: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 2:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Revisit: to RSG or to not RSG
Oh, thanks. Does SCR use/need clustering? Not sure that's something I
want to dwelve into...
_
From: Michael B. Smith [m
Oh, thanks. Does SCR use/need clustering? Not sure that's something
I want to dwelve into...
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 1:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Revisit: to RSG or to no
'cuz clustering requires enterprise.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 2:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Revisit: to RSG or to not RSG
&q
David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 12:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Revisit: to RSG or to not RSG
Heck, I know nothing about licenses!
You do need Windows Enterprise however for CCR.
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, Janu
avid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 12:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Revisit: to RSG or to not RSG
2.5? Long time.
Why would you need to run eseutil against a restored database?
Also note that Outlook clients in cache mode will get a warning ab
_
>
>
> From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 1:12 PM
>
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Revisit: to RSG or to not RSG
>
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Revisit: to RSG or to not RSG
>
>
&g
2007 = ME2
Shook
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 1:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Revisit: to RSG or to not RSG
Drool, I can't wait to get on 2007. If I want to replicate my one
Exc
Hmm, CCR - sounds like an e2k7 option - we'll be looking at migrating to
that at some point in the future.
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 10:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Revisit: to RSG or t
om: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 1:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Revisit: to RSG or to not RSG
Heck, I know nothing about licenses!
You do need Windows Enterprise however for CCR.
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sen
t's a great option, just not one I prefer over simply restoring
from backup.
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 1:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Revisit: to RSG or to not RSG
Even I just have 'a' database
Heck, I know nothing about licenses!
You do need Windows Enterprise however for CCR.
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 1:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Revisit: to RSG or to not RSG
Drool, I can't wait to get on 2007. If I wa
2008 1:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Revisit: to RSG or to not RSG
Even I just have 'a' database. It would take 2.5 hours to restore. I would
rather get people up and running, not rush through a database restore, have
time to do eseutil diag test on it, then merge
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 12:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Revisit: to RSG or to not RSG
Yep.
If a server bites it, then, well, that's why we use CCR!
From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
tabase, my users are not flipping me off.
Plus, I have always thought the dial-tone method was kinda fun ;)
-Sam
From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 12:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Revisit: to RSG or
Dial tone is our DR strategy as long as we are still on Exchange 2003.
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 9:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Revisit: to RSG or to not RSG
Thinking back to this thread... Are people still using Dial
Yep.
If a server bites it, then, well, that's why we use CCR!
From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 1:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Revisit: to RSG or to not RSG
Oh, my bad - you DID say A database -
Oh, my bad - you DID say A database - sorry.
From: Don Andrews
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 10:01 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Revisit: to RSG or to not RSG
Really? - how many clusters/servers/databases/terabytes
Really? - how many clusters/servers/databases/terabytes?
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 8:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Revisit: to RSG or to not RSG
I find the dial-tone restores more work
I find the dial-tone restores more work than they are worth.
I can restore a database and replay logs in less than an hour.
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 11:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Revisit: to RSG or to not RSG
Thinking back to
ze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 11:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Revisit: to RSG or to not RSG
Thinking back to this thread... Are people still using Dial-Tone Restore
Method when recovering Exchange Databases? (Then swap the databases and
merge th
Thinking back to this thread... Are people still using Dial-Tone
Restore Method when recovering Exchange Databases? (Then swap the
databases and merge them).
I never really revisited it since SP2 came out. I know that they
improved the RSG and ExMerge process in SP2
I still practice to Dial
21 matches
Mail list logo
