...@smithcons.com
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Exchange 2013 AV on 2012
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 14:12:12 +
Forefront Endpoint Protection.
Anything that runs on Server 2012 should be fine, as long as you apply the
Exchange exclusions.
From: Jean-Paul N [mailto:jnat
I didn't say FOPE. I said FEP.
From: Jean-Paul N [mailto:jnat...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 10:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2013 AV on 2012
I thought they were discontinuing it ?
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/exchangesvrgeneral/thread
Your load balancer is reporting their address instead of the source IP address.
That might be something you want to change.
Otherwise, I'm not sure why you think you have a problem? It sounds as if you
are just getting a lot of email.
From: Tom Miller [mailto:tominyorkt...@gmail.com]
Sent:
How exactly would I go by testing this on my end? Or would I have to test
it through the app?
Thanks
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.comwrote:
There are a couple of valid ways to specify the domain. That is not one
of them. Do this instead:
** **
transports.
From: Todd Lemmiksoo [mailto:tlemmik...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 6, 2013 11:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2010 TLS setup question
Is there a document that walks one through the process. All articles I have
read talk about importing certificates
.
** **
Make sure the certificate for that FQDN is loaded on the exchange servers
with the mapped hub transports.
** **
*From:* Todd Lemmiksoo [mailto:tlemmik...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Monday, May 6, 2013 11:39 AM
*To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: Exchange 2010 TLS setup
be used for
originating.
** **
Make sure the certificate for that FQDN is loaded on the exchange servers
with the mapped hub transports.
** **
*From:* Todd Lemmiksoo [mailto:tlemmik...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Monday, May 6, 2013 11:39 AM
*To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re
for that FQDN is loaded on the exchange
servers with the mapped hub transports.
** **
*From:* Todd Lemmiksoo [mailto:tlemmik...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Monday, May 6, 2013 11:39 AM
*To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: Exchange 2010 TLS setup question
** **
Is there a document
It does not require an edge server.
From: Todd Lemmiksoo [mailto:tlemmik...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 6, 2013 11:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2010 TLS setup question
Subject: Exchange 2010 TLS setup question
We currently have Exchange 2010 SP1 no rollups. Two
Is there a document that walks one through the process. All articles I have
read talk about importing certificates on the Edge server and running
powershell commands there.
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.comwrote:
It does not require an edge server.
Yes I see that now ☺
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, May 3, 2013 1:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2013 Port Reference?
I answered that in another post.
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:r...@finnesey.com]
Sent: Friday, May 3, 2013 1:31 PM
Has Microsoft said why they will not make one available?
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2013 9:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2013 Port Reference?
You know, shoot me if I'm out of line here, but I couldn't help but read
I answered that in another post.
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:r...@finnesey.com]
Sent: Friday, May 3, 2013 1:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2013 Port Reference?
Has Microsoft said why they will not make one available?
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com
Wikipedia updated!
Frank Wayne
Senior Systems Analyst, Collaboration Services
From: Rick Berry [mailto:rbe...@elevativenetworks.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 01 May, 2013 15:10
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2013 Port Reference?
You spotted it, makes you responsible
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Richard Stovall rich...@gmail.com wrote:
(That said, the original request for a port reference document seems
extremely reasonable. The fact that one will not be made available is,
well, bizarre.)
The usual explanation is that Exchange requires so many ports
with swiss-cheese firewalls was a top support challenge for escalation
engineers for very little benefit. So it’s no longer supported.
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2013 9:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2013 Port Reference?
You know
on the local server where it is
running.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 3:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2013 Port Reference?
There is not one and Microsoft has said that there will not be one.
And the answer to your
Thanks. Would you say yes to 717, too, for outbound proxy?
Frank Wayne
Senior Systems Analyst, Collaboration Services
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 01 May, 2013 14:17
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2013 Port Reference
. There is no hub transport
service in Exchange 2013.
But thank you for the link! :)
Frank Wayne
Senior Systems Analyst, Collaboration Services
From: Rick Berry [mailto:rbe...@elevativenetworks.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 01 May, 2013 14:31
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2013 Port Reference
You spotted it, makes you responsible for the Wikipedia edit. Get crackin'.
8^)
From: Frank R Wayne [mailto:frank.wa...@northwestern.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 4:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2013 Port Reference?
I saw that, too. It was kind of helpful
Hi Robert,
I you have a large numbers of users , then i suggest you to add them into
one single group and allow permissions on that group to send emails to the
list.
Thank you,
Ravi
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Robert cato.rob...@gmail.com wrote:
We have a DL for our entire
Not to my knowledge.
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:r...@finnesey.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 11:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange on AWS?
So I was at the AWS Summit today in New York and one of the session was talking
about EC2 instances that supported guaranteed IOPS
Is there a KB with more info on what they support on EC2? All I have been able
to find is what is supported on Azure.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 12:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange on AWS?
Not to my knowledge
If the actual body of the message is empty and the encrypted email is
transmitted as an attachment to the email, it could be the same bug.
I would want to see the message in .msg or .eml format before making a
conclusion (and CSS would ask for that before handing you the IU).
From: Shanks,
Are you using TLS?
If not, ignore the message.
Otherwise, you can set the default SMTP certificate to the good one.
From: Rene de Haas [mailto:rene.deh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 5, 2013 5:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange Transport error 12016, sites certificate
If you need it, and try not to run it, you'll get a pre-req failure later on.
So you are fine. Go for it.
-Original Message-
From: Connolly, Peter [mailto:pjc...@buffalo.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2013 2:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2010 is
Is it even supported yet by BB?
John W. Cook
Network Operations Manager
Partnership for Strong Families
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 11:01 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Exchange 2013 + BES
Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2013 + BES 10
Is it even supported yet by BB?
John W. Cook
Network Operations Manager
Partnership for Strong Families
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 11:01 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt
Issues
*Subject:* Re: Exchange 2013 + BES 10
** **
Is it even supported yet by BB?
John W. Cook
Network Operations Manager
Partnership for Strong Families
*From*: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.commich...@smithcons.com]
*Sent*: Monday, April 01, 2013 11:01 AM
as of tomorrow. I have no inside
knowledge of that, it is just what I’ve heard.
** **
*From:* John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
*Sent:* Monday, April 1, 2013 11:25 AM
*To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: Exchange 2013 + BES 10
** **
Is it even supported yet by BB?
John W
://domainsforexchange.net/
Exchange Resources: http://exbpa.com/
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: 01 April 2013 16:06
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2013 + BES 10
Talk about bleeding edge...
From: justino garcia [mailto:jgarciaitl...@gmail.com]
Sent
: Monday, April 01, 2013 12:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2013 + BES 10
Blackberry and Exchange 2013 is a mess.
As things stand, today (could all change tomorrow)...
You can use BES 10 with Exchange 2013 without any issues because it uses
ActiveSync for the final connection
Byod at its best )))
From: Guyer, Don [mailto:dgu...@che.org]
Sent: Monday, April 1, 2013 1:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2013 + BES 10
I just setup a Z10, using straight EAS, as a test. If you are tying down EAS
using the device's S/N (similar to a Droid or iDevice
Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2013 + BES 10
Byod at its best )))
From: Guyer, Don [mailto:dgu...@che.org]
Sent: Monday, April 1, 2013 1:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2013 + BES 10
I just setup a Z10, using straight EAS, as a test. If you are tying down EAS
using
*Subject:* RE: Exchange 2013 + BES 10
** **
Byod at its best )))
** **
*From:* Guyer, Don [mailto:dgu...@che.org]
*Sent:* Monday, April 1, 2013 1:31 PM
*To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: Exchange 2013 + BES 10
** **
I just setup a Z10, using straight EAS, as a test
.*
[image: Description: Description: Description: InfoService-Logo240]
** **
*From:* Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
*Sent:* Monday, April 01, 2013 1:38 PM
*To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: Exchange 2013 + BES 10
** **
Byod at its best )))
** **
*From
:* Monday, April 01, 2013 1:38 PM
*To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: Exchange 2013 + BES 10
** **
Byod at its best )))
** **
*From:* Guyer, Don [mailto:dgu...@che.org]
*Sent:* Monday, April 1, 2013 1:31 PM
*To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: Exchange 2013
: justino garcia [mailto:jgarciaitl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 2:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2013 + BES 10
My friends in the healthcare field says BYOD means Bring your own Disaster.
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:27 PM, justino garcia
jgarciaitl
| Cell: 610.955.6528 | Fax: 610.271.9440
For immediate assistance, please open a Service Desk ticket or call the
helpdesk @ 610-492-3839.
[cid:image001.jpg@01CE2EE9.918D7E70]
From: Adm [mailto:sms...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 2:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange
Thanks Mike,
Kinda figured that
- Original Message -
From: Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 8:39:16 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007/Office365 Hybrid Question
The official
The official answer is “all of them”.
From: Mike Tavares [mailto:miketava...@comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 7:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007/Office365 Hybrid Question
Got what should be an easy question, but can’t seem to find an answer for it.
The Prereq
Implement archiving first. Shrink down all the mailboxes. Trying to migrate a
450 GB mailbox is... well a pain.
Once you get that done, then look at planning out your migration to Exchange
2010. One server on this side of the pond, one on the other. This will help out
with your PF's, if you're
Ah - shrinking mailboxes. That's an excellent point.
Manager is intent on getting Exchange consolidated, but realizes need
for better bandwidth overseas.
That seems like a reasonable plan.
Kurt
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:58 PM, John Matteson john.matte...@gmail.com wrote:
Implement archiving
Is this a single user experiencing this or is everyone? This, in my
experience, usually results from a misconfigured authentication setting on
an IIS folder or a permissions problem.
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Lynden A. Philadelphia
lphiladelp...@philadelphiagroup.com wrote:
We have an
Everyone
Lynden
P THINK GREEN before you PRINT SCREEN
From: Peter Johnson [mailto:johnson.pet...@gmail.com]
Sent: March-07-13 10:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2007
Is this a single user experiencing this or is everyone? This, in my experience,
usually results from
before you PRINT SCREEN*
*From:* Peter Johnson [mailto:johnson.pet...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* March-07-13 10:37 AM
*To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: Exchange 2007
Is this a single user experiencing this or is everyone? This, in my
experience, usually results from a misconfigured
Johnson [mailto:johnson.pet...@gmail.com]
Sent: March-07-13 10:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2007
Is this a single user experiencing this or is everyone? This, in my
experience, usually results from a misconfigured authentication setting on an
IIS folder
Is your Exchange cert expired?
From: Lynden A. Philadelphia [mailto:lphiladelp...@philadelphiagroup.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 10:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007
We have an Exchange Server 2007 and Outlook 2010.
Every time a user starts his outlook it asks for
Haven't changed anything; but there was an exchange server in another location
that has been decommissioned.
Lynden
P THINK GREEN before you PRINT SCREEN
From: Peter Johnson [mailto:johnson.pet...@gmail.com]
Sent: March-07-13 11:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2007
What do you mean a hybrid config?
Lynden
P THINK GREEN before you PRINT SCREEN
From: Tanya Pinetti [mailto:tpine...@outlook.com]
Sent: March-07-13 11:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2007
I've seen this with a hybrid configuration when the ADFS is offline
One was but it now has been renewed
Lynden
P THINK GREEN before you PRINT SCREEN
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: March-07-13 11:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007
Is your Exchange cert expired?
From: Lynden A. Philadelphia
It is likely that your exchange's secure certificate has expired. See
http://www.msexchangegeek.com/2009/04/24/how-to-renew-a-self-signed-certificate-in-exchange-server-2007/
Warmest regards
Howard Coates - Director
[Description: cid:image001.png@01C7D884.989B0F50]
IT, Internet Networking
a 2007 exchange box, and I'm just
guessing poorly ...
From: Howard Coates [mailto:h...@coatesconsulting.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2013 12:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007
It is likely that your exchange's secure certificate has expired. See
http
That is not the one I am having an issue with.
Lynden
P THINK GREEN before you PRINT SCREEN
From: Rick Berry [mailto:rbe...@elevativenetworks.com]
Sent: March-07-13 12:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007
Are you sure you're on 2007 Exchange? Out of curiosity, I went
, March 04, 2013 10:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 SP3 and OWA ECP directory
-identity server\ecp
Is the proper syntax. If it fails, share the error.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Tom Miller
Sent: 3/4/2013 4:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange
It astounds me that that works.
From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@sfgtrust.com]
Sent: Monday, March 4, 2013 2:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 SP3 and OWA ECP directory
I got it. I used the following syntax:
new-ecpvirtualdirectory -externalurl
https
Maybe it's a bug. :)
DAMIEN SOLODOW
Systems Engineer
317.447.6033 (office)
317.447.6014 (fax)
HARRISON COLLEGE
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 2:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 SP3 and OWA ECP directory
It astounds
it worked.
And I'm astounded that you are astounded.
Tom
From: Michael B. Smith [mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 2:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 SP3 and OWA ECP directory
It astounds me that that works.
From: Tom
if...
Is sent to 'Inside the organization'
Rule mode
Enforce
Version: 15.0.1.0
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 4:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2013 ignoring Mailflow rule
This is the problem: Audit
...@beachcomp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 9:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2013 ignoring Mailflow rule
Exchange admin center Mail Flow Rules
Test Rule
If the message...
Apply to all messages
Do the following...
Append the message with the disclaimer 'dssddsdsds
: RE: Exchange 2010 SP3, SP2 RU6 released...
Thanks MBS.
It's in the release notes for SP3. It was actually there for SP2, too:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj965774%28v=exchg.141%29.aspx#BKMK_DatabaseSchemaUpgrades
I'm trying to think of a situation that would even let this happen
Bigfish is forefront online protection for exchange or exchange online
protection.
Use whichever name you prefer.
From: xyz [mailto:x...@minneapolis.edu]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 6:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: EXCHANGE 2010 What is bigfish.com?
Greetings,
We are EXCHANGE
MS Forefront.
From: xyz [mailto:x...@minneapolis.edu]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 3:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: EXCHANGE 2010 What is bigfish.com?
Greetings,
We are EXCHANGE 2010 SP2 UR3 - just for an FYI.
When troubleshooting internet email issues I often see
Is the current SAN certificate a publicly issued one??
Sent on the run!
On 21 Feb 2013, at 15:45, Connolly, Peter pjc...@buffalo.edu wrote:
All,
We are preparing to deploy Exchange 2010 and will coexist with Exchange
2007. Is it possible to generate the CSR for the certificate from an
Of course. You just need to ensure you include all the required namespaces.
-Original Message-
From: Connolly, Peter [mailto:pjc...@buffalo.edu]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 8:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2010 generate CSR
All,
We are preparing to deploy
If you get a digicert one then you can amend the names on the certificate as
many times as you like during the lifetime of the cert.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: 21 February 2013 14:26
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 generate CSR
Of course
Yes - Comodo.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Johnson [mailto:johnson.pet...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 9:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2010 generate CSR
Is the current SAN certificate a publicly issued one??
Sent on the run!
On 21 Feb 2013
Fysh [mailto:tobie.f...@freebridge.org.uk]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 7:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 generate CSR
If you get a digicert one then you can amend the names on the certificate as
many times as you like during the lifetime of the cert.
From: Michael
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 generate CSR
If you change any of the original names on the cert, they will revoke the
original one before they reissue it. That may be an issue if you can't replace
the original cert quickly. You can add names to it without revoking the
original, but you have to pay
, February 21, 2013 12:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 generate CSR
Thanks Tim - this may be an issue for us. Our original cert contains invalid
FQDN's, and they will no longer be issued after November 1st, 2015 (according
to http://www.networking4all.com/en/ssl
, February 15, 2013 1:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2013 ignoring Mailflow rule
You are going to have to give us the details of exactly - and I mean exactly
- what you did to create the rule.
From: Beach Computers Web Hosting [mailto:gro...@beachcomp.com]
Sent: Friday
I am not aware of an easy way to do this in Exchange 2003. :(
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 4:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2003 and a calendaring question
All,
We have recently let go someone who
You may end up having to keep the account active until two months past the last
meeting date.
I was told about a tool that's been around for a bit MFCMAPI that might be of
some use.
John M.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19,
And if you're not aware, it's a high probability it doesn't exist.
Frowny emoticon indeed.
Well, the only bright point is that I can hand this off to junior
members of the team.
Kurt
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
I am not aware of an easy way
MFCMAPI == handing a 3yo the loaded shotgun and saying have fun!
It of course doesn't help that I'm not allowed to enforce meeting
duration limits - so they're all without any end dates.
Looks like it's time to get manual...
Kurt
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:30 PM, John Matteson
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 5:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 and a calendaring question
MFCMAPI == handing a 3yo the loaded shotgun and saying have fun!
It of course doesn't help that I'm not allowed to enforce meeting duration
limits - so they're
.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 5:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 and a calendaring question
MFCMAPI == handing a 3yo the loaded shotgun and saying have fun!
It of course doesn't help that I'm
MFCMAPI is more like bringing a machine gun to a knife fight.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 and a calendaring question
Don't get me wrong - I've used
:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 and a calendaring question
Don't get me wrong - I've used MFCMAPI a few times, and it's a very cool tool.
I just don't want to incorporate it into a termination process.
I could be wrong, but I think regedit is like bringing
:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 and a calendaring question
Don't get me wrong - I've used MFCMAPI a few times, and it's a very cool tool.
I just don't want to incorporate it into a termination process.
I could be wrong, but I think regedit is like bringing
Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 and a calendaring question
Don't get me wrong - I've used MFCMAPI a few times, and it's a very cool tool.
I just don't want to incorporate
I'm sorry, please give me a link. I'll ask for it to be clarified.
No, the upgrade dismounts the databases on the current copy. Which should all
be passive.
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 10:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE
-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-9582527-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Michael
B. Smith
Sent: 15 February 2013 15:32
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 SP3, SP2 RU6 released...
I'm sorry, please give me a link. I'll ask for it to be clarified
You are going to have to give us the details of exactly - and I mean exactly -
what you did to create the rule.
From: Beach Computers Web Hosting [mailto:gro...@beachcomp.com]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 1:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2013 ignoring Mailflow rule
Hi
, February 15, 2013 1:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2013 ignoring Mailflow rule
You are going to have to give us the details of exactly - and I mean exactly
- what you did to create the rule.
From: Beach Computers Web Hosting [mailto:gro...@beachcomp.com]
Sent: Friday
Entire RU6.
From: Adm [mailto:sms...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 2:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange Patch MS 13-012
If I go to this patch at MS,
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/ms13-012, then click on
the Exchange 2010 SP2 link under
Thank you
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.comwrote:
Entire RU6.
** **
*From:* Adm [mailto:sms...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, February 14, 2013 2:20 PM
*To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
*Subject:* Exchange Patch MS 13-012
** **
If I go to
Yep.
Sent from my Galaxy S®III
Original message
From: Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife joseph.hea...@wildlife.ca.gov
Date:
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 SP3, SP2 RU6 released...
Management console installs? You mean
-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 SP3, SP2 RU6 released...
Different loop.
From: Knoch, James W [mailto:james.kn...@intergraph.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 5:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2010 SP3, SP2 RU6 released...
Saw this via their Twitter account
Any schema changes? Not seeing anything in the KB but don't want a surprise.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: February 12, 2013 06:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 SP3, SP2 RU6 released...
Yes: CAS, HT, MT, UM, MB
If you have ET, do them
.)
From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:peter.kret...@associatedbank.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 8:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 SP3, SP2 RU6 released...
Any schema changes? Not seeing anything in the KB but don't want a surprise.
From: Michael B. Smith
...@associatedbank.com]
Sent: 13 February 2013 13:33
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 SP3, SP2 RU6 released...
Any schema changes? Not seeing anything in the KB but don't want a
surprise.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: February 12, 2013 06:17 PM
To: MS
February 2013 14:43
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 SP3, SP2 RU6 released...
As is becoming depressingly common with MS's documentation, the wording
isn't completely precise, and leaves room for ambiguity.
The release notes
(http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library
Here in the UK the following is showing:
Exchange Server 2013
15137
15449
13236
Maybe need a refresh somewhere ;-)
From: Paul Gordon [mailto:paul_gor...@hotmail.com]
Sent: 13 February 2013 16:43
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 SP3, SP2 RU6 released...
A colleague
Does restarting MsExchangeTransport do anything at all?
What do your queues look like?
From: Reimer, Mark [mailto:mark.rei...@prairie.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 3:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2010 SP1 EdgeTransport.exe eating up all memory
Subject says it
: pramatow...@mediageneral.com [mailto:pramatow...@mediageneral.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 5:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2010 SP3, SP2 RU6 released...
Who wants to go first?
/not me, I can't remember if it's the odd or even ones you have to look out
No… that is an entirely different issue.
Brandon
From: Leedy, Andy [mailto:ale...@butlerschein.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 2:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 SP3, SP2 RU6 released...
“Curiously, Exchange 2010 SP2 RU6 contains an ActiveSync loop fix
It does NOT.
From: Leedy, Andy [mailto:ale...@butlerschein.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 3:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 SP3, SP2 RU6 released...
“Curiously, Exchange 2010 SP2 RU6 contains an ActiveSync loop fix:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2783771
-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 SP1 EdgeTransport.exe eating up all memory
Does restarting MsExchangeTransport do anything at all?
What do your queues look like?
From: Reimer, Mark [mailto:mark.rei...@prairie.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 3:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Emails over 1GB ? were they sent from outlook 2003 that does not care about
exchange sending limits, or do you have no size limits ?
From: Reimer, Mark [mailto:mark.rei...@prairie.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 1:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 SP1
1 - 100 of 4850 matches
Mail list logo
