Hello All
I'm in the process of talking to a prospective new client who currently have a
HP ML350 G4p installed October 2005
this machine is coming to the end of it's working life
currently the server is windows server 2003 std with exchange 2003 std
I'm quoting for a new replacement server
You cannot run Exchange 2003 on Windows 2008 of any flavour. You can only run
Exchange 2003 on Windows 2003, and it must be 32 bit. If you want to use 64 bit
windows then you will have to move to 64 bit Exchange, which would be at least
Exchange 2007, but preferably Exchange 2010.
Another
VMWare and P2V FTW. Only thing is to plan for the I/O load of 2003; don't
plan on having a bunch of VMs on that box with Ex2003. Coming from that
old of a server it will likely be faster though.
~JasonG
-Original Message-
From: Laurence [mailto:laurence.chi...@jalapeno-bs.co.uk]
Sent:
More work on this problem this morning (if 5AM can be considered morning).
When I came in outbound email was still flowing, but it was still flowing
workstation-Secondary server-main server-Internet.
As an experiment, I stopped the Exchange Transport service for a few minutes on
the secondary
All
Is anyone using the Exchange 2010 Archive functionality? If so how do you find
it? We have been using the Redgate Exchange server Archiver but this product
is being withdrawn and I need to find a replacement method of archiving user
mail. I also have a load of PST files that I want to
Exchange 2007 SP3 on Server 2008 R2.
I'm trying to set up a performance alert on the counter Aggregate Delivery
Queue Length (All queues) It seemes to setup OK, but it never runs. I have an
icon next to it with an exclamation point in a yellow circle.
Anyone have ideas why it won't work?
Does anyone here have any experience to share about improved performance by
moving their organization from E2K7 to E2K10? Size of org, # of remote users,
and any other relevant information would be great. It can be objective or
subjective...
David Lum
Systems Engineer // NWEATM
Office
I found two bugs in Exchange 2010. They both have to do with services starting
in the proper order. Or in this case the incorrect order.
1) MSExchange ADAccess Event ID's 2601, 2604, 2501 in application logging
every 15 minutes. This happens after every reboot and continues every 15
::knocks wood::
I haven't seen either of these.
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Leedy, Andy ale...@butlerschein.com wrote:
I found two bugs in Exchange 2010. They both have to do with services
starting in the proper order. Or in this case the incorrect order.
1) MSExchange ADAccess
You can address item [1] by hard coding the netlogon SiteName. This is a
Windows problem at its core. Exchange MAY end up coding around it, but they
expect (hope) Windows will address it. Both teams are certainly aware of this
problem.
I've not seen item [2] or heard it discussed. My initial
Unless you are a very large organization, I wouldn't move from 2007 - 2010
for improved performance. It's unlikely (on properly sized servers) that
performance changes would be visible. I would move for things like
OWA-multi-browser capabilities, the Exchange Control Panel (ECP), more
Use your snipping tool and show me a picture. :)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Steve Hart [mailto:sh...@wrightbg.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 12:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Queue length in performance monitor
Darn shame about Redgate's ESA. The market is just too crowded.
I've got Exchange archiving deployed at several customers. Do you have specific
questions about it?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Kevan Dickinson
You can address item [1] by hard coding the netlogon SiteName
I'm not sure how to accomplish. Do I need to edit a file or the registry? Can
you elaborate?
Thanks,
Andy
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 1:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Hi everyone,
Has anyone here ever worked with Beehive and done a migration from it to
Exchange?
Thanks,
Amer Karim
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe
Metalogix Exchange archiver (was Sunbelt Exchange Archiver, same product, can't
remember if Sunbelt still resells it)
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families
From: Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sure. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc937923.aspx
I've done this at several of my clients experiencing that issue.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Leedy, Andy [mailto:ale...@butlerschein.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011
Thanks!
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 2:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Two Exchange 2010 bugs...
Sure. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc937923.aspx
I've done this at several of my clients experiencing that issue.
Applied the registry fix and both issue [1] and [2] are resolved. Not sure how
it could affect [2] but everything seems ok now.
Thanks again!
-Andy
From: Leedy, Andy [mailto:ale...@butlerschein.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 2:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Two Exchange 2010
Excellent. I'm happy to hear that.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Leedy, Andy [mailto:ale...@butlerschein.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 2:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Two Exchange 2010 bugs...
Applied the
Well, I'm getting at least the first issue (but not on all servers; like MBS
said, it's a Windows issue) and implemented the reg key to resolve it.
However, a small percentage of times when my CAS servers restart I've run into
the FBA service not starting. Starting manually always resolves the
Had a similar issue recently with Exchange 2010 on Win2k8 R2 as VMWare
Guest. Once MS statically assigned the site name via the registry entry,
voila!
Cheers,
H
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Sobey, Richard A r.so...@imperial.ac.ukwrote:
Well, I'm getting at least the first issue (but not
I need to design an active-active, site-tolerant configuration for our
migration from E2k3 to E2k10. Question - I realize I need two DAGs.
One with the active database copies in CA and the passive in AZ, and the
other with its active copies in AZ and the passive in CA. Does this
mean 4 mailbox
We're still working this scenario out here, but according to my Exchange
2010 instructor and what we did in lab, you should be able to have
active and passive separate databases residing on the same mailbox
server.
-Paul
From: Phil Hershey [mailto:phers...@agia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03,
I thought that, as Paul says, that a mailbox server can host more than a
single DAG. I certainly prefer your suggestion of 3 replicas, and that
hadn't occurred to me. All will be talking to a site-local NetApp SAN
with redundant filers.
Thanks!
From: Rupprecht, James R
Exchange to Oracle then back again.. What a great customer that was...
-Original Message-
From: Amer Karim [mailto:am...@akisit.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 11:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Oracle Beehive to Exchange migration
Hi everyone,
Has anyone here ever worked
Improved Performance? Is that really a reason to upgrade to 2010? I don't think
it is... Are you trying to sell 2010 your company?
Why you asking..
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 9:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007 - 2010
Thanks Michael and Kevin,
Someone asked me if I thought it would be worth it to jump from 2007 to 2010
for increased performance, my answer was no clue, looked up some info on the
MS site, determined that helped me not at all so I then fired off an e-mail to
you guys :).
Dave
From: KevinM
A mailbox server can host more than a single DATABASE, but a mailbox server can
be a MEMBER of only a single DAG.
From an implementation perspective, a DAG is a windows failover cluster, with
added special sauce. A server can only be a member of a single failover
cluster.
Regards,
Michael B.
That's correct. But the servers (and the mailboxes) will be in a single DAG.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 4:19 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
No. I'm not sure you are completely understanding what a DAG is.
Use more words and tell me what you are trying to do.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Phil Hershey [mailto:phers...@agia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 4:08 PM
To:
Yea! Looks like my training dollars were well spent!
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 5:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DAGs per Mailbox Server
That's correct. But the servers (and the mailboxes) will be in a single
DAG.
To the best of my knowledge, this can only be done via ECP.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 5:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Ex2010 DL Membership
Hi folks. This has probably been discussed at length in the forums, but I
thought I would ask just to see if any thing has changed on opinions for some
good basic/intermediate level Exchange 2010 books.
It seems like I was just getting good with managing Exchange 2000 on SBS, then
went to SBS
34 matches
Mail list logo
