Does anyone have RBL providers to recommend or stay away from?
Steve
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
What are the top RBL's you are using these days?
> http://www.asspsmtp.org/wiki/DNSBL
That's an excellent list, thanks for putting it together!
~JasonG
--
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
4:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RBLs
Does anyone have RBL providers to recommend or stay away from?
Steve
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark
This is my write-up about which DNSBLs (also referred to as RBLs) that
I use and why:
http://www.asspsmtp.org/wiki/DNSBL
On Jan 17, 2008 4:17 PM, Steve Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have RBL providers to recommend or stay away from?
>
> Steve
>
> ~ Ninj
Agreed. Thank you Michael!
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 1:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RBLs
> http://www.asspsmtp.org/wiki/DNSBL
That's an excellent list, thanks for putting it
You're welcome - I'm glad it helps!
--
ME2
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
>
> If you can count your money, you don't have a billion dollars.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 4:18 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RBLs
>
> Does anyone h
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 2:01 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: RBLs
This is my write-up about which DNSBLs (also referred to as RBLs) that I
use and why:
http://www.asspsmtp.org/wiki/DNSBL
On Jan 17, 2008 4:17 PM, Steve Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
orthy son to live under the
> Stars and Stripes." Woodrow Wilson
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 2:01 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: RBLs
>
> This is my wri
iday, January 18, 2008 9:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: RBLs
There are certainly "bad" DNSBLs out there. I actually dedicated a
section of that article to listing which popular ones to be careful of,
and why.
But, who specifically do you mean by "they" ?
On
That is a good example John.
RBLs have grown up though. Some are pretty specific about what they block
from geographic source to connection method (ie. dialup) and some are
responsive to queries.
I have used Spamhaus for years, and I have not had to deal with them either.
-Original
ionality is no worthy son to live under the
> Stars and Stripes." Woodrow Wilson
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 9:04 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: RBLs
>
I started using SpamCop and spamhaus a while ago to keep my spam filter from
bursting into flames, and the results were fantastic, until recently when
about 80 of Gmails servers wound up on SpamCops Block list. Sure the expire
hourly if they stop spamming the spamtraps, but I'm missing 5-10 out of
Trend's ERS - used to be MAPS. Not free if that's important.
From: Bill Songstad [mailto:bsongs...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 1:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: RBLs
I started using SpamCop and spamhaus a while ago
We also use Trend along with SpamHaus...
From: Don Andrews [mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com]
Sent: February-10-11 6:32 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RBLs
Trend's ERS - used to be MAPS. Not free if that's important.
From: Bil
Songstad [mailto:bsongs...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 4:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: RBLs
I started using SpamCop and spamhaus a while ago to keep my spam filter from
bursting into flames, and the results were fantastic, until recently when
about 80 of Gmails
, Florida
(561) 747-6107
_
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 9:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Top RBLs
What are the top RBL's you are using these days?
_
If this email is spam, report it here:
spamcop
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 9:00 AM
Subject: Top RBLs
What are the top RBL's you are using these days?
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Top RBLs
What are the top RBL's you are using these days?
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read,
distribute or copy this e-mail. P
Dave, it seems like I tried Zen some time back and it was blocking a lot of
mail from things like yahoo, etc. Do you see that?
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:d...@parkviewmc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 8:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Top RBLs
This is what I have
t;
>
> *From:* Eldridge, Dave [mailto:d...@parkviewmc.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 06, 2009 8:44 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Top RBLs
>
>
>
> This is what I have Ninja/Vipre using these days.
>
> Zen.spamhaus.org <http://zen.spamh
o:mblackst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 11:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Top RBLs
Dave, it seems like I tried Zen some time back and it was blocking a lot of
mail from things like yahoo, etc. Do you see that?
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:d...@parkviewmc.com]
Sent: Tuesda
Not that I have heard from my users.
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 9:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Top RBLs
Dave, it seems like I tried Zen some time back and it was blocking a lot
of mail from things like yahoo
I also use the zen list also but first in the list is spamcop and for the last
week this is the report I get for my RBLs. Seems like they are both pretty
similar lists.
RBL ServerOccurrences
bl.spamcop.net127563
zen.spamhaus.org34
- Original Message -
From
e
> last week this is the report I get for my RBLs. Seems like they are both
> pretty similar lists.
>
> RBL ServerOccurrences
> bl.spamcop.net127563
> zen.spamhaus.org34
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Martin Blackstone
> *To:* MS-E
I use multi.surbl.org
No complaints with that.
Kind Regards,
Vincent
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 20:05
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Top RBLs
Spamhaus's Zen and (SpamCop Black List) SCBL are no
I found SpamCop to be too aggressive when I enabled it several years
back - I lost mail, too. Spamhaus has never been and problem for me.
Roger Wright
___
"The internet is a great way to get on the net." – Bob Dole
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Bill Songstad wrote:
> I started using Spa
- Fax
-Original Message-
From: Roger Wright [mailto:rhw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 1:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT: RBLs
I found SpamCop to be too aggressive when I enabled it several years
back - I lost mail, too. Spamhaus has never been and problem f
Ditto. SpamCop can be useful for weighting, but can be dangerous for
blocking.
--
ME2
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Roger Wright wrote:
> I found SpamCop to be too aggressive when I enabled it several years
> back - I lost mail, too. Spamhaus has never been and problem for me.
>
>
> Ro
If you arent, I highly recommend implimenting greylisting prior to RBL
filtering.
--
ME2
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Bill Songstad wrote:
> I started using SpamCop and spamhaus a while ago to keep my spam filter
> from bursting into flames, and the results were fantastic, until recentl
hursday, February 10, 2011 1:46 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: OT: RBLs
>
> I found SpamCop to be too aggressive when I enabled it several years
> back - I lost mail, too. Spamhaus has never been and problem for me.
>
>
> Roger Wright
> ___
>
>
+100 on greylisting. As soon as GFI offered Greylisting, I implemented it.
We immediately saw a significant decrease in the amount of spam that was
coming through. Now, most of the spam that consistently makes it through we
find is due to the "admin" [1] who put in manual wildcard exclusions...the
I don't have any greylisting capable software at this time, (using Exchange
2010 and Vipre Email security) but I'm not sure it would be a good fit in
my organization because we run a discussion list through the exchange
transport. Wouldn't greylisting put unreasonable lag in the discussions?
-Bi
Subject: Re: OT: RBLs
Wouldn't greylisting put unreasonable lag in the discussions?
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Take a look at JEPs. There is a free version, but it also very inexpensive.
BF
From: Bill Songstad [mailto:bsongs...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 1:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT: RBLs
I don't have any greylisting capable software at this time, (
. There is a free version, but it also very
> inexpensive.
>
>
>
> BF
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Bill Songstad [mailto:bsongs...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 1:01 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: OT: RBLs
>
>
>
> I don't h
37 matches
Mail list logo
