. I expressed similar concerns, non-English speaking (writing) tech support, the fact that their solution to everything is "re-install", the wait time, etc. What Christina told me was that they are giv

RE: OWA in DMZ

I have an almost identical config here - with the exception of NT4 for the OWA box (don't have much win2k expertise and currently don't run any Exchange stuff on it). Otherwise I do use a 1-way trust from the DMZ, and the port bindings for the DS and IS on the Exchange box are 1225 and 1226 respe

RE: CA becoming more responsive

LMAO! Really, I'm speechless, and that doesn't happen to often. -Original Message- From: Tiffany Ernest [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:12 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: CA becoming more responsive Well, for what it is worth, I also got a

Expansion server for distribution lists

We are eliminating one of our exchange servers (5.5, SP4) from our site. Unfortunately, a lot of our distribution lists point to this server as the expansion server. Is there a way to change this on all of our distribution lists at once instead of going into each group to make the change?

RE: Expansion server for distribution lists

I expect the expansion server attribute is exportablt to CSV, so you could try massaging the data and re-importing. Neil -Original Message- From: Crosby, Tim (Sarcom) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 16 November 2001 16:07 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Expansion se

RE: CA becoming more responsive

LOL! Me: "Hello, Tech Support? I installed ArcServe on my Exchange box and now it has a Blue Screen of Death on it." Chandler Vhing: "Could your box be any more f*cked?" > -Original Message- > From: Tiffany Ernest [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:12 AM >

RE: Mixed and Native Mode

The article "Exchange 2000 in Six Steps" gives a nice guide to getting rid of components in the right order (it's right near the end of the document). Neil -Original Message- From: Jeramy Eling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 16 November 2001 15:50 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List

RE: CA becoming more responsive

How *YOU* doin? -Original Message- From: Tiffany Ernest [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:12 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: CA becoming more responsive Well, for what it is worth, I also got a call. Not from a techie or a VP, someone in Market

RE: No Originator

from: 6.1 Reliable Delivery and Replies by Email If there is a delivery failure after acceptance of a message, the receiver-SMTP MUST formulate and mail a notification message. This notification MUST be sent using a null ("<>") reverse path in

RE: Sysfader

Title: Message Thanks, Tim.  I have W2K Pro & often get Sysfader Not Responding when I reboot.  -MichèleImmigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk ---

RE: Server causing Outlook to periodically crash

Title: RE: Server causing Outlook to periodically crash Also try taking a look at your 5 FSMO roles and see if you've overloaded that system(assuming all roles are on 1 server). Perhaps some of the roles may need to be broken out. Like GC. There are many white papers on this topic on TechNet a

RE: CA becoming more responsive

Is that a Friends reference? Computer Associates is desperate. I predict layoffs. William -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 8:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive How *YOU* doin? -

Loading Exchange Admin on W2K Prof.

Has anyone had any problems with running EX Admin on W2K Professional. I am getting errors when trying to load. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Loading Exchange Admin on W2K Prof.

None here... -Original Message- From: Scott Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Loading Exchange Admin on W2K Prof. Has anyone had any problems with running EX Admin on W2K Professional. I am getting errors wh

RE: Loading Exchange Admin on W2K Prof.

It works very well. What errors? What are you logged in as? William -Original Message- From: Scott Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Loading Exchange Admin on W2K Prof. Has anyone had any problems with runn

Re: CA becoming more responsive

I'm not really sure what Friends has to do with speaking English.. Maybe they're punishing the support personnel by making them watch that drivel. Matt - Original Message - From: "Lefkovics, William" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, N

RE: Loading Exchange Admin on W2K Prof.

What errors are you getting -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Loading Exchange Admin on W2K Prof. None here... -Original Message- From: Scott Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROT

RE: Loading Exchange Admin on W2K Prof.

When I try to load the admin piece, (Exchange 5.5 NT 4.0 W2k Prof.) I get an error when it asks for the cd key. I am loading from the Exchange CD. Is there a better way? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:34 PM To: MS-Ex

RE: Loading Exchange Admin on W2K Prof.

No problems herewhat errors are you getting? -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: Scott Oliver [mailto

RE: Loading Exchange Admin on W2K Prof.

We need specifics. What is the exact error you are receiving? -Original Message- From: Scott Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Loading Exchange Admin on W2K Prof. When I try to load the admin piece, (Exc

RE: Loading Exchange Admin on W2K Prof.

The error is as follows: The ordinal 6467 could not be located in the dymaic link lybrary MFC42.dll I am logged onto the machine as an administrator. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 1

RE: Loading Exchange Admin on W2K Prof.

Make sure you are using the "run as command" to run the admin program with a user that has rights to admin the Exchange server. Mark -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: L

RE: Loading Exchange Admin on W2K Prof.

None here either. Shane Scales, MCSE CCNA SPC, Network Engineer/System Analyst, US Army Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001

RE: CA becoming more responsive

Buy a TV. Joey, from friends. Typical greeting to female types. "How *YOU* doin'? J -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive Is that a Fri

RE: send as power

Title: Message "power"  makes me think of those He-Man cartoons.   " HAVE THE PWERRR!!!"  -MichèleImmigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk -

RE: Tracking relayed messages

Please note: the RFC only says "SHOULD NOT" -- this means it's not a requirement. There *are* some mail servers that DO show the BCC info in the headers, but don't count on it being there. -Michèle Immigration site: Our new 2001 Miata:

RE: Strange IMS problem

what happens when you run RESTEST on your Exchange server for those domains? -Michèle Immigration site: Our new 2001 Miata: Tiggercam: -

Re: Loading Exchange Admin on W2K Prof.

What is the file version for your machine's MFC42.dll? On a Win2K machine, it should be 6.0.8665.0 or later. -Scott - Original Message - From: "Scott Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:49 AM Subject: RE: Loadi

RE: CA becoming more responsive

LMAO -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 2:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive What is this "TV" of which you speak? Seriously, if it had something resembling acting or maybe dece

RE: CA becoming more responsive

What is this "TV" of which you speak? Seriously, if it had something resembling acting or maybe decent storylines it might prove interesting. I mean if you break your best friend and roommates chair, you tell him. If it wasn't for the excellent rendition of Smelly Cat it wouldn't be worth any

Exchange Operation 5.5 vs. 2000

I have a question, First here is the environment: 3 Exchange 5.5-SP3 Servers(Win2k SP2), this is the main e-mail environment. A sendmail server relays outgoing and incoming mail. Incoming mail is distributed to the appropriate exchange server by e-mail aliases for every address, pointing to the a

RE: CA becoming more responsive

That's their problem - once a customer becomes disenchanted and moves to a competitive product, and it works for them, and they get good support, it's hard to get them back. CA's underinvestment in support staff (and probably SW development) cost them a huge fraction of market share. I think it

RE: NTDSNoMatch and Migrating

Simon: Thanks for the info. Looks like NTDSNoMatch will do what I want then. I did some research for articles about the DN issue, but haven't found anything relevant. I agree that I think it will pick up a new DN--it doesn't look like the AD and EX5.5 DS even use the same attributes to

RE: CA becoming more responsive

Nope, but they have had one on "Just shoot me" which is what I'll request if I ever have to use the product again... ;o) D -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: CA becomi

RE: CA becoming more responsive

>>Was that Michael Duncan?<< Yup. Contacted you too, I presume. Seems like a step in the right direction. :o) Bob -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 5:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: CA becoming more

Re: OWA Scroll button

Anyone with an idea? Thanks - Original Message - From: "pbailer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:14 PM Subject: Re: OWA Scroll button > Sorry we are running EX 2000 Ent, SP1. OWA has > all default options. I have

RE: CA becoming more responsive

Actually, Mr. Duncan told me they are working on that too. They are holding English classes for their Indian staff. I think he mentioned that it involves more than just language and accent, perhaps mannerisms, social customs & such. Maybe they need training in how to deal with wise-ass comments

RE: CA becoming more responsive

I send a derogatory email to everyone on CA's website every couple of months. They responded a couple of weeks ago. I invited them to join the lists and peruse the archives. William -Original Message- From: Bob Peitzke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:02 PM

RE: CA becoming more responsive

Then they'd have to take you to the ER ...where of course another copy is sitting on the counter. W -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive Nope, but the

Re: OWA Scroll button

Anyone ideas on this. Thanks! - Original Message - From: "pbailer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:14 PM Subject: Re: OWA Scroll button > Sorry we are running EX 2000 Ent, SP1. OWA has > all default options. I ha

RE: CA becoming more responsive

Whose a wise ass?!?! :P -Original Message- From: Bob Peitzke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive Actually, Mr. Duncan told me they are working on that too. They are holding English c

RE: CA becoming more responsive

so no one told you that your backups would be gray (clap-clap-clap-clap)... no files, no apps, no mail, your server's DOA seems all your DLT's have been stripped clear, well they've been that way today, this week, all month, and most of the year... but... no one's there for you (when the mob lines

RE: Difference in rights between administrators and domain admins in Exchange2000?

Have you given "user" permissions to this user to the "additional mailbox"? In Exchange Administrator go to the mailbox properties and select the permission tab. -Original Message- From: Bob ten Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:09 AM To: MS-Exchange A

RE: RCPT To Questions

also available here: -Michèle Immigration site: Our new 2001 Miata: Tiggercam:

RE: CA becoming more responsive

And as I told Mr Duncan: they're three years too late. William -Original Message- From: Bob Peitzke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive Actually, Mr. Duncan told me they are working on

RE: allowed rcpthosts problem

Apparently, the admin of that mail server is only accepting mail from domains that are on a List of Approved RCPThosts. It seems as if your domain name is not on that list. Do a whois on their domain name & speak to the admin. -Michèle Immigration site: Our new

RE: Recall: logging out of OWA?

Q197094 -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - There's probably a great big flaw in this theory, but asking myself "What

RE: CA becoming more responsive

The bottom line of them moving operations to India is to save a buck and not pay the wages of well trained American employees, another blunder. just my .02 cents. -Original Message- From: Bob Peitzke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Adm

Relaying - background?

Recently one of my users forwarded me a couple of NDR messages she got, containing stuff like "recipient name is not recognized", "550", "Relaying denied", "user unknown". Our Exchange 5.5/SP3 server is not an open relay, and we are cool with all the ORDB & ~ databases, FWIW. This got me wonderi

RE: Palm syncing and Deleted item retention

The DATA is toast. I'm going through the very same thing, but with 2 years worth of appoints for a VP. Chapura uses it's own interface and that bypases the MTA completely. DumpsterAlwaysOn, item retention, etc will *not* work here. The stuff is gone forever. Can you say disaster recovery test

RE: CA becoming more responsive

Right next to the only Gateway machines sold to business in months. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 3:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: CA becoming more responsive Then they'd have to take you to

RE: CA becoming more responsive

Actually, a lot of programming and help desk ops are being outsourced to India. They have a lot of well-educated people who work for less than people here in USA. Ditto Singapore. It's a global village ... nothin' wrong with that. Don't know how many of them went to college here. But forcing

RE: Problematic Server

Did they run exchange setup with the /forestprep & /domainprep when installing? SBS normally does this for you... maybe they manually installed exchange? Cheers, Marty -Original Message- From: Tim Gilroy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 1:23 AM To: MS-Exchange

RE: Relaying - background?

Non open Relaying requires a user to login to the server, have an account on the server and have rights to that account. So only Joe can send email from Joe, when Joe is logged in as Joe. The other method is to restrict based on Ip so Joe can only send email if he lives on a 10.0.0.x ip range else

errors

Title: Message any one getting any errors I am getting some?   Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE   List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm