We restrict who can send to groups, and we have a restriction on the number of
recipients per email.
Of course that would not stop multiple emails, but it may make it not worth the
while.
-Robert
From: Stu Packett [mailto:spack...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 11:54 AM
To:
Sounds like HR needs to handle this one.
Sent via BlackBerry by ATT
-Original Message-
From: Stu Packett spack...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:53:53
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issuesexchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Reply-To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
You can export the Exchange cert from one of the other servers:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd351274.aspx
Then import it on the other one you reinstalled
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb310769
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Heaton, Joseph@DFG
This is resolved.
Imported within MMC, and redid the bindings within IIS. Seems to be working
again.
Thanks all :)
Joe Heaton
From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 9:19 AM
To: Heaton, Joseph@DFG; MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Certificate missing
Sounds like a good way to turn them from disgruntled to disemployed.
From: Robert Peterson [mailto:robert.peter...@prin.edu]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 10:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Preventing Disgruntled Employees from Emailing Distribution Lists
We restrict who can
Fire the disgruntled employee. If that has already been done, then
disallow external email to be sent to that DL.
Kurt
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Stu Packett spack...@gmail.com wrote:
Management is trying to find ways to prevent a disgruntled employee from
sending emails to specific
HR is involved, but they have come to us to find ways on the technical side
to prevent future disgruntled employees from doing something like this in
the future.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:21 AM, joesmith...@att.net wrote:
**
Sounds like HR needs to handle this one.
Sent via BlackBerry by
Sorry, I wasn't clear. We're trying to find a solution for future
disgruntled employees. A situation hasn't happened yet, but upper
management wants us to take care of this on the technical side. The
options below is all I have so far.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:21 AM, John Cook
Turn on moderation and disable the + usage then.
HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Office\[14.0][12.0]\Outlook\Options\Mail\DisableDLExpansion=1
Or change the DL's to dynamic...I THINK dynamics cannot be expanded. Test that
idea.
Nothing is going to be perfect, they can still grab from the GAL.then
The old adage about technical solutions to behavioural problems lends itself
here
---Blackberried
-Original Message-
From: Stu Packett spack...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 10:45:18
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issuesexchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Reply-To: MS-Exchange Admin
You could do a million things - but hell, the users could write it down, print
it, take photosits a neverending battle
---Blackberried
-Original Message-
From: Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 18:21:22
To: MS-Exchange Admin
You mean pass the buck. This is a behavioral problem that is ill-suited to
a technical solution. How are you to be informed someone is disgruntled?
Once you know then you can take some actions. You can also restrict who
Can send to certain groups. Certainly restricting access to the entire
I knew it was something like that. But I think it fits this situation very
well.
You can make it hard for a person to misuse the mail service, but you can't
stop them, before the fact, from misusing it.
John M.
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Thursday,
13 matches
Mail list logo
