That's not set by Exchange on mailboxes unless manually set (or set by an
external provisioning system).
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Wayne Dueck [mailto:wayne.l.du...@state.or.us]
Sent: Tuesday,
Exchange 2007 depends on the registry, configuration files in the Exchange
directory (both for .NET and straight config files), and database content.
There are KB articles that define what you theoretically need. But they are,
unfortunately, incomplete (altho they may have been accurate at the
Quick question, folks.
I've heard from a couple of sources that when upgrading from Exchange
2003 to 2010 that the mailboxes will double in size. Is this correct?
I'm trying to provision new servers with storage to last us 3-5 years.
J
Thanks.
Philip
---
To manage subscriptions
Some sort of Chinese whisper going on? Or are people referring to Single Item
Recovery making mailboxes bigger as the months roll by after a migration..
Richard
From: bounce-9158637-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-9158637-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Phil
They probably mean because you lose Single Instance Storage. Not sure
what the average numbers are but from what I've seen (we'll be doing
this ourselves in a few months) doubling is very unlikely.
From: Phil Hershey [mailto:phers...@agia.com]
Sent: 03 November 2010 13:26
To: MS-Exchange
I would think that part of it has to do with the move away from SIS in 2010.
That's just a semi-educated guess based on conversations here.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Sobey, Richard A r.so...@imperial.ac.ukwrote:
Some sort of Chinese whisper going on? Or are people referring to Single
Thanks, Richard.
I'll bet the reference is to down-time bloat due to the new Dumpster
functionality. My concern was that a large mailbox was going to double
in size at the moment of migration.
If this was a truly dumb questions, my bad. I go off to E2010 training
in 10 days.
Philip
Not a dumb question by any means :) Enjoy your training.
From: bounce-9158653-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-9158653-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Phil
Hershey
Sent: 03 November 2010 13:39
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mailbox Expansion During
I know where this thought of mailbox size doubling may have come from.
If you compare the size of the mailbox in ESM with the size of the mailbox as
displayed in Exchange Management Console, then it will be very different.
The reason for this is that ESM doesn't report the true size of the
I’ve asked the question and was told the MS themselves saw a 20% increase in DB
size on their migrations.
Regards
[cid:image001.jpg@01CB7B6D.5FCE2BF0]
Peter Johnson
I.T Architect
United Kingdom: +44 1285 658542
South Africa: +27 11 252 1100
Swaziland: +268 442 7000
Fax:+27 11 974 7130
Mobile:
These were all the rage 5 years ago but I see them less and less these days.
Still a necessary evil? Anyone still using them?
Thanks,
Dennis
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
Still use them. Exchange 2010 makes it fairly easy. They are required in my
enviroment (legal).
- Original Message -
From: Dennis Melahn den...@advancedav.com
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 3, 2010 9:48:34 AM
Subject:
Honestly I've yet to encounter a single techie who thinks they do anything
worthwhile, it always comes down to our lawyers said we should.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Melahn [mailto:den...@advancedav.com]
Sent: 03 November 2010 13:49
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Disclaimers
Still as meaningless and UN-necessary as ever!
Unfortunately yes, many still do it.
~JasonG
** DISCLAIMER **
If there is any other disclaimer or legal notice in this posting, it
is hereby declared NULL and VOID; you may safely ignore that content.
This disclaimer supersedes all other
You are kidding, right? This list is lousy with them and other
signature bloat.
On Wednesday, November 3, 2010, Dennis Melahn den...@advancedav.com wrote:
These were all the rage 5 years ago but I see them less and less these days.
Still a necessary evil? Anyone still using them?
Thanks,
We still have them on our gateway box.
John
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Melahn [mailto:den...@advancedav.com]
Sent: 03 November 2010 13:49
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Disclaimers
These were all the rage 5 years ago but I see them less and less these
days. Still a
Does the same go for logon warnings? We still find ourselves obliged to
put these in place so that users can't claim they didn't know we'd be spying
on them, but I'm not sure there is actually any legal precedent for it.
On 3 November 2010 13:53, Paul Hutchings paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk wrote:
The great thing about disclaimers for 2007 and 2010 is that you can use 1
disclaimer for internal emails and 1 for external emails.
Since I run the IT department here, the IT staff runs a disclaimer
for internal emails that talks about how and when to contact tech support.
The external email
Thank you, Simon. That means my executives with 5-10 GB mailboxes have
even more junk they're unable or unwilling to delete than even I
thought. If only we could get buy-in on enforcing some policies. J
Philip
From: Simon Butler [mailto:si...@sembee.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, November
Please do the world a favor and tell YOUR lawyer to take a lookie
http://arborlaw.biz/blog/2007/07/19/legal-issues-in-email-disclaimers/
Since it's predictably non-terse here's the key takeaways:
A disclaimer COULD POSSIBLY serve as (legal) notice that protection of
info was attempted (and
They are a great big-old-load of bobbins
--
Regards,
James.
http://www.jamesbensley.co.cc/
There are 10 kinds of people in the world; Those who understand
Vigesimal, and J others...?
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to
I'd say a better method (of covering yourself) would be having it as part of
the employee/personnell handbook and having them sign of as having
read/received the handbook.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:57 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
Does the same go for logon warnings? We still
I'm exploring email encryption solutions for HIPAA compliance. I'm interested
in opinions on solutions with specific focus on the the recipient's
experience upon delivery of an encrypted email. An Ironport appliance is
intriguing because it appears I can incorporate both anti-spam and
I didn't finish reading that article because there is no grounds for
legal action depending on the information disclosed (I believe).
For example: it is my understanding that if I emailed you details on a
shared customer of ours, in particular some personal details subject
to The Data Protection
We use Zix. Check with your business partners, we’ve found that many of ours
are already using Zix, so it is practically a no-brainer.
Jim
Jim Holmgren
Manager of Server Engineering
XLHealth Corporation
The Warehouse at Camden Yards
351 West Camden Street, Suite 100
Baltimore, MD
Zix (through MessageLabs)
MEssagelabs also does our anti-spam, anti-virus, and content filtering.
From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:jholmg...@xlhealth.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 10:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ironport - Zix - PGP or?
We use Zix. Check with
We use PGP Universal server and works OK for us.
Messages don't actually leave the business as such, they are held on a
secure portal.
It also does have the ability to have additional applications installed
to it, ie Whole disc encryption, PDF messenger(secure PDFs)
John
If you use the SBS applications for managing the server, backing up exchange
is a snap. Just use the built-in app. I can't remember the tab but it is
in that little application unique to SBS for managing all the SBS stuff in
one place. Using the standard WS2K8 stuff is much more difficult.
I wrote those topics.. they were accurate at RTM... = ] I can't speak to them
now, but they were then.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 12:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Which files to backup on Exchange 2k7
Exchange 2007
There's not another name, get-mailbox just doesn't return it as a property.
Get-user does, however.
This will work for getting the title added to a console display:
[PS] C:\Get-Mailbox name | ft Name,DistinguishedName,Server,Database,@{label
= Title;expression = {(get-user
+1
We just went with Zix about 6 weeks ago. Works pretty good for us. However,
you should know that the Subject line is not encrypted so PHI shouldn't be
included in the subject line. We ran into this when we were testing sending Lab
reports to providers (instead of faxing) and had to make a
Using for encrypting emails with PHI.
- Original Message -
From: Paul Chinnery PaulC @ mmcwm .com
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist @ lyris .sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 3, 2010 12:42:50 PM
Subject: RE: Ironport - Zix - PGP or?
+1
We just went with
I've searched for this but haven't found an answer. And I apologize at the
start that this will probably go on...
We wanted to create more secure connectors on our exchange 2007 servers as we
only had a default one (accepting from any IP) and also a External Relay
Connector (for use of our
We tried out an IronPort unit, and now we’re going to purchase 2 of them. We
needed to start implementing encryption for HIPAA purposes between us and
insurance carriers, as we’re a 3rd party insurance administration company. We
like the idea of offloading the TLS overhead from the Exchange
I have a few Dynamic DL's which work fine using OPath query's. These aren't
externally available
as my recip policy filters on an AD attribute, but they don't need to be.
Now I need a few DL's that are externally available via email where membership
is fairly static
but I can't see how these
Manually specify the external SMTP address and turn off Automatically update
e-mail addresses based on e-mail policy.
Don't overthink it. :)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
Sent:
Sorry, but I've got another basic question. Can't wait to actually get
my training.
In our environment only the MS Forefront Online Protection Server are
allowed to 'touch' our email servers to deliver messages. We don't have
a formal DMZ per se, but all the servers sit behind Cisco firewall
You don't need Edge servers if you are running FOPE.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Phil Hershey [mailto:phers...@agia.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 4:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Another Noob Question
Sorry,
Lol, I'm so dumb...
Thanks Michael!
jlc
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 2:32 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DL's in 2010sp1
Manually specify the external SMTP address and turn off Automatically update
e-mail addresses based
Thank you, Michael. Excellent news. I can spend the money for 2
DL320's on more drives for the DL385's. J
Appreciate your blog by the way. Too bad you're not in the Santa
Barbara area.
Philip
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03,
40 matches
Mail list logo
