Daryl Richards (Fr 22 Jan 2016 19:34:52 CET):
…
> Yes, that seems to have solved the issue.
The patch is already on its way into exim-4_86+fixes
Best regards from Dresden/Germany
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de internet
On 2016-01-22 10:01 AM, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
Daryl Richards (Do 21 Jan 2016 16:55:24 CET):
On 2016-01-19 8:16 AM, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
Hello,
we've some finding about cutthrough routing…
It seems we loose parts of the messages.
[details deleted]
I'm sorry I'm not in a position t
On 2016-01-22 10:01, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
Daryl Richards (Do 21 Jan 2016 16:55:24 CET):
On 2016-01-19 8:16 AM, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
>Hello,
>
>we've some finding about cutthrough routing…
>It seems we loose parts of the messages.
>
>[details deleted]
I'm sorry I'm not in a position
Daryl Richards (Do 21 Jan 2016 16:55:24 CET):
> On 2016-01-19 8:16 AM, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >we've some finding about cutthrough routing…
> >It seems we loose parts of the messages.
> >
> >[details deleted]
> I'm sorry I'm not in a position to break it down as well as this, b
On 21/01/16 15:55, Daryl Richards wrote:
> On 2016-01-19 8:16 AM, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> In my case, the cutthrough delivery is going to an Exchange server, and
> I don't see the SSL errors, it's just that attachments seem to be not
> delivered through. I've been trying to figure out why and
On 2016-01-19 8:16 AM, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
Hello,
we've some finding about cutthrough routing…
It seems we loose parts of the messages.
[details deleted]
I'm sorry I'm not in a position to break it down as well as this, but I
thought a 'me too' might be helpful to indicate it's not isol
Hello,
we've some finding about cutthrough routing…
It seems we loose parts of the messages.
Our setup:
{ internet } --> host HH --> cutthrough --> host MX
exim 4.86_8-c4dcf90 (4.86+fixes) on HH
Sometimes the delivery size on host HH from the log
is *bigger* then the delivery size on host
