I think we had it since 5.5 days so our pricing was probably better than
getting a brand new license.. :)
Alice
-Original Message-
From: Paul Steele [mailto:paul.ste...@acadiau.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 7:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Using Exmerge after migrat
One other thought.
When you were faxing you did not know if someone read it. You only knew if it
was delivered. So your new requirements are more than your old requirements.
The delivery (not read) receipts Exchange gives you are reliable and accurate.
It generates them off the SMTP conversati
So.. how do I tell it that unless the user is authenticated, do not accept
from @samedomain.com?
From: Chris Boller [mailto:ch...@mahoola.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 2:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Open relay... Kind of
That's right, out of the box you can deliver m
If they are html based emails you can imbed an image on a webserverparse
the logs for the IP address that hit it and when. But that depends on them
using and reading in html and is rather cumbersome. Not very reliable. Or you
can go with a commercial service such as:
http://www.didtheyrea
We're looking to move from faxing our purchase orders to using email by an
automated process. We need a way to verify that the email was delivered and
read by the person we sent it to. I brought up that not all companies provided
NDRs and that not all email systems support delivery and read re
Open Relay test: http://www.abuse.net/relay.html
Die dulci fruere!
Roger Wright
___
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 2:49 PM, wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Having one of those days.
> Just noticed our exchange server doing something funky and wondered if I was
> missing something.
>
> Using an Exchange 2003
>From an outside (stranger) network.
From: Eric [mailto:seag...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 2:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Open relay... Kind of
I haven't used Exchange 2003 in a while, but are you testing this using
telnet from within your network? I know s
That's right, out of the box you can deliver mail to any exchange 2003 server
and as long as it's in the accepted domain list it will deliver regardless of
the mail from:<>
CB
From: gro...@beachcomp.com [gro...@beachcomp.com]
Sent: 06 July 2010 19:49
To: MS-Exch
I haven't used Exchange 2003 in a while, but are you testing this using
telnet from within your network? I know some other mail systems I've used
(Postfix) can allow only certain IP's or a local lan to send mail.
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:49 AM, wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Having one of those days.
Hi all,
Having one of those days.
Just noticed our exchange server doing something funky and wondered if I was
missing something.
Using an Exchange 2003 machine, and for some reason it's allowing local to
local e-mail remotely and w/o authentication.
What am I missing here?
Here's a telnet sess
It shows for each user who has connected, so multiple times is not uncommon,
and if they haven't logged in recently then there will be no information shown.
It is about the best that you will be able to do though.
Simon.
--
Simon Butler
MVP: Exchange, MCSE
Sembee Ltd.
e: si...@sembee.co.uk
w:
If the iPhone was setup to synch with the Xch account and he deleted
items from the iPhone, they will be deleted from his Xch account
(Outlook). It is a true "synch". I know of a few people who have
upgraded to the latest iPhone O/S and it has FUBAR'd their devices and
had to revert to backups. May
Thanks that kind off worked, it shows each user 4 - 6 times and not giving
me all users.
Thanks
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Simon Butler wrote:
> The method of connecting is reported to Exchange, and recorded as part of
> the Logon Statistics. Therefore all you have to do is query the val
We've had several Ex2007 user mailboxes with those symptoms. Their
mailbox's AutomateProcessing flag were getting set to "autoaccept" instead
of "autoupdate" ... Had to run a powershell script to change that setting,
and have not determined how the flag got reset. I'm not sure it's the same
issue
I know this discussion came up somewhere (here?) last week, but I didn't pay
close attention.
Check out http://support.microsoft.com/kb/983316
And the most recent EMO available at slipstick.com
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
The method of connecting is reported to Exchange, and recorded as part of the
Logon Statistics. Therefore all you have to do is query the value of Client
Mode.
For example:
Get-Mailbox -Server ServerName | Get-LogonStatistics | Where { $_.ClientMode
-eq "Classic" }
That will give you a list o
Ok, over the last week I have slowly converted many users 50+ to cached
mode, I have the template setup yo force it with GP, however I would like a
list of users not in cached mode before I turn on the GP, so I don't bring
down the E2k7 server if too many users start converting at ones.
I have bee
Has anyone come across issues with Syncing Outlook contacts with Iphone
or Ipads?
One person managed to duplicate the contacts and then some how delete
the contacts from both Outlook 2003 and Iphone.
The Iphone in question Syncs with Exchange using the inbuilt client.
This was setup over a week ago
I guess it's a matter of opinion whether something is too expensive or not. I
got a quote for our single server, 900 mailbox setup and it was over $6000.
It's going to be very hard to justify for restoring a single mailbox! We might
use it once or twice over a few years but it's still too much f
Michael,
Thnx for the answer! I've found a nice article yesterday on the MS Exchange
team blog.
http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2009/11/18/453251.aspx
The problem was that the users where still able to delete and create new groups.
We only want them to manage the ones they own.
Met vriendelij
20 matches
Mail list logo
