Title: Message
You are correct.
- Original Message -
From:
Garland
Mac Neill
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 4:45
PM
Subject: RE: Can someone settle
this(part 2)
Ok,
that makes lots of sense
Now the argument
Title: Message
Tell
your colleague he may want to join the list - he might learn something. I know i
did (still am).
-Original Message-From: Missy Koslosky
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 May 2002 15:07To:
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Can someone settle
Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT4 SP6
Outlook XP and Outlook 2000.
My coworker and I are trying to determine how Outlook really
works. We have noticed that when we are dialed up on our laptops and connected
to our network via an IPSEC VPN connection (same with PPTP), when we connect to
Exchange
PROTECTED]
-Original Message-From: Garland Mac
Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002
1:08 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Can someone
settle this
Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT4
SP6
Outlook XP and Outlook
2000.
My coworker and I
Title: Message
Its by
design.
-Original Message-From: Garland Mac
Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002
1:08 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Can someone
settle this
Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT4
SP6
Outlook XP and Outlook
2000
Title: Message
Like my rugged
good looks
-Original Message-From: Andy David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002
10:22 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Can
someone settle this
Its
by design.
-Original Message
May 2002
18:08To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Can someone
settle this
Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT4
SP6
Outlook XP and Outlook
2000.
My coworker and I are trying to
determine how Outlook really works. We have noticed that when we are dialed up
on our laptops
Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002
10:08 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Can someone
settle this
Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT4
SP6
Outlook XP and Outlook
2000.
My coworker and I are trying to
determine how Outlook really works. We have
come up again.
Its a
cheat on MS' side to try and speed up your client.
-Original Message-From: Garland Mac
Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002
12:08 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Can someone
settle this
Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT4
SP6
Title: Message
Still
happee!
-Original Message-From: Andy David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:34
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Can someone
settle this
Actually its called called Outlook 2002, but regardless, you'll see
nce Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday,
May 09, 2002 1:20 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
RE: Can someone settle this
I
think the info box is new to OXP. O2K was just a slow over a dial up, but no
info box to let you know.
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Be
Title: Message
Thanks guys. It just won me lunch
-Original Message-
From: Andy David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Can someone settle
this
Actually its called
called Outlook 2002
Title: Message
What?
It's not a "cheat". It's an informational
message. And RPC's are most certainly not "removed".
- Original Message -
From:
MHR(Michael Ross)
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:17
PM
Subject: RE
Yea, the popup box is just an interface for a highly complex backend that
sifts through bad RPCs ;)
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Can someone settle this
What
someone settle thisYea, the popup box is just an interface
for a highly complex backend thatsifts through bad RPCs
;)-Original Message-From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: Re: Can someone settle
Title: Message
And
this is a cheat?
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:36
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Can someone
settle this
Taken right from the outlook 2002 white paper:Cancelable
IssuesSubject: RE: Can someone
settle this
And
this is a cheat?
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:36
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Can someone
settle this
Taken right
Title: Message
Since MAPI uses RPC, you're kind of correct.
I am unaware of MS;s wish to remove this functionality.
- Original Message -
From:
MHR(Michael Ross)
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:42
PM
Subject: RE: Can someone settle
Title: Message
And it certainly doesn't "remove" RPC's. It
can cancel a call if you click the "cancel" button, but that's it.
- Original Message -
From:
Andy
David
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:40
PM
Subject: RE
not Synch until
you either tell it to or close out, saying you have the switch turned on
Am I wrong?
-Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:36
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Can someone settle
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Can
someone settle this(part 2)
Ok,
that makes lots of sense
Now the argument has
moved to synchriozation. Like when does it occur.
The example being
that you open Outlook, you receive an attachment, you
open attachmentwhere are you
Title: Message
Yeah sure
And beer too.
I'll expense iti'm in Boulder:)
-Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Can someone settle
this(part
]]Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002
13:46To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Can
someone settle this(part 2)
Ok,
that makes lots of sense
Now the argument has
moved to synchriozation. Like when does it occur.
The example being
that you open Outlook, you receive
-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 April 2002 15:24
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: settle this
Are you sure??
--Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: Neil
I get it screwed up too because it was more in beta!
-Original Message-
From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 2:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: settle this
Yes.[1]
[1] Yeah, a bit late, but so?
Les Bessant MCSE[1] mailto:[EMAIL
And couldn't you move servers between admin groups in beta3?!
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 03 May 2002 10:37
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: settle this
Subject: RE: settle this
I get it screwed up too because
Yes. Dang it.
- Original Message -
From: Neil Hobson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 5:38 AM
Subject: RE: settle this
And couldn't you move servers between admin groups in beta3?!
-Original Message-
From: William
It's 4 storage groups, each containing a maximum of 5 databases! Doh!
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 23 April 2002 22:07
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: settle this
Subject: RE: settle this
I knew it was 20. Some how I
Title: Message
You
wrongly assumed that people understood good grammar. J
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 4:07
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: settle this
Sheesh people.
I was simply making
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:05
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: settle
this
You
wrongly assumed that people understood good grammar. J
-Original
Message-From: Matthew
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, April
Admin Issues
Subject: RE: settle this
Hey,
it was late for me.. i was sleepy.. the sun got in my eyes.. I was
hungry,the dog ate my homework, i ran outta gas, there was an earthquake, my
brakes failed, for the love of god.. Please dont kill
me
-Original Message
]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002
9:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: settle this
Hey,
it was late for me.. i was sleepy.. the
sun got in my eyes.. I was hungry,the dog ate my homework, i ran outta
gas, there was an earthquake, my brakes
failed,
for the love of god.. Please
Are you sure??
--Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 12:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: settle
PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 7:08
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: settle
this
Hey,
it
was late for me.. i was sleepy.. the sun got in my eyes.. I was
hungry,the dog ate my homework, i ran outta gas, there was an earthquake, my
brakes
failed
God, now I'm doubting myself. I just checked TechNet, and found
Q251123.
So it looks like I scored an injury time winner :-)
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 24 April 2002 15:24
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: settle
Title: Message
Dang.
Me and
Joe Dirt were gonna go look for his parents next week.
Dang.
-Original Message-From: Kevin Miller
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002
9:27 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: settle
this
I
dont buy it Mr
Title: Message
Complex seems to be
arousing for many techs. Hmmm...that sounded bad didn't it? lol
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002
9:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: settle this
Well, just so
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: settle this
God, now I'm doubting myself. I just checked TechNet, and found
Q251123.
So it looks like I scored an injury time winner :-)
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 24 April 2002 15:24
Posted
Title: Message
I have a dispute
going.
Exchange 5.5 has a
single information store that consists of the priv.edb and the
pub.edb
Exchange 2000 has
the same priv.edb, pub.edb, but can have more than one information
store.
These stores are
mailbox and\or public folder stores which are in
Title: Message
The enterprise
version supports multiple stores and saucer separation.
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 1:21
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: settle
this
I have a dispute
going
here!
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 1:21
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: settle
this
I have a dispute
going.
Exchange 5.5 has a
single information store that consists of the priv.edb
Title: Message
we are
talking enterprise editon
so i
am correct.. right?
-Original Message-From: Kevin Miller
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002
3:26 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: settle
this
2k
In standardyou get 1. in enterprise
Title: Message
you
mean the edb and the stm?
-Original Message-From: Kevin Miller
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 1:26
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: settle
this
2k
In standardyou get 1. in enterprise you can have more then one
23, 2002 1:40 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
settle this
you
mean the edb and the stm?
-Original Message-From: Kevin Miller
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002
1:26 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: settle
Title: Message
How about M:
drives? How many of those do you get?
-Original Message-From: Kevin Miller
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002
1:42 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: settle
this
the
EDB, the STM, and the LOG files. yes
IssuesSubject: RE: settle this
How about M:
drives? How many of those do you get?
-Original Message-From: Kevin Miller
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002
1:42 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: settle
this
the EDB, the STM
Title: Message
Why
wouldn't I want to retain a whole saucer?
-Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, April 23,
2002 1:25 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
settle this
The enterprise
version supports multiple stores
: William
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April
23, 2002 1:54 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
settle this
Why
wouldn't I want to retain a whole saucer?
-Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday
Title: Message
Yes, you are wording it "wrongly"
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 3:26
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: settle this
2k In standardyou
get 1. in enterprise you can have mor
Title: Message
Exactly. The main
drive becomes a powerful weapon, while the saucer can hold the passengers and
your backups.
-Original Message-From: Kevin Miller
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002
1:58 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: settle
IssuesSubject: RE:
settle this
Yes, you are wording
it "wrongly"
-Original
Message-From: Kevin
Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 3:26
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: settle
this
2k In
standar
: settle this
Yes, you are wording it
wrongly
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 3:26
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: settle this
2k In
standardyou get 1. in enterprise you can have more then one Private
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002
2:05 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: settle
this
Yes, WHO is wording
it wrongly. Certainly not Kevin - he is correct on
all accounts. E2K Entp can indeed have multiple databases. IIRC, you can have up to 4 Mailbox
n Issues
Subject: RE: settle this
Yes, WHO is wording it
wrongly. Certainly not Kevin - he is correct on all accounts. E2K
Entp can indeed have multiple databases. IIRC, you can have up to 4
Mailbox Stores (aka databases) per Storage Group, and up to 5 Storage Groups
per Server. This gives you
Message-From: Ben Winzenz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002
5:05 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: settle
this
Yes, WHO is wording
it wrongly. Certainly not Kevin - he is correct on
all accounts. E2K Entp can indeed have multiple databases. IIRC
55 matches
Mail list logo
