hings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 1:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 on vSphere - Redundancy?
That's what I don't understand tbh - why the server/exchange should know or
care about any HA/vmotion stuff happening to the VM
Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Sent: 07 September 2010 18:38
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 on vSphere - Redundancy?
+1
Just went down this road with a large design I had to do with a
customer. What I did is have two MBX servers, that will be placed on
separ
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 1:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 on vSphere - Redundancy?
Not hot spare as in automatic failover or anything, that's overkill for us, but
the plan (not just Exchange but in
ailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: 07 September 2010 18:37
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 on vSphere - Redundancy?
Hmm the devil really is in the detail isn't it. I've not yet dug into the
nitty gritty just the headlines/demos - so that's something else t
From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 1:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 on vSphere - Redundancy?
+1
Just went down this road with a large design I had to do with a customer. What
I did is have two MBX servers, that will be placed on
0 18:42
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 on vSphere - Redundancy?
Are you talking about having a hot site in the second location for
failover? That's a job for Site Recovery Manager. Tuning Exchange
depends on number of mailboxes, Public folders, Full outlook (cached
m
hange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 on vSphere - Redundancy?
Hmm the devil really is in the detail isn't it. I've not yet dug into the
nitty gritty just the headlines/demos - so that's something else that's new.
OK let's start again :)
Assuming two separate loc
with?
From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Sent: 07 September 2010 18:38
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 on vSphere - Redundancy?
+1
Just went down this road with a large design I had to do with a
customer. What I did is have two MBX servers, that wi
Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 on vSphere - Redundancy?
Not supported.
You choose a particular HA technology to use and stick with it.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Tu
ent: 07 September 2010 18:31
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 on vSphere - Redundancy?
You have to keep in mind that Fault Tolerance in VSphere is still
restricted to one processor and that's not going to change anytime real
soon. If you need high availability (whi
thcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 1:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 on vSphere - Redundancy?
Not supported.
You choose a particular HA technology to use and stick with it.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: 07 September 2010 18:23
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 on vSphere - Redundancy?
Not supported.
You choose a particular HA technology to use and stick with it.
Regards,
Michael B.
Subject: Exchange 2010 on vSphere - Redundancy?
We're currently using Exchange 2003 but should be going to 2010 in the next few
months.
In terms of performance, a single server should do the job, so that leaves
redundancy.
I'm interested in peoples experiences of things like vSp
We're currently using Exchange 2003 but should be going to 2010 in the
next few months.
In terms of performance, a single server should do the job, so that
leaves redundancy.
I'm interested in peoples experiences of things like vSphere Fault
Tolerance combined with things like DAG groups?
14 matches
Mail list logo
