Its on the SMTP connector if I recall .. One of those tabs
-Original Message-
From: Chris Farrugia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 1:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Out of Off. Assistant
Thanks Missy!
Can't say I haven't tried.
Can I humbly ask
hi, i have really good questions;i'm not a real proffessional :(
I have just an IMS for Exchnage 5.5 installed on a W2K server.Total Mailbox
number in our unique site is 3000+.My users send excessively lots of mail
out from intranet to the internet.Although our internet output is 1 Mbps,IMS
Yes, you can do everything you describe. If you have 3 IMSs you can set them
up with the same address space (SMTP:*) and they will all take outbound
mail. You could also set 2 up for outbound mail and one for inbound mail (or
any other combination).
Kevin (not a professional either)
But the problem comes when one IMS fails, as the MTA will continue to
send messages to it and won't be able to re-route to another IMS. Just
something to watch for... :-)
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 28 May 2002 09:07
Yep! but let's not complicate the issue too much for AHMET!
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 May 2002 08:52
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: how IMS performance implemented?..
But the problem comes when one IMS fails, as the MTA will
What Exchange SP on you on?
What else do have running on that box?
Any recent changes made?
-Original Message-
From: Robert Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: STORE.EXE CPU Usage
Hi All,
We've got a
Title: SMS gateway
I was wondering if anyone on this list has used, or is using an SMS gateway for Exchange 5.5 (will be moving to 2000 soon).
Thanks
Graeme Carstairs
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Exchange SP4
Used also as a domain controller
Shared Directories for File Sharing.
No changes that I am aware of.
Regards,
Rab.
=
Robert JacksonPhone: +44 (0) 141 332 7999
Software Engineer
And this started all of a sudden?
Any Anti-Virus installed?
Anything in the event logs?
The high CPU usage is holding steady?
-Original Message-
From: Robert Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 8:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: STORE.EXE
I'll have to go with Missy on this one as well (duh) but for a slightly
different reason. E-mail tends to very different at different companies. How
things are done, varies and changes seemingly weekly. ASP aren't really
geared for that type of detail that most of us give to our systems. They
The original post already had what OS and SP. If the information is
provided, no need to ask. Right David...
-Original Message-
From: What OS and SP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 1:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mailbox archiving/moving
The tab I figure could make a difference in the SMTP connector 'Content
Restrictions' has the System Messages and Non-System Messages ticked (for
allow).
Any other places I should look, besides the ones I mentioned earlier on?
Its on the SMTP connector if I recall .. One of those tabs
The OS is W2k SP2 SRP1 and a dozen other hotfixes, running E2k SP1
ALL messages get stuck in the 'Retry' Queue and eventually in the 'Could
not resolve the address' queue.
This happens all of a sudden and affects all users/messages.
I have now found that the status (in monitoring) of the SMTP
Nothing out of the ordinary.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Wilcox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 6:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Free/Busy Shows No Information after June 30th
Anything in your event logs?
Thanks
Rob
-Original Message-
We have always been able to see two months of free/busy information. Even today, five
days after my original posting, I can not see any free/busy information starting July
1st.
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:28 AM
What happens when you stop the AV software?
If you are backing up your Exchange data with the server online - you
must be using the agent
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 8:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
Title: Re-homing a Public Folder
Setup: Exchange 5.5 Enterprise sp4, running on Win2K server
I want to re-home my Offline Address Book PF to another server within the same site (bigger, faster server). Is it really as easy as changing the Home server location on the Advanced tab (for prop.
Yeah make sure you aren't scanning the \exchsrvr folder on an
active\realtime scan or a scheduled scan...that will probably be the answer.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Philips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 9:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
I've been following the threads, reading archives etc but before I go
looking to hire someone to do this, I want to have a fair idea what is
possible.
We have Exchange 5.0 running on NT4 SP6 which is also PDC
Antigen installed
No direct internet connection, dials up to the ISP every 1/2 hour
Title: Message
You
will need to change it here: Configuration DS-Site configuration
offline address book
-Original Message-From: HOLLIDAY, Eric
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 8:08
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re-homing a
Public Folder
Title: Outlook Licensing Question
We're running Exchange 5.5, all properly licensed.
What is the latest version of Outlook we can run on a 5.5 CAL, without an Office license on the workstation?
(My MS rep is out of town and his sub is clueless)
Steve
List Charter and FAQ at:
Title: Message
Outlook
2000
-Original Message-From: Steve Hart
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 9:39
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Outlook Licensing
Question
We're running Exchange 5.5, all properly licensed.
What is the latest version
Title: Outlook Licensing Question
-Original Message-From: Steve Hart
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 9:39
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Outlook Licensing
Question
We're running Exchange 5.5, all properly licensed.
What is the latest
You probably need a faster connection to the Internet. For 3000+ mailboxes sending
excessively amounts of mail, 1 Mbps is not enough. If there is web traffic for
those 3000 users in addition to the E-mail, then your Internet connection is badly
overloaded.
By default the IMS permits
Title: Outlook Licensing Question
2000
-Original Message-From: Steve Hart
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 12:42
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook
Licensing Question
-Original Message-From: Steve Hart
[mailto:[EMAIL
Title: Message
Jennifer-
Thanks for the info!
Eric
-Original Message-From: Baker, Jennifer
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 12:37
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Re-homing a
Public Folder
You
will need to change it here:
What sends mail to the Internet?
- Original Message -
From: Chris Farrugia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 1:45 AM
Subject: Re: Out of Off. Assistant
Thanks Missy!
Can't say I haven't tried.
Can I humbly ask for some
I know I know!!!
A VIRUS!!
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 11:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Out of Off. Assistant
What sends mail to the Internet?
- Original Message -
From: Chris Farrugia [EMAIL
Actually, it's not the amount of $$ they want to spend - we had lots of
cool ideas about expanding services and HA. Clients just wanted email,
dagnabbit. And cheap email at that! Had we not been fighting against
other ASP's that were selling hosted Exchange (but POP or IMAP
only...), life
Q258696.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Farrugia" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 10:24 AM
Subject: RE: Out of Off.
Assistant
The tab I figure could make a difference in the SMTP connector
'ContentRestrictions' has
I'm getting the following event viewer error whenever I try to view/edit
the properties of any public folder on my Ex2k server.
The error message that pops up when the error occurs is:
The certificate chain was issued by an untrusted authority. ID no:
80090325, Exchange manager
I'm getting
Hi,
On rebooting our Exchange 5.5 (SP4) server, the Exchange IMS refuses to
start. All other Exchange services start fine. The only error in any of
the event logs is one with the EventID4086 - Unable to start the service
because the configuration could not be loaded from the Microsoft Exchange
I think I have an infected machine somewhere that is sending out emails
through our exchange server. I've blocked the mailbox from sending via
the IMS, but would like to trace which machine is sending them. The
mailbox is a general shared one, so there are several people who have
permission to
If you can get a header from one of the message you can get the IP.
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Bunting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 12:39 PM
To:
Exchange doesn't log IPs unless it is SMTP does it? I think this is using
MAPI.
let me explain furthur:
the message is being sent to our internal exchange server which then kicks
it over to another exchange server which runs the internet mail service. I
know how to turn on smtp logging, but it
Does anyone have any ideas what might be up here?
-Original Message-
From: Larry Penrod
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 9:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Free/Busy Shows No Information after June 30th
We have always been able to see two months of free/busy information.
If it is a shared mailbox then it is easily possible that more than one
workstation has been infected. Go clean them all.
-Original Message-
From: Bunting, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 3:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: logging/tracing
I'd like to find out which machine it is. Every machine should have AV on
it; could be something new, a script somewhere, or maybe a RAS connected
machine. The outgoing emails weren't flagged as infected by Scanmail, so it
doesn't appear to be trying to replicate/spread.
-Original
Hello,
I have two Exchange servers running 5.5 SP4 connected by a Point to Point
T1. Both are in the same organization and site just in two different
buildings. I see allot of entries in the Application log on the servers
regarding Bind and Bindback RPC errors. I looked this up on Microsoft's
Im probably missing something here, but Ill
ask anyway.
Im in the process of migrating from 5.5 SP4 to E2K
SP2. I havent had any problems moving mailboxes so far, until I ran into
one user. When I try and move his mailbox I get the option to create mailbox
and thats it. When I look in
Title: Outlook Licensing Question
Outlook 2000, I had to order the Exchange SP3 on CD to get the
distribution media and when I supplied the serial number of my CALs ( MOLP) to
Microsoft they gave me an unlock code for OL2000 for the number of CALS I
had.
-Original Message-From:
Title: Message
Don't forget to add to your calendar:
June 4 Webcast: Offline
Defragmentation with the Eseutil Utility
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=%2Fservicedesks%2Fwebcasts%2Fwc060402%2Fwcblurb060402%2Easp
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, WLKMMAS,
ExchangeMVP
List Charter
Title: Message
William,
Would I be correct in assuming that is for
both E2K and 5.5?
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:31
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: June 4 Webcast: Offline
Defragmentation with
Title: Message
Check out the upcoming chat on Exchange 5.5 to
Exchange 2000 Migrations (June 19, 10am PT/1pm ET) - You can find more
information about this chat on http://www.microsoft.com/technet/itcommunity/chats/.
Check out the upcoming chat on Exchange Documentation
(June 19, 11:30am
Title: Message
The
utility works much the same between the different versions.
Yes,
it would be applicable to both 5.5 and 2000.
-Original Message-From: Garland Mac
Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002
7:01 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
Title: Message
They
tell you evyting!
-Original Message-From: Garland Mac
Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002
7:01 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: June 4
Webcast: Offline Defragmentation with the Eseutil Util
ity
William,
Title: Message
Dont you people sleep? Dont
you go home?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 8:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: June 4 Webcast:
Offline Defragmentation with the Eseutil Util ity
Title: Message
I am
unemployed. I've been home all day.
-Original Message-From: Garland Mac
Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002
7:35 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: June 4
Webcast: Offline Defragmentation with the Eseutil Util
ity
Title: Message
That sucks. Wanna come finish this upgrade
for me?
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 8:42 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: June 4 Webcast:
Offline Defragmentation with the Eseutil Util
Title: Message
Give
me a TS-enabled login and I'll do it from here.
-Original Message-From: Garland Mac
Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002
7:41 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: June 4
Webcast: Offline Defragmentation with the Eseutil
Title: Message
As tempting as that is, I do that and I wont
learn anything. Besides, that would mean I need to setup a TS. (no more projects!!!) But thanks.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 8:54 PM
To:
I have a fairly Static userbase and stable situation. I upgraded my W2K
Domain Controllers to SP2 a while back on my Domain running in Mixed Mode.
My Exchange Server is running SP4 on NT4SP6a and when I tried to add a
user to the permissions on an existing mailbox today, I was unable to. The
Title: Message
Well
carry on then.
-Original Message-From: Garland Mac
Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002
7:55 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: June 4
Webcast: Offline Defragmentation with the Eseutil Util
ity
As tempting as
Title: Message
West
coaster here
-Original Message-From: Garland Mac
Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002
7:35 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: June 4
Webcast: Offline Defragmentation with the Eseutil Util
ity
Don't you people
Title: Message
Just one of those mile high mountain boys
here..
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 9:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: June 4 Webcast:
Offline Defragmentation with the Eseutil Util ity
Hi All,
Recently in our office with abt 30 clients, we upgrade all of our clients
from Office 97 to 2k (and so do the Outlook). After the upgrade, we face
the problem that all the clients logon to our Exchange 5.5 server slower
than before. The difference was about 5 second in which is
Outlook has a little more overhead than 97. I would look at network speed.
-Original Message-
From: William Yan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 9:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook slow down after upgrade
Hi All,
Recently in our office with abt
Title: Message
in
that case I normally have the customer shadow my Ts connection, we then can
either talk on IM or over the phone. all actions are watched and all questions
are answered.
I have
even taught classes this way in other states.
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And
Title: Message
Ill keep it in mind. But Ive
made a career out of baptism by fire. Just need the occasional pointer in the
right direction. Im not really having a problem, just
not familiar enough with the snap in to feel real confident with it yet.
-Original Message-
From:
Have you tried putting the exchange IP in your LMHOST (yes ...LMHOST).
Made a real difference for us.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
My humble apologies. The ARCServe Exchange Server Backup Agent
is in use (it would help if I got my facts right in the first place!!).
McAfee NetShield is currently being run on the server as well as McAfee
GroupShield. Whenever I turn the McAfee/Network Associates services
off, there is no
61 matches
Mail list logo
