RE: Exchange 2010 archive question

2009-12-17 Thread Michael B. Smith
You don't have to specify a date range for the retention hold; which effectively does what you are requesting. You could also set the deleted item retention for that individual user to an extremely high value. However, I would suggest that if you have an employee you trust that little - you shou

RE: Exchange 2010 archive question

2009-12-17 Thread Oliver Marshall
r> From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: 17 December 2009 13:35 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 archive question You don't have to specify a date range for the retention hold; which effectively does what you are requesting. You could also set the

RE: Exchange 2010 archive question

2009-12-18 Thread Martin Tuip
Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com] Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 11:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 archive question It's not about trust. It's about compliance. -- G2 Support Network Support : Online Backups : Server Management Web: www.g2s

RE: Exchange 2010 archive question

2009-12-18 Thread Michael B. Smith
[mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com] Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 2:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 archive question It's not about trust. It's about compliance. -- G2 Support Network Support : Online Backups : Server Management Web: www.g2support.com Twitter: g2su

RE: Exchange 2010 archive question

2009-12-18 Thread Jason Gurtz
> It's not about trust. It's about compliance. If you have a SAN, there may be features available there (WORM storage) for compliance scenarios. ~JasonG