RE: DNS via MX records

2001-12-11 Thread Benjamin Zachary
]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 6:52 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS via MX records Hi,   Is this a problem?  All the time I thought this is okay. My setup is slightly different.  We have our own domain with two internal IMS servers, one cost 10 and another 20

RE: DNS via MX records

2001-12-11 Thread ONG Liang Bu (CSC)
change Adminsitrator National Institute of Education Nanyang Technological University Singapore -Original Message-From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 4:58 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: DNS via MX records   Hey guys Im

RE: DNS via MX records

2001-12-10 Thread Benjamin Zachary
, December 10, 2001 6:40 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS via MX records no real store front... the name is registered in FL.     -- Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST -Original Message-From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Se

RE: DNS via MX records

2001-12-10 Thread Benjamin Zachary
: RE: DNS via MX records Their are all kinds of reasons for that happening.. most of them are not DNS : > might be simpler if you do not have anything setup at the ISP to forward the messages to just take that DNS entry out, and wait for the server that could not get to you to res

RE: DNS via MX records

2001-12-10 Thread Benjamin Zachary
. -Original Message-From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 6:40 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS via MX records no real store front... the name is registered in FL.     -- Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST

RE: DNS via MX records

2001-12-10 Thread Kevin Miller
ange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS via MX records We own the domain names : >     -- Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST -Original Message-From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 3:29 PMTo

RE: DNS via MX records

2001-12-10 Thread Arnold, Jamie
ange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS via MX records We own the domain names : >     -- Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST -Original Message-From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 3:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSub

RE: DNS via MX records

2001-12-10 Thread Kevin Miller
Title: Message We own the domain names : >     -- Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST -Original Message-From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 3:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS via MX records Hm...We h

RE: DNS via MX records

2001-12-10 Thread Arnold, Jamie
o: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS via MX records Their are all kinds of reasons for that happening.. most of them are not DNS : > might be simpler if you do not have anything setup at the ISP to forward the messages to just take that DNS entry out, and wait for the server that c

RE: DNS via MX records

2001-12-10 Thread Kevin Miller
BTW just noticed the sender.. How it website coming?     -- Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST -Original Message-From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 12:58 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: DNS via MX records   Hey guys

DNS via MX records

2001-12-10 Thread Benjamin Zachary
Title: Message   Hey guys Im not a dns guru but Im thinking something is possibly wrong with the way this is configured or maybe my understanding..   We have 2 mx records 10 IN and 20 IN. The 20 is our ISP as a backup mail route. The problem is although we have no downtime (monitoring with s