Re: Can someone settle this....(part 2)

2002-05-10 Thread Missy Koslosky
Title: Message You are correct. - Original Message - From: Garland Mac Neill To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 4:45 PM Subject: RE: Can someone settle this(part 2) Ok, that makes lots of sense Now the argument

RE: Can someone settle this....(part 2)

2002-05-10 Thread Tim Boswell
this(part 2) You are correct. - Original Message - From: Garland Mac Neill To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 4:45 PM Subject: RE: Can someone settle this(part 2) Ok, that makes lots of sense

RE: Can someone settle this....(part 2)

2002-05-09 Thread Garland Mac Neill
Title: Message Ok, that makes lots of sense Now the argument has moved to synchriozation. Like when does it occur. The example being that you open Outlook, you receive an attachment, you open attachmentwhere are you opening it from? I say the server because Outlook does not

RE: Can someone settle this....(part 2)

2002-05-09 Thread MHR(Michael Ross)
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Can someone settle this(part 2) Ok, that makes lots of sense Now the argument has moved to synchriozation. Like when does it occur. The example being that you open Outlook, you receive an attachment, you open attachmentwhere are you

RE: Can someone settle this....(part 2)

2002-05-09 Thread Garland Mac Neill
Issues Subject: RE: Can someone settle this(part 2) Ok, that makes lots of sense Now the argument has moved to synchriozation. Like when does it occur. The example being that you open Outlook, you receive an attachment, you open attachmentwhere are you opening it from? I say

RE: Can someone settle this....(part 2)

2002-05-09 Thread Salvador Manzo
]]Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 13:46To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Can someone settle this(part 2) Ok, that makes lots of sense Now the argument has moved to synchriozation. Like when does it occur. The example being that you open Outlook, you receive