It does work.
Sure, if you add up all the IOPS on all the server then you have more IOPS used
than you would on a single server in RAID5. After all, not only do you write
the data in three separate streams (one per server), you also copy the log
files (one copy per server).
Regards,
Michael
I've been fascinated by this thread. I'm in the planning stages of our Exchange
2010 environment (migrating from 2007), and saw some video sessions from TechEd
which discussed the possibility of JBOD databases in a DAG, single item
recovery turned on, circular logging turned on and no backups be
We run TMG/UAG in parallel with our existing firewall, and only use the TMG/UAG
portion for publishing Exchange and a few web apps via UAG.
The best reason for it is that it blocks unauthenticated attacks against your
CAS/IIS.
Cheers
Matt
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.
Thanks Jamie. In our case we wouldn't be looking at changing outbound traffic
flow since our current box is absolutely to our requirements.
I wouldn't say there's an issue or anything forcing us to look at TMG. I'm
simply aware that it exists and may be a better (by which I mean safer) way to
Oops. Embarrassed. It's worked, but it's also exported the 2.1GB of dumpster,
which is about right for the size of the person's mailbox.
Sorry all.
From: bounce-9437900-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-9437900-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Sobey,
Richard A
S
Hi Greg,
Thanks for your reply.
I'm able to run New-MailboxExportRequest successfully to extract the entire
contents of the mailbox, including the Calendar, but what I want is only the
Calendar. Do you think this is a permissions problem?
Cheers,
Richard
From: bounce-9437326-8066...@lyris.su
