RE: remote backup

2002-06-28 Thread William Lefkovics
Title: Message Blaming the users? The problem is deploying a vital messaging application into a production environment without first planning, testing and implementing a disaster recovery plan. -Original Message-From: John Sparrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday,

RE: remote backup

2002-06-28 Thread Snook, Kevin S (ITD)
Title: Message William, You're always such a stickler for the small details! ;-) -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 28 June 2002 07:37To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup Blaming the users? The problem is

RE: ETRN on Exchange or MDaemon?

2002-06-28 Thread William Lefkovics
Mdaemon, Wingate, etc. There are a lot of quality, featureless products out there for you to use. -Original Message- From: Chris Bodnar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 8:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: ETRN on Exchange or MDaemon? I have a client

RE: remote backup

2002-06-28 Thread William Lefkovics
Title: Message Ya silly me... -Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 12:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote backup William, You're always such a stickler for the small details!

RE: exmerge certain file types

2002-06-28 Thread Benjamin Zachary
Title: Message It should, the original intention of exmerge was to weasel out the melissa virus if I recall. Had a whole white paper on searching by subject or by extension. The content filters like antigen soon followed with a more robust tool. Heck, you can d/l the antigen 30 day trial or

RE: ETRN on Exchange or MDaemon?

2002-06-28 Thread Benjamin Zachary
Why not just ask the isp to break out into the mailboxes and put them there until you can bring in the exchange. Otherwise when you upgrade down the road mail is lost during that time.. -Original Message- From: Chris Bodnar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 11:02

RE: iHello

2002-06-28 Thread Benjamin Zachary
Well, lets see considering OWA, PDA's, and wireless pager/email devices. I would rather see it in text. We saw a demo of a similar product not too long ago, and although cool, was hardly productive. It cant pronounce all words etc etc the voice is just kinda clunky, so we stuck with web enabled

RE: Unable to add second SMTP address on recipient policy

2002-06-28 Thread Benjamin Zachary
Title: Message Sounds like as good a time as any. Probably because your EX5.5 was a bridgehead? or whatever its called. I wonder if you put in e2k and then connected a 5.5 site to the org if it would take precendence. -Original Message-From: Crosby, Tim (Sarcom)