You're expecting me to change my display font so I can read that?
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 July 2002 02:00
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED
True true. Rather have Flash.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 13:12
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
Powerpoint is so last millenium.
-Original Message-
From: Tom
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
From: Abercrombie, Sherry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 09:04:08 -0500
X-Message-Number: 14
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all
5.5 server HACKED!
With all due respect to Her Foofy Majesty, any of you who aren't mailing
in plain text are Providers of Foof to us text/text digest subscribers.
Including the person who complained about it (monster disclaimer,
non-edited post, and all - oy). It all shows up as markup code
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
JET RED, not JET Blue, was used for Exchange 4.0 because the original code was purchased from the team in England upon which the current 5.5 flavor was final of. XCHG2K was a change of most of the code. For those that have looked into the depths
far behind,
and we can dance...
Its the ASCII Dance, the ASCII Dance.
----
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 7:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
La La La La
I
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
Okay, I'll have to accept the label of Foof Queen. Well at least I have some official letters to put behind my name now...
Sherry Abercrombie - FQ
Data Center Administration Team
Information Technology
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
LOL!!!
great foof.
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 8:04
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5
server HACKED!
Okay, I'll have to accept the label
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:17
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5
server HACKED!
LOL!!! great foof.
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 8:04
AMTo: M
Title: Message
Now I
don't have an excuse to wear my sunglasses when I read my
email.
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 8:43
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5
server HACKED!
:) I
ve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17,
2002 9:43 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
Now
I don't have an excuse to wear my sunglasses when I read my
email.
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL
Title: Message
"Blinded by the Light!!"
Thanks
all is right in the world.
Joe
Sunglasses
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:03
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5
server HAC
Title: Message
Looking cool isn't enough of an excuse?
-Original
Message-From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:43 AMTo: MS-Exchange
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server
HACKED!
Now I don't have an excuse
Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 July 2002
16:03To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange
5.5 server HACKED!
I'm
always thinking of others so, here's a little reason for you to wear your
sunglasses ;)
Sherry
Abercrombie - FQ Data Center Administration Team I
Title: Message
I
don't have to try to be clever - I have a proven track
record.
-Original Message-From: Szalkiewicz, Toni
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 17 July 2002
16:08To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange
5.5 server HACKED!
This resource
Title: Message
Sherry,
I've
wondered how much thrust does it require?
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:03
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5
server HACKED!
I'm
always thinking
k, Kevin S (ITD)
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:52
AM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server
HACKED!
I
don't have to try to be clever - I have a proven track
record.
-Original Message-From: Szalkiewicz, Toni
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
Title: Message
Can
you open my milk, mommy?
-Original Message-From: Matthew
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17,
2002 11:15 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re:
Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
I have never seen this guy before. How are we
Title: Message
Stop
pissing on yourself then.
-Original Message-From: Matthew
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17,
2002 11:15 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re:
Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
I have never seen this guy before. How are we
: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
LOL!!! great foof.
-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 8:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED
al Message-From: Jeremiah Watson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002
10:14 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
Sherry,
I've
wondered how much thrust does it require?
-Original Message-From: Abercromb
ALWAYS Clever.
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server
HACKED!
This resource is not for showing off, please keep the comments
relevant to the issues and do
uesSubject: RE:
Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
Humm ...
You call yourself an Exchange Admin ... believe you have a right to attempt to
correct a group like this ... and you obviously lake a sense of
humor.
Nah, you
must be kidding.
:-D
BTW This
resource is for
(and did you notice how when I reply to the 16k email it turns into a 2k
email?)
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:35 AM
To: 'MS-Exchange Admin Issues'
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
I personally think nobody who calls themselves
page (with popups and marquee tags and embedded
midi files) at http://wasteofbandwidth.org
-Original Message-
From: Purviance, Chad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
Humm
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
(and did you notice how when I reply to the 16k email it turns into a 2k
email?)
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:35 AM
To: 'MS
: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
After reading the evils of HTML email:
http://www.georgedillon.com/web/html_email_is_evil.shtml
I still like it.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com
Powerpoint is so last millenium.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
You don't have people sending the junk to your text pager or cell phone
Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
Powerpoint is so last millenium.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
You don't have people
]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
Would you suggest they flash him instead?
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From
Clever.
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July
17, 2002 10:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server
HACKED!
This resource is not for showing off, please keep the comments
relevant to the issues and do not pad-out
extremities. I have been hacked before, and
relayed off of before. They are two very distinct feelings of violation.
- Original Message -
From: Dan Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:54 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED
-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
Actually, no.. if you can telnet to the mail server you can relay. No
hacking needed. This is by the very nature of exchange. I would recommend
looking at not allowing characters like %$! Through your firewall. Here's a
link to check to see
AM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
Actually, no.. if you can telnet to the mail server you can relay. No
hacking needed. This is by the very nature of exchange. I would recommend
looking at not allowing characters like %$! Through your firewall. Here's a
link to check to see if you have
: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 09:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
OK, does anyone have a list of the ports Exchange 5.5
uses, besides 25 110?
Also, if anyone wants to look at the Event Logs, simply
click on:
http://www.rogue-admins.com
: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
OK, does anyone have a list of the ports Exchange 5.5 uses,
besides 25 110?
Also, if anyone wants to look at the Event Logs, simply click
on:
http://www.rogue-admins.com/dansworld
and not leave port110 available.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 7:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
OK, does anyone have a list of the ports Exchange 5.5 uses,
besides 25 110
Sorry, I don't get it
- Original Message -
From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:11 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
This is a FAQ, and I'm afraid to post the link for fear that Matthew
will flame
Logs look good to me. I'd turn the logging back down, though, if you're
happy with it.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 09:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
OK, does
Figures!
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
Sorry, I don't get it
- Original Message -
From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS
!
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
I have that thread in a .pst somewhere.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 8:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
Hey Dan! You never did get back
in the thread.]
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxb.htm
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
Sorry, I don't get it
- Original
That is not nice Don.
If he is trying to make me feel badhe failed.
- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:21 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
Figures!
-Original Message
less-experienced admins rather than answer their question.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
That is not nice Don.
If he is trying
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
That is not nice Don.
If he is trying to make me feel badhe failed.
- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:44 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
From your post in the thread entitled Mailbox Backup
[patronizing tone]
Like we all said, this has been covered repeatedly every two weeks or
so. Read the FAQS
was
to denigrate less-experienced admins rather than answer their question.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
That is not nice Don.
If he
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
That is not nice Don.
If he is trying to make me feel badhe failed.
- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
Whatever Don. I am not really sure why we are even having
this conversation. I guess it is because the list is slow, eh?
- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday
Yeah, he's got the whole NTSYSADMIN list broken...
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 12:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
The [LIST ADMIN] was and continues to be working
To be more thorough, you should have routed Inigo Montoya to /dev/null ;0)
- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:10 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
I route discussions
LOL!
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
Hey Dan! You never did get back to Ed Woodrick on this list all those
years ago as to why
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
Hey Dan! You never did get back to Ed Woodrick on this list all those
years ago as to why Exchange uses an Access database as an engine
format!
-Original Message-
From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 16 July 2002 15:55
Posted
Not.
-Original Message-
From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 06:38
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
Actually, no.. if you can telnet to the mail server you can relay. No hacking needed.
This is by the very nature
The 4188 errors are typical if you ARE relay secure, you use 'only
authenticated users can relay' and others try.
Where do you think you are 'hacked'?
-Original Message-
From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 8:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
The 4188 errors are typical if you ARE relay secure, you use 'only
authenticated users can relay' and others try.
Where do you think you are 'hacked'?
-Original Message-
From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Subject: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED
Is it connected to the internet?
-Original Message-
From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
The server is not in production yet: There should be NO SMTP
traffic
Yes, it's connected, and the DNS servers have been pointed at it for about a
week...
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
Is it connected to the internet?
-Original Message-
From: Dan Schwartz
Then it's sorta in production then, yes?
Was there a concern other than the 4318's?
-Original Message-
From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
Yes, it's connected
59 matches
Mail list logo
