I doubt this is CC's fault. If they allow you to send directly to their
SMTP servers, ISA is probably taking too long to drop the connection.
--Durf
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Eric Wittersheim
wrote:
> A little side note about constant contact. We use ISA 2004 as our proxy
>
That's what I thought. Time to go collect $$ from junior engineer now. :)
-- Durf
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Michael B. Smith <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Option 2. Downtime: zero. Effective: 100%
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Michael B. Smith, MCIT
gy is
preferable:
1. Move the store via ESM, then defrag.
- or -
2. Create new store, then Move Mailboxes into the new store, remove old
store.
The option that minimizes downtime would be preferable. We're migrating
from local SCSI to iSCSI if it matters in the equation.
Th
populate them and then you can go in there and select all and do a drag and
drop to a public folder. I just tested it.
It's a bit ghetto but I think it will do. Thanks all for the input.
-- Durf
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Michael B. Smith <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I
I'm trying to check their list of SMTP aliases, distribution groups and so
on for completeness so we can migrate them to another solution. Normally
I'd run a script that dumps all that from Active Directory, but in this case
I don't have access to the AD as it is a hosted solutio
Directory?
Thanks,
Durf
--
--
Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day.
Give a fish a man, and he'll eat for weeks!
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
3. Establish SPF records (OK, it doesn't do a lot)
4. Change everyone's SMTP address (the only way to be sure).
-- Durf
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Brumbaugh, Luke <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rule to send to delete folder or permanently delete.
>
>
Right, there's a way on the server side to accomplish this as well, with a
special Public Folder entry, no?
It has been a dog's age since I've had to do so, so I don't have the
reference handy.
-- Durf
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Michael B. Smith <
[EMAIL PROTECTE
t for the people who really need it might not be
too serious.
-- Durf
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Tim Vander Kooi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Add2Exchange scares the Dejesus out of me. We tried it here a year or so
> ago to do exactly what the OP is asking about. It promptly
The new Chapura product will allegedly do this, I hear from a co-worker.
Failing that, Add2Exchange...although that solution is like using a Buick to
swat a fly.
-- Durf
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Clyde Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Customer is using Exchange Server 200
I spotted an integrated 3Com Asterix device at the Network world expo
that looked interesting.
On 8/18/08, David Baca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I am looking at options for a phone system for a
> relatively small office. Currently about five or six people. I am
> interested in V
Two words: Constant Contact. They do exactly this - legitimate mass
emails - and that's all they do, and they are very good at it.
Strongly recommend you look in to outsourcing the email. If it works once
and you pull it off, then you own it forever.
-- Durf
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 6:
Make sure you get a modern version and check for vulns! The venerable
formmail.pl is an ancient exploit vector.
- Durf
On 5/20/08, Michael B. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Google for formmail.php and allow relaying from 127.0.0.1 (localhost). There
> are also versions of form
You know, a little while in Walter Reed might help fix that problem.
Oh, wait - VA care was gutted by your beloved president, and Walter Reed is
a horrorshow.
Well, Semper Fi, dude. Good luck with the puppy-throwing skillz instead,
hope it helps you cope.
-- Durf
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 1:26
Thanks, that's indeed what I was wondering - whether the proper thing would
to have the data volume mounted by ESX, and then mounted by the VM as a 'raw
disk' (if that's still the correct term), or whether it's just as effective
to have the VM do the mount via iSCSI in vir
Can you clarify where you were mounting the volumes? Host or guest?
I'm very curious as to which works better, and if you can effectively
mount iscsi volumes in the vm.
--Durf
On 3/12/08, Joseph L. Casale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Until I simplified my setup at home (noise
Oh, damn. *sigh*
...
...
...
Oh yeah, your server will be fine.
--Durf
On 3/11/08, Michael B. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A.E. van Vogt.
>
>
>
> The World of Null-A.
>
>
>
> I have a signed first edition.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
it, just don't explicitly share
and/or grant permissions to the calendar.
-- Durf
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 1:02 PM, David Mazzaccaro <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You don't' "need" to grant permissions… So CAN you prevent users from
> opening the resource
You don't need to grant Calendar permissions to use the AutoAccept agent,
that's the whole point - it's accepting the meeting, not directly writing
requests to the calendar as with Resource Booking.
-- Durf
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:49 PM, David Mazzaccaro <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
Agree - only one I ever saw was quickly replaced with a 'cuda.
- Durf
On 2/21/08, Jason Gurtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://www.sendio.com/
> > Suppose to block 100% of all spam with zero false positives!
>
> This appears to be a product that does Chal
nd a mass email out to their
entire contact list they've painstakingly build up in an Exchange public
folder (or multiple, given the limits on Exchange address lists...)
-- Durf
On Feb 7, 2008 4:21 PM, Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 7, 2008 2:49 PM, Durf <[EMAIL PR
ng list is.
Look up Constant Contact, and mention to Nancy Freitag that Connor referred
you. They do an amazing job. All they do are (verified, non-spam) mass
mailing, and are extremely professional.
-- Durf
On Feb 7, 2008 1:29 PM, Steve Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> We&
22 matches
Mail list logo
