If I have a Cass Server called primary and another Cass called Secondary in a
secondary
location and I have 100 users in a third site with Outlook profiles pointing
to primary and
want to point them to secondary, how would I go about it?
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee332317.aspx
site's cass array?
From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
Sent: 18 June 2012 11:19
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dag Question regarding Cass.
If I have a Cass Server called primary and another Cass called Secondary in a
secondary
location and I have 100 users in a third
Issues
Subject: RE: Dag Question regarding Cass.
Hi,
The databases are all on one mailbox server in an active passive setup and in
my primary site they point to a cass array. In the passive site I can create an
array like your article suggests but I am thinking the users will still need
Subject: RE: Dag Question regarding Cass.
* I also tried the Set-MailboxDatabase name -RPCClientAccessServer
internal_only_CAS_Array_FQDN but it didn't auto configure the clients for
that database, I thought it might of.
From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]
Sent: 18
://www.theucarchitects.com/
Steve
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: 18 June 2012 11:55
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dag Question regarding Cass.
No, once the mail profile has the name of a CAS array, it won't get updated if
you change the RPCClientAccessServer
Subject: RE: Dag Question regarding Cass.
No, once the mail profile has the name of a CAS array, it won't get updated if
you change the RPCClientAccessServer property on the database.
What I think most people do is have a short TTL on the DNS for their CAS Array
name, then change the IP Address
-Outlook
to use the RPC Client Access Server array in the same Active Directory site as
the activated and mounted database
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 6:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dag Question regarding Cass.
No, once
:09
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dag Question regarding Cass.
Owe I see, Like I am doing with the owa.domain.com, I have the URLs set the
same and rely on DNS. So what you are saying is both cas arrays from both sites
can have the same name?
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so
October 2011 08:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DAG Question
The question doesn't compute. :)
The issue, as I believe another poster pointed out, is that reaching quorum is
impossible with an even number of live servers that don't have access to the
FSW. The cluster will go offline
: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: 26 October 2011 19:26
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DAG Question
The question doesn’t compute. :)
The issue, as I believe another poster pointed out, is that reaching quorum is
impossible with an even number of live servers
Thanks all I believe I now have all I need.
Regards
Phil
From: Peter Johnson [mailto:peter.john...@peterstow.com]
Sent: 27 October 2011 07:48
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DAG Question
Hi Philip
If you can find it online check out Scott
?)
Sorry – I know this all sounds really dumb ☺
Richard
From: bounce-9451031-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-9451031-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Young,
Philip
Sent: 27 October 2011 14:57
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DAG Question
Thanks Peter
-us/library/dd979790.aspx
Missy
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 10:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DAG Question
I’m having real trouble getting my head around this. I’ve implemented – and
tested – our DAG and it seems
...@notsoclever.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 11:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DAG Question
No, your situation isn’t really that different because of the odd number of
servers. MSFT says that you should keep the FSW local to the primary datacenter
for the DAG, and use an alternate
We are planning an Exchange 2010 rollout and plan an 8-node DAG with 4
members in Site A and 4 in Site B and the FSW in Site C. Are there any
drawbacks with doing it this way? Anybody have any good reasons why we
shouldn't do this?
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Phil
Yes. That could lead you to having quorum issues.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Young, Philip [mailto:philip.yo...@covance.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 9:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: DAG Question
We
in the same site.
From: Young, Philip [mailto:philip.yo...@covance.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 9:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: DAG Question
We are planning an Exchange 2010 rollout and plan an 8-node DAG with 4 members
in Site A and 4 in Site B and the FSW in Site C
-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DAG Question
Yes. That could lead you to having quorum issues.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Young, Philip [mailto:philip.yo...@covance.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 9:37 AM
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Young, Philip [mailto:philip.yo...@covance.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 10:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DAG Question
Ok thanks Michael. One reason for posting my question was that I could not find
anyone else who had done
...@smithcons.com]
Sent: 26 October 2011 19:26
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DAG Question
The question doesn't compute. :-)
The issue, as I believe another poster pointed out, is that reaching quorum
is impossible with an even number of live servers that don't have access
suggest that in a split site
setup with active/active config to use 2 DAGs so a site link failure does not
affect users at each site.
From: Young, Philip [mailto:philip.yo...@covance.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 3:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DAG Question
Ok apologies
.
http://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/v144-of-the-Exchange-2010-1912958d
From: Senter, John
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 3:47 PM
To: 'MS-Exchange Admin Issues'
Subject: RE: DAG Question
Phil,
If you are paying a consultant/architect to come up with that design I strongly
suggest you replace
!
Regards
Phil
_
From: Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com]
Sent: 26 October 2011 20:51
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DAG Question
One more thing, take a look at the Exchange 2010 Mailbox Server Role
Calculator. The guys that work on this have done an excellent job
:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DAG Question
Phil,
If you are paying a consultant/architect to come up with that design I strongly
suggest you replace him now because he does not know Exchange 2010. So what
does this person suggest when site C goes down and you do not have
My understanding is that to implement mailbox resiliency in Exchange 2010,
you must have the Enterprise edition of the OS on each server in the DAG.
When I run Dell's Exchange 2010 advisory tool at
I think Window Enterprise Edition is still required since a DAG still uses
pieces of Windows Failover Clustering
Glen
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 8:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: 2010 DAG question
My understanding
Yep, you definitely need the enterprise edition for the clustering components
that are installed when you join them to the DAG
Chris
From: Richard Stovall [rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: 21 December 2010 14:06
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: 2010 DAG question
You are correct, the tool is wrong.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 9:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: 2010 DAG question
My understanding
:* Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, December 21, 2010 9:06 AM
*To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
*Subject:* 2010 DAG question
My understanding is that to implement mailbox resiliency in Exchange
2010, you must have the Enterprise edition of the OS on each server
: Re: 2010 DAG question
Thank you Glen, Chris, and Michael.
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Michael B. Smith
mich...@smithcons.commailto:mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
You are correct, the tool is wrong.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.comhttp
Subject: Re: 2010 DAG question
Thank you Glen, Chris, and Michael.
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Michael B. Smith
mich...@smithcons.commailto:mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
You are correct, the tool is wrong.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.comhttp
-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] *On Behalf Of *Richard
Stovall
*Sent:* 21 December 2010 14:25
*To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: 2010 DAG question
Thank you Glen, Chris, and Michael.
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com
wrote:
You
Explain please.
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 1:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 2010 DAG question
However – you don’t need Enterprise Edition of Exchange ☺ Just to confuse
matters..
From: bounce-9212080-8066
.
Webster
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Subject: RE: 2010 DAG question
Explain please.
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Subject: RE: 2010 DAG question
However – you don’t need Enterprise Edition of Exchange J Just to confuse
matters
I know that this question has probably been asked several times but i can't
find the answer:
I have several small sites that I need Exchange 2010 servers in and wanted to
know if I could put CAS/HUB role on a MB server and use DAG for the databases?
These sites are geographically dispersed
. You'll need Windows Server Enterprise to get the clustering
services for your DAG though.
From: phil levine [mailto:plevin...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 8:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: DAG Question
I know that this question has probably been asked
thanks.
--- On Wed, 11/17/10, Todd Arnett tarn...@lastar.com wrote:
From: Todd Arnett tarn...@lastar.com
Subject: RE: DAG Question
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Date: Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 10:08 AM
DAG shouldn’t be a problem. We have a box
So you can build a CAS Array on Server Standard?
Dave Wade
Business Services I.C.T.
0161 474 5456
From: Todd Arnett [mailto:tarn...@lastar.com]
Sent: 17 November 2010 15:09
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DAG
Yes. A RPCCAA is nothing more than a logical entity.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Dave Wade [mailto:dave.w...@stockport.gov.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 10:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DAG Question
So
Correct.
From: Dave Wade [mailto:dave.w...@stockport.gov.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 10:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DAG Question
So you can build a CAS Array on Server Standard?
Dave Wade
Business Services I.C.T.
0161 474 5456
, November 17, 2010 10:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DAG Question
DAG shouldn't be a problem. We have a box at one of our remote sites setup this
way. If you wanted to do a CAS Array, it won't work. DAGs use Windows
Clustering Service, and CAS uses Network Load Balancing Service which
.)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com http://theessentialexchange.com/
*From:* Todd Arnett [mailto:tarn...@lastar.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 17, 2010 10:09 AM
*To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: DAG Question
DAG
:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: DAG Question
Michael,
To your knowledge, does NetScaler fall into that list?
- Sean
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Michael B. Smith
mich...@smithcons.commailto:mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
You can also use an external load balancer, such as IAS
://TheEssentialExchange.com http://theessentialexchange.com/
*From:* Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 17, 2010 12:55 PM
*To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: DAG Question
Michael,
To your knowledge, does NetScaler fall into that list
quick question that i feel kinda silly about asking; if i have several DAG's
setup and my firewall in one location is taken down this weekend will the DAG
automatically pick up in the second location or do i need to manually mount the
databases in the second location? these are all RTM
I would think that if it's a known downtime, I'd personally manually make the
one that's going to stay up the Active node. But it should failover
automatically, that's what the DAG is for.
phil levine plevin...@yahoo.com 10/20/2010 7:46 AM
quick question that i feel kinda silly about
,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 10:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: DAG Question
I would think that if it's a known downtime, I'd
: Joseph Heaton jhea...@dfg.ca.gov
Subject: Re: DAG Question
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Date: Wednesday, October 20, 2010, 10:50 AM
I would think that if it's a known downtime, I'd personally manually make the
one that's going to stay up the Active node
48 matches
Mail list logo
