I concur on their less than ideal support but once set up the software is
pretty much set and forget.
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families
- Original Message -
From: Evan Brastow [mailto:ebras...@automatedemblem.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 02:39 PM
To:
Why do you want to get the data off the Exchange server? Exchange now has
fairly minimal requirements for i/o so you no longer need high performance
storage. Since SP1 whilst the archives MUST be on AN Exchange server it does
not need to be the same server that the primary database is on. Even
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Archiving (again)
I concur on their less than ideal support but once set up the software is
pretty much set and forget.
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families
- Original Message -
From: Evan Brastow [mailto:ebras
I have to ask, how was this estimate arrived at?
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families
- Original Message -
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 09:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Archiving (again
Data expands to fill the storage available
-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 9:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Archiving (again)
Our biggest issue with Sunbelt is that they were totally wrong in the
rived at?
> John W. Cook
> Systems Administrator
> Partnership for Strong Families
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 09:10 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Archiving
No matter how big you build it, they will fill it.
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 9:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Archiving (again)
Data expands to fill the storage available
-Original
5456
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: 14 March 2012 13:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Archiving (again)
-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 9:11 AM
T
I don't remember all details, but basically average number of emails/day and
length of time we wanted to keep them.
-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 8:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Archiving (again)
I
Yep, I call it the fish tank principle around here.
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 8:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Archiving (again)
Data expands to fill the storage available
-Original
will help :)
Thanks,
Evan
-Original Message-
From: Dave Wade [mailto:dave.w...@stockport.gov.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 5:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Archiving (again)
Why do you want to get the data off the Exchange server? Exchange now has
fairly minimal requir
al Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 9:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Archiving (again)
Our biggest issue with Sunbelt is that they were totally wrong in the estimate
of how much storage was required. What was suppos
: Archiving (again)
I don't remember all details, but basically average number of emails/day and
length of time we wanted to keep them.
-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 8:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Archiving (
hive mailbox won't I be back to ~2003-2007
server requirements because of all the "online" mailboxes?
jb
-Original Message-
From: Evan Brastow [mailto:ebras...@automatedemblem.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 10:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Archiving
> My bigger issue is a concern about something else he told me - that he has
> "seen many times" where
> updating to SP2 rollup 1 "completely bombs the server and it has to be
> restored from backups."
Yeah, sure... And MS has not seen it, but he has? Don't you think it would be
pulled if it we
rvice-pack-2.aspx
Regards,
Michael B.
-Original Message-
From: Evan Brastow [mailto:ebras...@automatedemblem.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 10:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Archiving (again)
My current issue is that although the install was supposed to be done
Well, since I have very few users, everyone is online anyway. Not an issue for
me... yet :)
Thanks,
Evan
-Original Message-
From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 11:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Archiving (again)
With
could be quite disturbing to your business should it
happen.
Evan
-Original Message-
From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 11:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Archiving (again)
> My bigger issue is a concern about some
Thanks Michael... exactly what I needed!
Evan
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 11:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Archiving (again)
Malarkey. Tell him he's fully of it. And that I said so. :-)
4, 2012 11:25 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Archiving (again)
>
> > My bigger issue is a concern about something else he told me - that he
> > has "seen many times" where updating to SP2 rollup 1 "completely bombs
> the server and it has to
).
-Original Message-
From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 11:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Archiving (again)
With Exchange archive mailboxes aren't they accessed "online" so the clients
being always connect
com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 10:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Archiving (again)
Malarkey. Tell him he's fully of it. And that I said so. :-)
But yes, I have a process/procedure of the proper way to prepare for installing
service packs and update rollups to minimize
.com]
Sent: 14 March 2012 16:51
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Archiving (again)
> My bigger issue is a concern about something else he told me - that he has
> "seen many times" where
> updating to SP2 rollup 1 "completely bombs the server and it has to be
>
>Hmm... didn't think I was beating a dead horse... that's the first time I
>asked that question :)
>
>I was only asking the list to see if people had had any experience that was
>similar to this tech's.
>Thought it might be a prudent thing to do when someone tells you something
>that could be qu
ank you
jb
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 2:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Archiving (again)
Cache mode has an impact, yes, but far less than the impact associated with
RPC/HTTP vs. online mode.
The primary
ificatesForExchange.com/ for certificates from just $26.99.
> Need a domain for your certificate? http://DomainsForExchange.net/
>
> Exchange Resources: http://exbpa.com/
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
> Sent: 14 Marc
Hi Joseph,
No problem at all, my friend. I wasn't offended... merely bewildered... lol
Thanks,
Evan
-Original Message-
From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 3:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Archiving (again)
Actually, it ain’t that big a deal. A PITA, but not that bad. I’ve been called
in to fix it a couple of times.
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 4:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Archiving (again)
Holy smokes. That is one hateful
Nope.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 4:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Archiving (again)
Didn't know there was a difference between RPC/HTTP vs. online mode
I thought it was cache vs non-cach
embee.co.uk/
>
> Need cheap certificates for Exchange, compatible with the iPhone?
> http://CertificatesForExchange.com/ for certificates from just $26.99.
> Need a domain for your certificate? http://DomainsForExchange.net/
>
> Exchange Resources: http://exbpa.com/****
>
>
>
them
asking. That does require developing a certain level of trust that I won’t take
advantage of them either…
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 10:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Archiving (again)
I guess it's a matter of degrees
on’t charge anything just for them
> asking. That does require developing a certain level of trust that I won’t
> take advantage of them either…
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 14, 2012 10:22 PM
>
> *To
advantage of them either…
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 14, 2012 10:22 PM
>>
>> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>> *Subject:* Re: Archiving (again)
>>
>> ** **
>>
&
ange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Archiving (again)
Does MBS travel that far? :-)
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Richard Stovall
mailto:rich...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Makes sense. I don't have a consultant handy*, but I would definitely do some
serious research before emarking on a recovery
Actually, I didn’t know that. I know that Sean is down that way, but for some
reason I thought you were in the UK. :-P
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 8:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Archiving (again)
Makes sense. I don't h
ailto:rich...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 15, 2012 8:53 AM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Archiving (again)
>
> ** **
>
> Makes sense. I don't have a consultant handy*, but I would definitely do
> some serious rese
u were in the UK. :-P
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 15, 2012 8:53 AM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Archiving (again)
>
> ** **
>
> Makes sense. I don't have a consultant ha
37 matches
Mail list logo
