Hello all,
I've ran into a database problem this morning.
As you can see in the image there are a huge amount of log files generated this
weekend.
Since the volume is only 30GB it ran full with the associated problem of the
database being dismounted.
Is there any way to detect what/who
I've had some success in the past using this method.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/scottos/archive/2007/07/12/rough-and-tough-guide-to-identifying-patterns-in-ese-transaction-log-files.aspx
There may be better tools out there now, but it's certainly pinpointed
potential culprits about 50% of the time.
2003
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:d...@parkviewmc.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2011 7:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 books, revisited
Hey Paul question on that 2010 class you took. Are you migrating from 2003 or
2007?
Thanks
dave
From: Maglinger,
grep @ *.log | wc -l
I'm betting that you've got a new iPhone user doing ActiveSync
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 00:52, Vandael Tim tim.vand...@khlim.be wrote:
Hello all,
I’ve ran into a database problem this morning.
As you can see in the image there are a huge amount of log files generated
We have Exchange 07, and have carried public folders along for seven or eight
years. We only have calendars. And only a few, about 10. Where else should I
start thinking about moving them before I go to Exchange 10 later in the year?
People here use them.
---
To manage subscriptions click
Leave them in public folders.
Why do you want to move them?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Holstrom, Don [mailto:dholst...@nbm.org]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 11:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public folders...
We
Take em with you. E2010 still supports PF’s.
From: Holstrom, Don [mailto:dholst...@nbm.org]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 8:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public folders...
We have Exchange 07, and have carried public folders along for seven or eight
years. We only have
Resource mailbox. No brainer.
You lucky sod ☺
From: bounce-9289665-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-9289665-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of
Holstrom, Don
Sent: 28 February 2011 16:20
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public folders...
We have Exchange 07,
Hello,
It seems there are two ways to load balancing incoming email using DNS MX
records.
Method 1: Multiple MX records with equal priority.
Method 2: One MX record with multiple IP address.
What's the pros and cons? Somebody suggested the Method 1, because multiple MX
entries with the same
DNS provides basic round robin, when a dns query is made to given DNS server,
in reality it is upto sender who to sent it too regardless the query order , so
if you want true LB you have got to have HW load balancer in the front with
multiple IPs
Oz
Oz Casey, Dedeal
Senior Network Consultant
We use method 1 and have been for 15+ years. The *vast* majority of software
out there follow MX's decently. Every once in a while when one of those edge
systems is down we'll get reports that something inbound failed, but it's very
few and far between.
We have 3 inbound receivers on the MX
I can't think of any reason why having multiple MX records with the same
precedence would cause failover to happen any faster if one is down.
You may get less delay in getting incoming email processed with multiple MX
records with the same precedence because it will be more of a load balancing
I'd look at using Powershell and the EWS Managed API.
Glen Scales has some excellent examples of using Powershell with the EWS API on
his blog.
http://gsexdev.blogspot.com/
From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 10:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
If the sender is implemented properly, there is no difference whatsoever in the
OP's question.
Per RFC, both choices are completely random. (One being the DNS RFC, which used
to be RFC 1034 for IPv4, I don't know what it currently is; the second being
the SMTP RFC, which is believe is RFC
+1
This is actually pretty simple to do. The most complicated piece is forwarding
the email to the new destination! :)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net]
Sent: Monday, February
Trying to move users back from Exchange 2010 to 2003 so we can re-work our
servers. On trying to use the EMC to do a local move it failed griping about
the rules were larger than 32KB and suggested to use the -IgnoreRuleLimitErrors
option. I copied the PS command line from the GUI, and
Do you have a valid routinggroupconnector?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 12:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mailbox
Hi,
You only need to specify the target database in the new-moverequest command
get-mailbox blah | new-moverequest -targetdatabase My Database Name (telstar)
if in doubt do a
get-mailboxdatabase -IncludePreExchange2010 | ft -a
to get the exact db name that you need
Cheers, Chris
Would that cause it to work with the GUI and not with PowerShell? I've been
able to successfully move other mailboxes other than this one using the GUI.
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 11:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange
Oh, no; then they all wouldn't work. I didn't understand that.
Why not just have the user delete rules (export them, actually; then save them
until they can be moved back later, and then reimport them).
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
First off, I've never used a third-party tool to recover or repair a
database. However, I've heard good things about this product:
http://www.lucid8.com/product/digiscope.asp
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Castillo, Daniel (Directory Services)
daniel.casti...@hp.com wrote:
Hi there,
Thanks Harry!
I am not dealing with this case (lucky me cause it stinks) but as I heard
native tools aren’t working to get the stuff fixed L
I’ll keep asking in forums for feedback on this.
Regards,
~D
From: Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 11:58 AM
We have a winner!!! Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Boller [mailto:ch...@mahoola.com]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 11:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mailbox not moving because mailbox store not valid value
for identity
Hi,
You only need to specify the target
Using Outlook 2007 or 2003, I'm simply entering the PF address in the From
field.
CFee
From: Matthew Bullock [mailto:mbull...@root9.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2011 2:42 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Unable to Send-As from Public Folders
Sounds like you are trying to Send on
I thought DNS would return equally weighted MX results in random or round robin
order.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 9:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Load Balancing Incoming Email Using DNS
Ah, but there is no difference.
In RR, you are not guaranteed which is the first, or subsequent, addess to be
returned. Simply that the resolver will return all the addresses in a random
order (without repeats).
Sent from my HTC Tilt™ 2, a Windows® phone from ATT
Hmm, true. (actually one of the MTA's we have includes a check box to
Randomize order of equal MX hosts.)
Our DNS seems to return the following sequence for 3 equally weighted hosts;
1-2-3
2-3-1
3-1-2
1-2-3
Assuming all 3 were always answering, that would give us fairly even
distribution of
We don't use connection filtering (we have appliances to do that) but from the
description, I suspect you are correct that it will see the connecting server
always as your parent company's relay.
Any way to add blackberry.net to a whitelist?
From: Celone,
Hi Carol,
In EMC, Public Folder Management Console, properties of the public folder,
select Mail Flow Settings and Delivery Options. This is where users with Send
on Behalf of are configured. Clear all the users, select OK twice to exit out
of the PF properties. Select the public folder you
29 matches
Mail list logo
