Name Server MasterServerOrAvailabilityGroup RpcClientAccessServer
-- - -
HA-Mailbox-01 EXMB-01 DAG-01 EXCAS-01.italy.local
HA-Mailbox-02 EXMB-01 DAG-01 EXCAS-02.italy.local
Joseph,
Thanks for testing this, but it only shows that you
Of Jay
Kulsh
Sent: 08 March 2012 10:34
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DAG and CAS-Array (or CAS server)
Name Server MasterServerOrAvailabilityGroup RpcClientAccessServer
-- - -
HA-Mailbox-01 EXMB-01 DAG-01 EXCAS-01.italy.local
Message-
From: Jay Kulsh [mailto:jayku...@csi.com]
Sent: 08 March 2012 10:34
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DAG and CAS-Array (or CAS server)
Name Server MasterServerOrAvailabilityGroup RpcClientAccessServer
-- - -
HA-Mailbox
Of course,
How could they allow such a config if the moment you failed one db over it
would error?
That would be total breakage.
From: Jay Kulsh [jayku...@csi.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 3:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DAG and CAS
Maybe I've just had a long day, but I don't understand your question.
-Original Message-
From: Jay Kulsh [mailto:jayku...@csi.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 7:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: DAG and CAS-Array (or CAS server)
For a DAG, can there be separate CAS servers
As far as I know, the RpcClientAccessServer setting is mailboxdb specific
unbounded by the DAG.
My 2 cents though are such that if your db is redundant and you have a single
point of failure in a CAS server, thats somewhat counter intuitive to HA.
If your DB points to a CAS server in another
It is well known that you need 2 DAG and minimum 4 Exchange servers in 2 sites
if you want both sites active.
This implies that one DAG can be accessed by a CAS only at one site at a time.
Does this clear it up (Just pulled from a mock recovery env)?
[PS] C:\Get-DatabaseAvailabilityGroup
Name