http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,479747,00.html
--
Sherry Abercrombie
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
Arthur C. Clarke
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja
PICK ME PICK ME!! MY BAGS ARE PACKED!
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.comwrote:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,479747,00.html
--
Sherry Abercrombie
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
Arthur C. Clarke
~ Ninja
No mention of high-speed? Can't... live... without... internet...
I want my, I want my, I want my ISP... *
*(sung to Money for Nothing) :-)
From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 8:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange
And you spam for free...
Shook
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 9:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone Want This Job??
No mention of high-speed? Can't... live... without... internet...
I want my, I want my, I want my ISP... *
You think they wanted you to write your blog on your new BB Storm?
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.comwrote:
No mention of high-speed? Can't... live... without... internet...
I want my, I want my, I want my ISP... *
*(sung to Money for Nothing) :-)
Storm?
As a died in the wool BB Kool-Aid drinker, all I have to say is E
From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 7:01 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Anyone Want This Job??
You think they wanted you to write your blog on your new BB
Well, I could have put my entries on paper and put it in a bottle...
From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 9:01 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Anyone Want This Job??
You think they wanted you to write your blog
All-
I have an Exchange 2003 Organization. I'm trying to install an additional
server into an Admin Group. The problem is, the customer I'm working for
doesn't remember the password to the account that was used to install Exchange
in the first place. Is there anyway I can change this so I
You can use the Delegate Permissions wizard to determine what account/group
has exchange full administrator rights over the organization.
Exchange itself, since 2000, doesn't use an account to run under.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP
My blog:
The issues is.. when in the process of installing Exchange on the new server.
.When it gets to the screen with what credentials to add the server.. The
credentials are greyed out. So I can't change them if I wanted to from
that screen.
Does that make sense?
_
John Bowles
You mean in the setup dialog titled Microsoft Exchange Installation Wizard
with the heading of Microsoft Exchange Server Administrator Account - Enter
the account to which you want to grant the Exchange Full Administrator role
??
No, you can't change it there - after you've installed the first
It has the title Service Account
And below that it says, Assign Service account information.
In the box that says Username it's greyed out with the account (That i'm
told) is the account that was used to install the first Exchange server.
I have plenty of users that I could use to do this, but
No need.
This means that ADC (the Active Directory Connector) is still in the
environment from when you upgraded from 5.5.
The RIGHT answer here is to fully remove the remnants of ADC from the
environment.
To work around it - does that account still exist? If so, just change the
password to one
Has anyone come across the issue of Exchange Server 2007 rejecting messages
because the SMTP envelope sender address was too large. Some messages from
Yahoo have sender addresses of upwards of 200 characters and are being
rejected. For example:
Seems like a good argument for a gateway based anti-spam system.
-
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
- Original Message -
From: John Wilcox johnw...@gmail.com
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Tue Jan 13
All,
I'm seeing an issue recently where it appears that my Exchange server
is duplicating messages and then delivering them.
For instance, UserA emails UserB.
UserA has one email in their sent items, and UserB has two in their
Inbox.
Upon reviewing the exchange message tracking, I
That is correct btw. There are still lingering 5.5 connectors in the Org.. .
It seems that I have to go into ADSIedit and remove the CA's in there before I
can remove the connectors since I can't connect to any of them trough the 5.5
admin console.
Thanks for your help Michael
We already have a relay in front of the Exchange server - that is how we
discovered that the messages were being rejected. The problem is that the
messages in question aren't spam. They are legitimate messages from Yahoo
weather alerts.
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets
Hello. I just completed moving a mailbox from an Exchange 2000 server to a
2007 server. The user reports that hundreds of messages that had been
deleted by the user over the last 6 months have reappeared in the user's
Inbox.
Has anyone heard of this, or know a way to make sure deleted messages in
Anyone have a recommended size for mailboxes in Exchange 2007?
Joe Heaton
AISA
Employment Training Panel
1100 J Street, 4th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 327-5276
jhea...@etp.ca.gov
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~
Anybody that does based on no more information than that probably shouldn't be
trusted in the first place.
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 2:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: mailbox size recommendations for
Can someone point me in the direction of manually removing ADC and SRS from
the Exchange environment? I have no Exchange 5.5 servers to remove them the
proper way.. so I think i'm going to have to perform open heart surgery on this
thing.
Thanks,
_
John Bowles
- Original
Is it possible to create a hybrid distribution list in Exchange 2007 whereby a
dynamic distribution list can have non-filtered users added to it ?
I have a dynamic distribution list that contains all mailbox enabled users in a
hierarchy of OUs. However, as is the way, it's been decided that
Please do not reply to this message. This reply has been automatically
generated. The person you are attempting to reach via e-mail is no
longer with Foley Lardner LLP. Please contact Rick Varju at x101-7433
for any work related questions. Thank you.
The preceding email message may be
How about creating a static DL with the one or two exceptions in it, and then
nesting the dynamic DL under it?
From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 2:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Hybrid
Please do not reply to this message. This reply has been automatically
generated. The person you are attempting to reach via e-mail is no
longer with Foley Lardner LLP. Please contact Rick Varju at x101-7433
for any work related questions. Thank you.
The preceding email message may be
You cannot manually add members to a dynamic distribution list.
However this may be a possible solution for meeting the request. Create a
normal distribution list which has the extra users and the dynamic list as
members. Then send the messages to the normal distribution list to have it
Please do not reply to this message. This reply has been automatically
generated. The person you are attempting to reach via e-mail is no
longer with Foley Lardner LLP. Please contact Rick Varju at x101-7433
for any work related questions. Thank you.
The preceding email message may be
I'm sorry, it was simply a very generic, simple question. Meaning, is
10MB recommended as best practice, or maybe 500MB, or maybe 10GB. Is
there a size where it becomes difficult to do a recovery? Not really
worried about the infrastructure, the question is simply an attempt to
get to best
Please do not reply to this message. This reply has been automatically
generated. The person you are attempting to reach via e-mail is no
longer with Foley Lardner LLP. Please contact Rick Varju at x101-7433
for any work related questions. Thank you.
The preceding email message may be
That question couldn't be more open-ended...
First, it would be useful to know what your hardware platform is. Are you
willing to sacrifice performance for capacity or do they need to be
accounted for equally? Have you determined the average IO profile of your
users?
Read these:
Looks like someone just got let go
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Tangen, Jeffrey A. jtan...@foley.comwrote:
Please do not reply to this message. This reply has been automatically
generated. The person you are attempting to reach via e-mail is no
longer with Foley Lardner LLP. Please
Hmmm, I think that Jeffrey A. Tangen just got canned from Foley Lardner
LLP.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Tangen, Jeffrey A. jtan...@foley.comwrote:
Please do not reply to this message. This reply has been automatically
generated. The person you are attempting to reach via e-mail
Please do not reply to this message. This reply has been automatically
generated. The person you are attempting to reach via e-mail is no
longer with Foley Lardner LLP. Please contact Rick Varju at x101-7433
for any work related questions. Thank you.
The preceding email message may be
What's up with this?!
-Original Message-
From: Tangen, Jeffrey A. [mailto:jtan...@foley.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 2:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: mailbox size recommendations for 2k7?
Please do not reply to this message. This reply has been automatically
Please do not reply to this message. This reply has been automatically
generated. The person you are attempting to reach via e-mail is no
longer with Foley Lardner LLP. Please contact Rick Varju at x101-7433
for any work related questions. Thank you.
The preceding email message may be
I think they found his constant emails annoying :S
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: 13 January 2009 20:32
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Hybrid distribution lists
Looks like someone just got let go
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Tangen, Jeffrey A.
Please do not reply to this message. This reply has been automatically
generated. The person you are attempting to reach via e-mail is no
longer with Foley Lardner LLP. Please contact Rick Varju at x101-7433
for any work related questions. Thank you.
The preceding email message may be
I believe he did, maybe he applied for that island job?
From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 2:32 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Hybrid distribution lists
Hmmm, I think that Jeffrey A. Tangen just got canned from Foley
Please do not reply to this message. This reply has been automatically
generated. The person you are attempting to reach via e-mail is no
longer with Foley Lardner LLP. Please contact Rick Varju at x101-7433
for any work related questions. Thank you.
The preceding email message may be
Please do not reply to this message. This reply has been automatically
generated. The person you are attempting to reach via e-mail is no
longer with Foley Lardner LLP. Please contact Rick Varju at x101-7433
for any work related questions. Thank you.
The preceding email message may be
Yeah - you'd think that if they intended this to go to the internet that
they'd include an external phone number - oops.
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 12:32 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re:
Please do not reply to this message. This reply has been automatically
generated. The person you are attempting to reach via e-mail is no
longer with Foley Lardner LLP. Please contact Rick Varju at x101-7433
for any work related questions. Thank you.
The preceding email message may be
Yesof coursedunno why i didn't occur to me.
Thanks
Olly
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net]
Sent: 13 January 2009 20:24
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Hybrid distribution lists
How about creating a static DL with the one or two exceptions in it,
Please do not reply to this message. This reply has been automatically
generated. The person you are attempting to reach via e-mail is no
longer with Foley Lardner LLP. Please contact Rick Varju at x101-7433
for any work related questions. Thank you.
The preceding email message may be
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa997967.aspx
Regards,
Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP
My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael
I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php
-Original Message-
From: John Bowles
Please do not reply to this message. This reply has been automatically
generated. The person you are attempting to reach via e-mail is no
longer with Foley Lardner LLP. Please contact Rick Varju at x101-7433
for any work related questions. Thank you.
The preceding email message may be
Outlook rule time...
-Original Message-
From: Tangen, Jeffrey A. [mailto:jtan...@foley.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 2:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: mailbox size recommendations for 2k7?
Please do not reply to this message. This reply has been automatically
Please do not reply to this message. This reply has been automatically
generated. The person you are attempting to reach via e-mail is no
longer with Foley Lardner LLP. Please contact Rick Varju at x101-7433
for any work related questions. Thank you.
The preceding email message may be
I'll bet that if we all forwarded each copy to Rick (probably
rva...@foley.com), it might stop.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 12:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: jtan...@foley.com
Can you kick this guy?
~
Please do not reply to this message. This reply has been automatically
generated. The person you are attempting to reach via e-mail is no
longer with Foley Lardner LLP. Please contact Rick Varju at x101-7433
for any work related questions. Thank you.
The preceding email message may be
That particular white paper was written against Exchange 2003 RTM and
Outlook 2003 RTM.
Just goes to show how things change..
Regards,
Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP
My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael
I'll be at TEC'2009!
Please do not reply to this message. This reply has been automatically
generated. The person you are attempting to reach via e-mail is no
longer with Foley Lardner LLP. Please contact Rick Varju at x101-7433
for any work related questions. Thank you.
The preceding email message may be
Appropriate mailbox sizes are completely dependent (IMHO) against your
performance objectives and recovery-time objectives.
For example, if 1 GB mailboxes allow adequate performance but push your RTO
to six hours, and that isn't acceptable to your business, then you have to
shrink'em.
Please do not reply to this message. This reply has been automatically
generated. The person you are attempting to reach via e-mail is no
longer with Foley Lardner LLP. Please contact Rick Varju at x101-7433
for any work related questions. Thank you.
The preceding email message may be
I doubt this. Seems more likely to be an Outlook view issue.
What's your Deleted Item Recovery set to on the source store? Do you make
regular full backups? (So that transaction logs get purged.)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP
My blog:
Quick question, if I have no more Exchange 5.5 servers left in
the Organization can I remove the CA's via ADSIEdit with effecting anything?
Thank you,
_
John Bowles
- Original Message
From: John Bowles john_bow...@yahoo.com
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Does it happen with OWA or just Outlook?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP
My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael
I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php
From: Jason Gauthier [mailto:jgauth...@lastar.com]
Sent: Tuesday,
You should try to remove the service first, using the link I posted earlier.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP
My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael
I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php
-Original Message-
From: John Bowles
How odd, one of my users was complaining about this today as well...using
Outlook. But everything she sent to me, came through only once. Same server
version...
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Jason Gauthier jgauth...@lastar.comwrote:
All,
I'm seeing an issue recently where it appears
I tried, but it's telling me I have to remove the CA's first.
_
John Bowles
- Original Message
From: Michael B. Smith mich...@theessentialexchange.com
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:27:30 PM
Subject:
I'm seeing this for one recipient, but only with calendar items.
No luck tracking this one down yet.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Jason Gauthier jgauth...@lastar.com wrote:
All,
I'm seeing an issue recently where it appears that my Exchange server is
duplicating messages and then
Most of my users are strictly outlook users, so I don't have any OWA
information. And it's so sporadic, it's extremely hard to diagnose.
(And it's only some users some of the time)
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:33 PM
Is the server where ADC used to be installed gone? If not, I'd recommend
using ADC Utility (which name escapes me) to remove the CAs.
Otherwise, yes, I guess you'll have to.
(It's been a couple of years since I manually removed ADC - I used to could
do that in my sleep. But I've forgotten the
I just came across an old print out at home that had the steps. I
will look for. If I did not throw it in the trash bin, I will send it
to you when I get home.
Steven Peck
http://www.blkmtn.org
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Michael B. Smith
mich...@theessentialexchange.com wrote:
Is the
I have spam msg's coming from one users account and I can't figure out
the source. Exchange 2003 sp2 and outlook 2003. The msg's aren't
coming from the users pc because they are being sent when he's shut
down. But when you boot up and open outlook it shows the msg's in his
sent items. Which
If you suspect the account has become compromised, why have you not changed
the password yet. If the user has POP3 of IMAP permission, you can also
disallow him from using it, in case it is coming from his home machine,
which may be left on all the time. If you change his password in the
morning,
No pop or imap allowed, actually no external access allowed at all other
than BES and via webmail after accessing the Cisco's SSLVPN. I wiped
his BB just for the heck of it. Also put the latest SR3 patch and
Critical pdf patch on the BES.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Szabo
Oh yes, and I changed his PW.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Szabo [mailto:steve...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 9:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help tracking down Source of Spam
If you suspect the account has become compromised, why have you not
changed
Sounds like you missed the -standbymachine parameter of the disable
command. Good to know so we don't all start digging through adsiedit...
-alex
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 6:54 AM, Russ Patterson rus...@gmail.com wrote:
FYI -
MS got us fixed up - Using ADSIEdit, we went here:
CN=[*Storage
70 matches
Mail list logo
