Hi All,
I recall seeing a document talking about the problems associated with
merging the public folder server and mailbox server onto one server.
Can anyone point me to that?
We are in the process of consolidating our NT/Exchange 5.5 servers into a
windows 2000/Exchange 2000 environment. My
of it comes down to the size of your org...?
Thanks
Rob Wilcox
-Original Message-
From: Rodney Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 July 2002 19:27
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000 Server Sizing
Hi All,
I recall seeing a document talking about the problems associated
Hello,
I know this thread comes and goes, but our main reseller for the past 6
years sold his business and I don't trust the new owner, also we are an HP
shop and now I guess we will be buying compaq servers.
We will be deploying Exc2000 standard later this summer,
+/- 100 users
we have about
RAID5 is very beneficial for the databases. I would sacrifice RAID1 for
the OS/logs to get that.
-Original Message-
From: David Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 3:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000 Server Sizing
Hello,
I know
Server Sizing
RAID5 is very beneficial for the databases. I would sacrifice RAID1 for
the OS/logs to get that.
-Original Message-
From: David Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 3:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000 Server Sizing
Hello
