Thanks a lot Dave.
What i don't get clearly is that, in Distribution groups, all you can
select is Exchange Servers, i would have thought that logically to resolve
group members you need a DC rather than an Exchange box.
Anyways all groups were set to use any available server in the
organization.
Given what you're doing, you might also want to look for unmanaged IDs to evict
as part of this new user process.
I've got some code here that can do this, as you can't do it using Exchange
PowerShell in Live@EDU
http://www.stevieg.org/2010/03/checking-for-unmanaged-live-ids-in-outlook-live/
Same thing happened to me, years ago. Rules broken on my mailbox that was moved
from 2007 to 2010 and back again. I'm not sure if I could reproduce it actually.
From: bounce-9530570-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-9530570-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Dave
That is what we've had to do with a handful of devices. From the bottom post in
that link:
Create a second policy - could be identical to the first one really, but check
Allow non-provisionable devices.
Regards,
Don Guyer
Catholic Health East - Information Technology
Enterprise Directory
Also, make sure the device is up to date with patches, O/S level, etc. We've
had some issues with Ice Cream Sandwich (don't get me started with that one),
don't know the version number equivalent off the top of my head. They released
a patch recently that resolved at least one reported issue
It's as current as I can get it, and the ActiveSync policy allows
non-provisionable devices.
I'll try another one of the same model in the unlikely event something is weird
with this specific phone (we had some weird issues getting it activated for the
wireless provider).
What kills me about
I should reiterate, when we find out a device only works with the
non-provisionable policy, we inform the user that their device is not supported
for security reasons and it cannot remain connected.
Regards,
Don Guyer
Catholic Health East - Information Technology
Enterprise Directory
A quick bit of googling reveals this possibility - a PDF linked from here:
http://www.huntonprivacyblog.com/2009/07/articles/germany-adopts-stricter-data-protection-law-serious-impact-on-business-compliance/
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Kat Aylward Langan
messagel...@gmail.com wrote:
We have
Thanks Kurt. I also found this, which is apparently a full translation of
the law, but understanding the implications is where I am stuck. We have
on-prem Exchange but were planning to move about 80% of our users
(including the team the person works for) to O365 in the future. This puts
a
URL included this time!!
http://www.iuscomp.org/gla/statutes/BDSG.htm
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Kat Aylward Langan messagel...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks Kurt. I also found this, which is apparently a full translation of
the law, but understanding the implications is where I am stuck. We
Hmmm, do da phrase company computer play into this at all? Or do you
allow/encourage personal use of company computers?
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 4:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Office365/Exchange and
Looks to me like another nail in the coffin for Google doing business in
Germany..
M
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 4:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Office365/Exchange and German Privacy Rights of
Is Germany a right to work state? :)
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Kat Aylward Langan messagel...@gmail.comwrote:
We have a specific user located in Germany who is refusing to use her
Exchange account if it is moved to Office365 due to her feeling this is a
violation of her rights.
We do have BYOD here but this particular user has a company system.
However, it is the control of the data she seems to have issues with.
Just trying to figure out whether to escalate to our Legal team to
determine what we need to do or if we can counter her arguments with
technical
I believe they are correct.
You will find that O365 has different restrictions dependent upon the country
of usage and some features are flat out not available in some countries.
From: Kat Aylward Langan [mailto:messagel...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 7:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
I think involving your legal staff is a smart thing to do.
Kurt
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Kat Aylward Langan
messagel...@gmail.com wrote:
We do have BYOD here but this particular user has a company system.
However, it is the control of the data she seems to have issues with. Just
16 matches
Mail list logo
