Re: Exchange 2010 Disk Configuration

2011-08-02 Thread Harry Singh
ms) cost less than half of what a single 240 disk > SAN frame would have cost. > > MS says their SAS failure rates are about 2 1/2 percent a year... this is > about what we are seeing too. > > > > From: Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011

RE: Exchange 2010 Disk Configuration

2011-08-02 Thread Rupprecht, James R
failure rates are about 2 1/2 percent a year... this is about what we are seeing too. From: Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2010 Disk Configuration Apologize for the semi-hijack, but what kind of disks

Re: Exchange 2010 Disk Configuration

2011-08-02 Thread Brian McGloin
> ** ** >> >> Phil Hershey >> >> Caprinteria, CA >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* Brian McGloin [mailto:sms...@gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 02, 2011 10:44 AM >> >> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues >>

Re: Exchange 2010 Disk Configuration

2011-08-02 Thread Harry Singh
New deployments have been DAS, almost exclusively. > > > > Regards, > > > > Michael B. Smith > > Consultant and Exchange MVP > > http://TheEssentialExchange.com > > > > *From:* McCready, Rob [mailto:rob.mccrea...@dp

Re: Exchange 2010 Disk Configuration

2011-08-02 Thread Brian McGloin
> ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Brian McGloin [mailto:sms...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 02, 2011 10:44 AM > > *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Exchange 2010 Disk Configuration > > ** ** > > We're seeing it costing about $

RE: Exchange 2010 Disk Configuration

2011-08-02 Thread Phil Hershey
hange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: McCready, Rob [mailto:rob.mccrea...@dplinc.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 9:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2010 Disk Configuration Greetings Gurus, We currently h

Re: Exchange 2010 Disk Configuration

2011-08-02 Thread Brian McGloin
t;>>>>> impossible – but I’d say it’s atypical. >>>>>> >>>>>> ** ** >>>>>> >>>>>> The only clients I have that are using SAN already have a large SAN >>>>>> investment. New deployments have been DAS, a

RE: Exchange 2010 Disk Configuration

2011-08-02 Thread Michael B. Smith
DAS is generally much cheaper than SAN. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 1:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2010 Disk Configuration Out of

RE: Exchange 2010 Disk Configuration

2011-08-02 Thread Michael B. Smith
c.com>] Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 9:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2010 Disk Configuration Greetings Gurus, We currently have 400GB worth of data on our Exchange 2007 setup. From what I've read, we can expect that to double or triple when we move to Exchange 2

Re: Exchange 2010 Disk Configuration

2011-08-02 Thread Harry Singh
> impossible – but I’d say it’s atypical. >>>>> >>>>> ** ** >>>>> >>>>> The only clients I have that are using SAN already have a large SAN >>>>> investment. New deployments have been DAS, a

Re: Exchange 2010 Disk Configuration

2011-08-02 Thread Steve Ens
; >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> ** ** >>>> >>>> Michael B. Smith >>>> >>>> Consultant and Exchange MVP >>>> >>>> http://TheEssentialExchange.com >>>> >>>>

Re: Exchange 2010 Disk Configuration

2011-08-02 Thread Brian McGloin
** >>> >>> Consultant and Exchange MVP >>> >>> http://TheEssentialExchange.com >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> *From:* McCready, Rob [mailto:rob.mccrea...@dplinc.com] >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 02, 2011 9:06 A

Re: Exchange 2010 Disk Configuration

2011-08-02 Thread Steve Ens
ith >> >> Consultant and Exchange MVP >> >> http://TheEssentialExchange.com**** >> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* McCready, Rob [mailto:rob.mccrea...@dplinc.com] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 02, 2011 9:06 AM >> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues >

Re: Exchange 2010 Disk Configuration

2011-08-02 Thread Brian McGloin
om:* McCready, Rob [mailto:rob.mccrea...@dplinc.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 02, 2011 9:06 AM > *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues > *Subject:* Exchange 2010 Disk Configuration > > ** ** > > Greetings Gurus, > > We currently have 400GB worth of data on our Exchange 2

RE: Exchange 2010 Disk Configuration

2011-08-02 Thread Paul Hutchings
Sent: 02 August 2011 14:06 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2010 Disk Configuration Greetings Gurus, We currently have 400GB worth of data on our Exchange 2007 setup. From what I've read, we can expect that to double or triple when we move to Exchange 2010 and lose single i

Re: Exchange 2010 Disk Configuration

2011-08-02 Thread Todd Lemmiksoo
Have a look/read here : http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2011/01/07/robert-s-rules-of-exchange-storage-planning-and-testing.aspx On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 8:06 AM, McCready, Rob wrote: > Greetings Gurus, > > We currently have 400GB worth of data on our Exchange 2007 setup. From > wh

RE: Exchange 2010 Disk Configuration

2011-08-02 Thread Michael B. Smith
yments have been DAS, almost exclusively. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: McCready, Rob [mailto:rob.mccrea...@dplinc.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 9:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2010 Disk Configuration

Exchange 2010 Disk Configuration

2011-08-02 Thread McCready, Rob
Greetings Gurus, We currently have 400GB worth of data on our Exchange 2007 setup. From what I've read, we can expect that to double or triple when we move to Exchange 2010 and lose single instance storage. What type of disk configuration are you using for 2010? Local disks or a SAN? Thanks,