Title: Message
Blaming the users?
The
problem is deploying a vital messaging application into a production environment
without first planning, testing and implementing a disaster recovery
plan.
-Original Message-From: John Sparrow
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday,
Title: Message
William,
You're
always such a stickler for the small details! ;-)
-Original Message-From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 28 June 2002
07:37To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote
backup
Blaming the users?
The
problem is
Mdaemon, Wingate, etc. There are a lot of quality, featureless products
out there for you to use.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Bodnar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 8:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: ETRN on Exchange or MDaemon?
I have a client
Title: Message
Ya
silly me...
-Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S
(ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 28,
2002 12:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
remote backup
William,
You're always such a stickler for the small details!
Title: Message
It
should, the original intention of exmerge was to weasel out the melissa virus if
I recall. Had a whole white paper on searching by subject or by extension. The
content filters like antigen soon followed with a more robust tool. Heck, you
can d/l the antigen 30 day trial or
Why not just ask the isp to break out into the mailboxes and put them
there until you can bring in the exchange. Otherwise when you upgrade
down the road mail is lost during that time..
-Original Message-
From: Chris Bodnar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 11:02
Well, lets see considering OWA, PDA's, and wireless pager/email devices.
I would rather see it in text. We saw a demo of a similar product not
too long ago, and although cool, was hardly productive. It cant
pronounce all words etc etc the voice is just kinda clunky, so we stuck
with web enabled
Title: Message
Sounds
like as good a time as any. Probably because your EX5.5 was a bridgehead? or
whatever its called. I wonder if you put in e2k and then connected a 5.5 site to
the org if it would take precendence.
-Original Message-From: Crosby, Tim
(Sarcom)