, all the file duties are handled by an SVN box next
door and sharepoint is on a separate server too.
Olly
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 August 2008 16:05
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007, memory usage, and hunt
Roosevelt; 1907
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 12:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007, memory usage, and hunt the thimble
What leads me to ask? Well partly a general curiosity. Having a server
who's
://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Bingham, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 10:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007, memory usage, and hunt the thimble
You start with the easy step of following one of the memory planning
guides, like
This one's useful, perhaps:
Understanding Exchange 2007 Memory Usage and its use of the Paging
File
http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2008/08/06/449484.aspx
Cheers,
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Networks Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith
Hi chaps,
If the store.exe process of Exchange 2007 is designed to consume as much
memory as it can in order to bring the much vaunted (though I would say
much missing) speed improvements, then how do you know when your server
needs a memory upgrade?
What I mean is that, if the memory is always
sources, you're probably good.
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 7:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007, memory usage, and hunt the thimble
Hi chaps,
If the store.exe process of Exchange 2007
-
From: Bingham, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 10:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007, memory usage, and hunt the thimble
You start with the easy step of following one of the memory planning
guides, like the simple one in TechNet:
http
As well as the other recommendations, the good old When the users
complain that responsiveness is poor could be a good sign :)
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 August 2008 15:21
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007, memory usage
: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 10:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007, memory usage, and hunt the thimble
As well as the other recommendations, the good old When the users
complain that responsiveness is poor could be a good sign :)
-Original Message-
From: Oliver
understanding it can be part of normal operation and not
indicative of a problem.
-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 10:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007, memory usage, and hunt the thimble
Yep
Thanks. You were the only response.
Curt
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 4:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 memory usage
Did you get any response to this?
In my experience
,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Jim Dandy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 2:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007 memory usage
For those who are using MS Exchange 2007, is you
For those who are using MS Exchange 2007, is you total commit charge (K)
larger than your Physical Memory (K)? (You can find this information
in your Windows Task Manager.) On my Exchange server, my amount of
committed memory is larger than the amount of physical memory.
Exchange is supposed
13 matches
Mail list logo
