RE: E2K3 removal

YES!! I see that, Thanks.. Phil From: Bingham, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 3:58 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: E2K3 removal The groups you're looking for are in the Users container, not the Microsoft Exchange ... containers. From: Phil Thompson

RE: E2K3 removal

I believe the ones in the Exchange Security Groups OU are for E2K7. The ones created by E2K3 are created in the default Users container (and it breaks the servers if they're moved from that container). From: Phil Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, Oc

RE: E2K3 removal

The groups you're looking for are in the Users container, not the Microsoft Exchange ... containers. From: Phil Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 12:52 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: E2K3 removal I'm going back over what I may have missed removi

E2K3 removal

I'm going back over what I may have missed removing an old E2K3 server, I have a Question about "Removing the Last Legacy Exchange Server from an Organization" At the bottom of the instructions is as the below instructions: "After the last Exchange 2003 or Exchange 2000 server has been removed f

RE: Two Domains One Exchange Server

I think you want to utilize an Exchange Resource domain to host email: http://www.msexchange.org/articles_tutorials/exchange-server-2007/planni ng-architecture/deploying-exchange-resource-forest-part1.html This might not be the right Exchange version for you but it should point you in the r

RE: Enabling SCR / Seeding

Yes, I would just enable and let it bake (unless the network is saturated). Everything is relative. In Exchange 5.0, I would've said that a 45 GB DB was huge. Then again, the average size of an enterprise disk drive was 9 GB and your average Exchange server was a Pentium 75 Mhz with 32 MB of RA

RE: Enabling SCR / Seeding

Yes, the target is in the same room, actually. So no seeding necessary...just enable and let it bake? By your definitions all of our databases put together are miniscule @ 95GB Ehren J. Benson, MCSE Windows Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] 517-884-5469 From: Mi

RE: Enabling SCR / Seeding

Where is the target? Is it local? If it is local, unless your network is saturated, I would just do one at a time. When one copy is stable, then do the next. When I think of "sizeable"; I'm thinking 175 - 200 GB or larger. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP M

Enabling SCR / Seeding

Hi, I have been searching around and I seem to be finding conflicting information about how to initiate SCR from my source to target. I have the servers set up but heard that if your mailbox database already exists and is sizeable then you need to manually seed it. I see some blogs saying tha

RE: Two Domains One Exchange Server

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/268838 * Does anyone have any documentation on how to setup Two Domains with one Exchange Server. Company A and Company B Merged. Both are Windows 2003 A/D. There is an External Trust relationship between the two Domains. Now Company A is installi

RE: Two Domains One Exchange Server

Recipient policy? From: Lynden A. Philadelphia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 11:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Two Domains One Exchange Server Does anyone have any documentation on how to setup Two Domains with one Exchange Server. Company A and C