RE: Deleting a Single Message of Exchange Database

2001-11-21 Thread Simon Curtiss
My has the year gone by that fast!? Looks like it will be just William and me on the list tomorrow like last year. Hope you all get stuffed - in the nicest possible way of course. cheers from NZ Simon -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursda

Re: Deleting a Single Message of Exchange Database

2001-11-21 Thread Matt Moore
Better quaff one before you go. any excuse. :) M - Original Message - From: "Don Ely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:30 PM Subject: RE: Deleting a Single Message of Exchange Database > Dunno exactly yet... Wi

RE: Deleting a Single Message of Exchange Database

2001-11-21 Thread ebrastow
Reminds me of the joke... Q. Why did the chicken cross the road? A. To show the possum it could be done. Happy Turkey Day, Evan -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 4:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

RE: Deleting a Single Message of Exchange Database

2001-11-21 Thread Glen Macdonald
Maybe set up your RAS server for callback to your cell #, then put the # to RAS on your speeddial. Dial when inlaw/client/evil person isn't looking - RAS should call you back (?). You can then fake conversation and/or critical alert. Haven't tried this - I'll get back to you. --- "Clark, Steve" <

RE: Deleting a Single Message of Exchange Database

2001-11-21 Thread Kevin Miller
I am always here in spirit : > Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Deleting a Single Message of Exchange Database My has the year gone

Re: Deleting a Single Message of Exchange Database

2001-11-21 Thread Matt Moore
Careful now I here the couch calling! M - Original Message - From: "Glen Macdonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:55 PM Subject: RE: Deleting a Single Message of Exchange Database > Maybe set up your RAS serve

RE: Deleting a Single Message of Exchange Database

2001-11-21 Thread Clark, Steve
Looks like I have a new project.  Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member "Who's watching your network?" www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax   The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to

RE: Deleting a Single Message of Exchange Database

2001-11-21 Thread Glen Macdonald
LOL! I'll write up a ROI paper and a project plan (snort!)- I bet ANYTHING my CIO would sign off on it! --- "Clark, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Looks like I have a new project. > >  Steve Clark > Clark Systems Support, LLC > AVIEN Charter Member > "Who's watching your network?" > www.cla

RE: Deleting a Single Message of Exchange Database

2001-11-21 Thread Clark, Steve
Sounds like you may need consulting services as well.  Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member "Who's watching your network?" www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax   The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark

Re: Deleting a Single Message of Exchange Database

2001-11-21 Thread David N Precht
fdisk and format --- Frank Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Everyone > > Can anyone recomend the best way to remove a message > of the Information > Store. > > Thanks in advance. > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm >

RE: Deleting a Single Message of Exchange Database

2001-11-21 Thread Kevin Miller
What about fire? That might be even better. Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: David N Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 3:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Deleting a Single Message of Exchange Database fdisk an

RE: Deleting a Single Message of Exchange Database

2001-11-21 Thread David N Precht
axe ? crowbar ? magnet? --- Kevin Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What about fire? That might be even better. > > Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE > > > -Original Message- > From: David N Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 3:33 PM > To: MS-Exchan

RE: Antigen question...

2001-11-21 Thread Bibel, Laura Y.
Install it on both. Then you'll scan all internal mail too. Laura Bibel Allegheny Energy: Information Services Voice (724) 830-5966 Fax (724) 853-3600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- Fr

RE: Deleting a Single Message of Exchange Database

2001-11-21 Thread Kevin Miller
Those would be good too. Not sure which one would be the "best" a Hoffa might be good.. Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: David N Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 3:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Deleting a Si

RE: anti-relay

2001-11-21 Thread Edgar Guerrero Ortiz
Title: anti-relay In my servers I 've  limited the number of recipients addresses on each email to 20   Is this number too high or too restrictive ?   Thanks for your posts. -Mensaje original-De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Enviado el: Wednesday, November 21, 20

RE: Event Id 3038

2001-11-21 Thread Lynn Karen
Good thought: I'll try that - and let you know how we get on. Thanks, Karen > -Original Message- > From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 21 November 2001 13:48 > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Event Id 3038 > > > Actually, now I'm confused, as I read the ev

RE: anti-relay

2001-11-21 Thread Lefkovics, William
Title: anti-relay Depends.   I like 20.  It works for me.     -Original Message-From: Edgar Guerrero Ortiz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 3:53 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: anti-relay In my servers I 've  limited the number of recipients ad

RE: anti-relay

2001-11-21 Thread Kevin Miller
Title: Message you have that in writing from William, make sure you reference that if any one says anything. not that they will since William is always right...     Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: W

RE: anti-relay

2001-11-21 Thread Lefkovics, William
Title: Message I'm mostly left, actually.   -Original Message-From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 4:01 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: anti-relay you have that in writing from William, make sure you reference that if any one say

RE: anti-relay

2001-11-21 Thread Kevin Miller
Title: Message as in Lefkovics??     Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 4:01 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: anti-relay I'm mostly left, actually.  

RE: anti-relay

2001-11-21 Thread Kevin Miller
Title: Message DAM! spell chucker beat my joke...     Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 4:01 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: anti-relay I'm mostly left

RE: anti-relay [Tina]

2001-11-21 Thread Kevin Miller
Title: Message please everyone call Tina for some help she has sent me this 5 times now. must be a rule and not an OOOA   Thanks for the message. I will be on Thanksgiving Holiday, November 22nd and 23rd and on vacation Monday, November 26th. For computer technical support issues, please e-

RE: anti-relay [Tina]

2001-11-21 Thread Lefkovics, William
Title: Message It seems Tina has his/her own support issues.   -Original Message-From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 4:07 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: anti-relay [Tina] please everyone call Tina for some help she has sent me

RE: anti-relay [Tina]

2001-11-21 Thread Kevin Miller
Title: Message I noticed that 10 and counting...     Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 4:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: anti-relay [Tina] It seems

RE: anti-relay [Tina]

2001-11-21 Thread Kevin Miller
Title: Message should I make a rule to reply back.. we could whose server lasts longer???     Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 4:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSub

RE: anti-relay [Tina]

2001-11-21 Thread Lefkovics, William
Title: Message I have a P75 with Exchange5.5 Enterprise I could connect to the internet.  Throw a couple of humungous drives in there and create a rule that sends a 1MB attachment to Tina everytime it receives her reply.   It'll stop her mail server eventually.   -Original Message-Fr

RE: anti-relay [Tina]

2001-11-21 Thread Kevin Miller
Title: Message I just made a rule to reply back to her. we will see whose email server has more power. My personal email server is only a 500 MHz with a gig of ram. but I have 50 gigs free on the Priv drive. most of it in the form of white space : >   should I add an attachment to the email

RE: anti-relay [Tina]

2001-11-21 Thread Kevin Miller
Title: Message she stopped replying to me when I made my rule : < this is no fun     Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message-From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 4:20 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: anti-

RE: anti-relay [Tina]

2001-11-21 Thread Lefkovics, William
Title: Message The attachment accelerates the failure point.    If the goal is a quick demise, then apply an attachment, by all means.  If the intent it to see how many times you can successfully loop, then of course a plain text autoresponse is more fun.   William   -Original Message--

RE: Event Id 3038 - Off Topic

2001-11-21 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Outlook Rich text :) Simon Weaver NT Domain Administrator Ext. 5544 Tel: 02392-705544 (Direct Dial) [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 November 2001 04:55:PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event Id 3038 - Off Topic

RE: Event Id 3038 - Off Topic

2001-11-21 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Probably - buy as long as you can read the Email I don't care :-) Simon Weaver NT Domain Administrator Ext. 5544 Tel: 02392-705544 (Direct Dial) [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Rick Ward - HQ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 November 2001 08:40:PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Is

<    1   2