]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001
6:52 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS via
MX records
Hi,
Is
this a problem? All the time I thought this is okay.
My
setup is slightly different. We have our own domain
with
two internal IMS servers, one cost 10 and another 20
change Adminsitrator
National Institute of Education
Nanyang Technological University
Singapore
-Original Message-From: Benjamin Zachary
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, December 11,
2001 4:58 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: DNS via
MX records
Hey guys Im
, December 10, 2001
6:40 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS via
MX records
no
real store front... the name is registered in FL.
--
Kevinm M WLKMMAS,
UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST
-Original Message-From: Arnold, Jamie
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Se
: RE: DNS via
MX records
Their are all kinds of reasons for that happening..
most of them are not DNS : > might be simpler if you do not have anything
setup at the ISP to forward the messages to just take that DNS entry out, and
wait for the server that could not get to you to
res
.
-Original Message-From: Kevin Miller
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001
6:40 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS via
MX records
no
real store front... the name is registered in FL.
--
Kevinm M WLKMMAS,
UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST
ange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS
via MX records
We
own the domain names : >
--
Kevinm M WLKMMAS,
UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST
-Original Message-From: Arnold,
Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December
10, 2001 3:29 PMTo
ange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS via
MX records
We
own the domain names : >
--
Kevinm M WLKMMAS,
UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST
-Original Message-From: Arnold, Jamie
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001
3:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSub
Title: Message
We own
the domain names : >
--
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA,
CKWSE CKST
-Original Message-From: Arnold, Jamie
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001
3:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS via
MX records
Hm...We h
o: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS via
MX records
Their are all kinds of reasons for that happening..
most of them are not DNS : > might be simpler if you do not have anything
setup at the ISP to forward the messages to just take that DNS entry out, and
wait for the server that c
BTW
just noticed the sender.. How it website coming?
--
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA,
CKWSE CKST
-Original Message-From: Benjamin Zachary
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10,
2001 12:58 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: DNS
via MX records
Hey guys
Title: Message
Hey guys Im not a
dns guru but Im thinking something is possibly wrong with the way this is
configured or maybe my understanding..
We have 2 mx records
10 IN and 20 IN. The 20 is our ISP as a backup mail route. The problem is
although we have no downtime (monitoring with s
11 matches
Mail list logo