I haven't tested myself yet, but have read this is fixed in SP2 Update Rollup 3:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2695836
Steve
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: 06 June 2012 16:02
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Migrating big mailboxes from 2003 to
10065-6399
Voice 212.327.8937
Mobile 646.438.5160
fax 212.327.8712
salf...@rockefeller.edu
www.rockefeller.edu
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 10:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Migrating big mailboxes from 2003 to 2010
Be mindful of your
Issues
Subject: RE: Migrating big mailboxes from 2003 to 2010
No, not really. Be aware that 2010 has a default maximum mailbox size of 2 GB,
so you will need to adjust that before starting your moves.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Al Rose
Sent: 6/6/2012 10:25
Thanks Michael
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Michael B. Smith wrote:
> No, not really. Be aware that 2010 has a default maximum mailbox size of
> 2 GB, so you will need to adjust that before starting your moves.
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> --
> From: Al Rose
>
, 2012 10:43 AM
> *To*: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject*: RE: Migrating big mailboxes from 2003 to 2010
>
>
> I have migrated larger mailboxes than that with few issues.
>
> ** **
>
> You'll need to make sure that they aren't over either the destination
&
Be mindful of your log growth.
John W. Cook
Network Operations Manager
Partnership for Strong Families
From: Steve Goodman [mailto:st...@stevieg.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 10:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Migrating big mailboxes from 2003 to 2010
I have migrated
