Re: Anyone use Sophos Pure Message for Exchange? On DAGs??

2011-12-13 Thread Adm
We run Scanmail on the CAS/Hubs and on the Mailbox servers. On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Jason Benway wrote: > Are you running it in an exchange 2010 environment? Where do you have it > installed CAS,Hub, or mailbox? > > ** ** > > Thanks,jb > > ** ** > > *From:* Adm [mailto:sms...@g

RE: Hosting with SP2.

2011-12-13 Thread Michael B. Smith
FYI: I verified with the appropriate people in the Exchange product group today that they have no intention of providing detailed step-by-step instructions for multi-tenancy in SP2. I guess I could write one, but that would be a major task. Also, PFs will not be supported. I was also told why, b

RE: Anyone use Sophos Pure Message for Exchange? On DAGs??

2011-12-13 Thread Jason Benway
Are you running it in an exchange 2010 environment? Where do you have it installed CAS,Hub, or mailbox? Thanks,jb From: Adm [mailto:sms...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 1:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Anyone use Sophos Pure Message for Exchange? On DAGs?? We use

Re: Anyone use Sophos Pure Message for Exchange? On DAGs??

2011-12-13 Thread Adm
We use Trend and I wouldn't change for anything. Just works. On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Alice Goodman wrote: > Let me know how that goes for you as well… I am considering just > sticking with my Trend Micro Scan Mail at the moment and not introduce any > sticky challenges as I am still mi

RE: Anyone use Sophos Pure Message for Exchange? On DAGs??

2011-12-13 Thread Alice Goodman
Let me know how that goes for you as well... I am considering just sticking with my Trend Micro Scan Mail at the moment and not introduce any sticky challenges as I am still migrating from 2003 to 2010 and need to re-focus on that and finish. Alice From: Nicholas Turner [mailto:ntur...@caci.co

RE: Hosting with SP2.

2011-12-13 Thread Michael B. Smith
Public folders are a lot harder. Doable, but a lot harder. And, they aren't supported. So, I'm hesitant to tell you how to do something that isn't supported. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.

RE: Hosting with SP2.

2011-12-13 Thread Michael B. Smith
Assume a domain: example.local; also known as dc=example, dc=local. NetBIOS name of domain is EXAMPLE. Create a OU named Hosting; also known as ou=hosting, dc=example, dc=local For each company, create an OU subordinate to Hosting. For example, Company1, Company2, etc. Example:

RE: Hosting with SP2.

2011-12-13 Thread Paul Cookman
Ok, how do you get around having 50 customers and say 3 users called John Smith (JSmith), I tried creating different UPNs so they could log onto OWA separately for each company. us...@company1.com us...@company2.com Also, any info on Public

RE: exchange 2003 test lab

2011-12-13 Thread Jimmy Tran
Thanks, it was a RUS issue and permissions. Jimmy From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 1:46 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exchange 2003 test lab Sounds as if you don't have the recipient update service configured. All

Re: Hosting with SP2.

2011-12-13 Thread Tom Kern
Things are different now. ABPs is not true multi tenancy the way /Hosting was/is. If the desire is to have 2 or more Orgs pointing to the same external contact then you can get away with New-MailContact -Name "Contact A" -ExternalEmailAddress SMTP:t...@test.com–PrimarySmtpAddress a...@a.com New-

RE: Hosting with SP2.

2011-12-13 Thread Michael B. Smith
You are going to have to define what you mean by "same names". You still can. I have a feeling we aren't talking about the same things. Ads for what? Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk] S

RE: Hosting with SP2.

2011-12-13 Thread Paul Cookman
I created 3 separate UPNs and set them to company names and then did the address policy's so they could only see their own users but in regards to the sAMAccountName, with SP1 /Hosting you could give them their own Administrators and users with the same names, what is the work around now then?

RE: Hosting with SP2.

2011-12-13 Thread Michael B. Smith
You have to segregate via OU and it works just fine. You can't have a conflicting sAMAccountName or upn, but otherwise - everything else can be identical. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.