Here's the situation:
User A has Send on Behalf right (under Exchange General/Delivery Options)
on user B's mailbox, who is a member of an executive management DL.
If user C sends an email to executive management DL and user A has OOO
turned on, will/should user C receive user A's OOO message?
said email, so is there is an additional setting/rule
configured elsewhere to forward/redirect messages sent to User B over to
User A.
*From:* Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Thursday, May 01, 2008 8:18 AM
*To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
*Subject:* Send on Behalf
For what is worth, I actually found that article fixed the problem:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/931667/
Thank you Alex! :)
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Alex Alborzfard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I seem to have the opposite issue in regards to OL TREO:
Recurring Outlook meetings
I seem to have the opposite issue in regards to OL TREO:
Recurring Outlook meetings created before 2007 DST change are displaying 1
hour ahead of schedule for the user and the meeting recipients. If he goes
to the suspect recurring meeting instance in the month of April it shows the
correct
While I don't watch too much sports or TV for that matter, but sometimes I
like to be just entertained.
I have to learn and think so much during the day, that my brain needs a
vacation when I come home.
I like to watch Discovery channel.
Btw I thought couple of the 1st half commercials were
I'm getting this logged in Application log of one of our EX2K3 servers.
I found a Technet article (
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb851495.aspx) that tells you to
look for some registry values, which I cannot find.
How can I fix this or it's not serious and I should just leave it
PROTECTED]
wrote:
What's the number? You only get that warning when you are within 20% of
the maximum limit.
You need to figure out what's creating the named properties.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
*From:* Alex Alborzfard [mailto
that it is creating a custom X-* header. It
shouldn't do that.
To eliminate the properties, you can move a mailbox that contains the
properties to another store.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
*From:* Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL
*From:* Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 22, 2008 12:35 PM
*To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: Event ID 9667
Here are the named properties it's trying to create:
X-TM-IMSS-Message-ID
X-Content-Filtered-By
X-Original-Date
X-TFF-CGPSA-Filter
X
