On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 07:10:03PM -0500, Herb Martin said:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Scott Call [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > What is the thinking on "helo_allow_chars = _" -- other
> > than "I want
> > > to receive their email" is there a reason to accept or reject such?
> >
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Why should everyone reimplement a queue instead of just one program
> implementing a queue on the machine? If the user wants to flush the
> queue, why should he have to track the many different queues instead
> of having just one to look at?
As I said, and what do t
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Call [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > What is the thinking on "helo_allow_chars = _" -- other
> than "I want
> > to receive their email" is there a reason to accept or reject such?
>
> It's purpose is to allow certain exceptions (like _) to the
> RFC all
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Herb Martin wrote:
What is the thinking on "helo_allow_chars = _" --
other than "I want to receive their email" is there
a reason to accept or reject such?
It's purpose is to allow certain exceptions (like _) to the RFC allowed
helo characters.
This was you can allow _
> -Original Message-
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Sherman
>
> Herb Martin wrote:
> > Is there a particular Exim setting that tells Exim to perform the
> > check that causes the following
> > error:
> >
> > (I wrapped it to avoid likely email wrapping problems):
> >
> >
Herb Martin wrote:
Is there a particular Exim setting that tells
Exim to perform the check that causes the following
error:
(I wrapped it to avoid likely email wrapping problems):
2005-09-27 16:27:31 rejected EHLO from
mail2.westlakechemical.com [204.126.135.64]:
syntactically inval
Is there a particular Exim setting that tells
Exim to perform the check that causes the following
error:
(I wrapped it to avoid likely email wrapping problems):
2005-09-27 16:27:31 rejected EHLO from
mail2.westlakechemical.com [204.126.135.64]:
syntactically invalid argument(s):
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 03:42:38PM -0400, Marc Sherman said:
> OpenMacNews wrote:
> >"Clamd does not seem to unpack MIME containers, so it is recommended
> >to unpack MIME
> >attachments in the MIME ACL"
>
> Like the demime option, that statement about clamav is obsolete. Clamav
> does
What is the purpose of ident anymore? With the vast majority of mail servers
not supporting ident (this is anecdotal based on my logs). It does not help
with spam and only seems to slow the server down.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
> Like the demime option, that statement about clamav is
> obsolete. Clamav does a pretty good job at unpacking mime
> containers these days.
>
> - Marc
I agree about ClamAv -- we don't check with ClamAV until
"DATA"-time and then just the entire message.
What about checking (easily) for malf
Hello Marc,
Marc Sherman, 27.09.2005 (d.m.y):
> rich lott wrote:
> >
> >---8<---
> >2005-09-27 20:31:07 cwd=/home/rich 4 args: send-mail -i -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >2005-09-27 20:31:07 1EKLAR-0002Rr-De <= [EMAIL PROTECTED] U=root P=local
> >
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 05:50:55PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> On Saturday 24 September 2005 21:45, Steve Lamb wrote:
>>> Quite frankly desktop machines shouldn't have SMTP servers on them
>>> at all.
> I'd be interested in any definition of a desktop where an SMTP
> server would be a require
I would look at ident causing problems. The default ident (from memory) is
30 seconds. You can turn ident off with the following:
rfc1413_query_timeout=0s
Tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of rich lott
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 4:1
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 20:48, Marc Sherman wrote:
> My guess is that the 30 second delay is the timeout while your DNS
> server fails to resolve the domain xx.
Thanks, but not that, I don't think (dns lookup in <1s - see below).
(Sorry for removing domain name, it seemed irreleva
On Sep 27, 2005, at 12:32 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Mark Edwards wrote:
accept regex = (To|Cc):.*nospam-.*(\n|\r)
The argument to the regex condition is a colon-separated list of
regular
expressions.
It would be much better to set a $acl_m* flag in your RCPT ACL if
On 27/09/05, Marc Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (2) to invoke my spam scanner, Exiscan/ClamAV
> > deny message= VIRUS FOUND : ($malware_name)
> >malware= *
> >demime = *
> >
> > questions:
> >
> > (ii) per the spec,
> >
> > "Clamd does not seem to unpack
rich lott wrote:
---8<---
2005-09-27 20:31:07 cwd=/home/rich 4 args: send-mail -i -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2005-09-27 20:31:07 1EKLAR-0002Rr-De <= [EMAIL PROTECTED] U=root P=local S=285 from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2005-09-27
Hi
I've just installed exim4 (light) and am having some probs. with long delays.
When I send a message it takes around 30 seconds to make it through the queue.
Here's logs (replaced my email domain with xxx to hinder harvesting):
---8<--
OpenMacNews wrote:
(1) to check/deny on 'seriou mime errors'
deny message= Serious MIME defect detected ($demime_reason)
demime = *
condition = ${if >{$demime_errorlevel}{2}{1}{0}}
(i) how should (1) be done if NOT with 'demime'?
http://www.exim.org/mail-archives/exim
hi all,
i'm working on removing 'obsoleted' checks from my exim.conf, as conventional
wisdom would seem to be -- don't use obsoleted features.
at issue is the use of 'demime', which, per the spec has been obsoleted ...
ok. that said, i currently use 'demime' twice in my exim.conf:
(1) to chec
Hi,
In a server runnig exim+mailscanner i need to install dspam. In my current
schema, there is an exim instance listening for smtp connections and
queueing (queue_only option), a mailscanner catching and analysing the
messages on the incoming queue and putting them on another exim queue to be
Christopher L. Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> cobalt:/etc/exim# exim -d2 -bt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
-bv instead of -bt or even better running a real test with -bd -d
(on a different port -X 666 if you cannot take down the main daemon)
might yield better results.
cu and
I'd like to have multiple log files without having to run multiple
instances of Exim.
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Marc Perkel wrote:
> From: Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: exim-users@exim.org
> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 08:52:06 -0700
> Subject: [exim] Multiple Log Files
>
> Is there any way to have multiple log files? I'd like to have a
> separate like file for each interface addres
--On 27 September 2005 08:52:06 -0700 Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there any way to have multiple log files? I'd like to have a separate
like file for each interface address.
--
Marc Perkel - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Spam Filter: http://www.junkemailfilter.com
My Blog: http://marc.
On 27 Sep 2005 at 8:52, Marc Perkel wrote about
"[exim] Multiple Log Files":
| Is there any way to have multiple log files? I'd like to have a separate
| like file for each interface address.
RTFM log_file_path.
You'd need to run separate exim daemons listening to each interface
for the ef
Is there any way to have multiple log files? I'd like to have a separate
like file for each interface address.
--
Marc Perkel - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Spam Filter: http://www.junkemailfilter.com
My Blog: http://marc.perkel.com
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-user
Philip Hazel wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Heiko Schlichting wrote:
Oops. Thanks. Looks like there may be 4.54 sooner than I thought, as
this is not the only glitch I've been sent. But hey, it's a while since
I put out two releases in one week... :-)
Compiled fresh daily. ;)
--
Marc Pe
---
>From FAQ
Q0625: I wish to have large emails go out one at a time.
A0625: One possibility is to set up a router that defers all large messages,
except in queue runs. Since queue runners deliver just one message at a time,
if you limited the number of simultaneous queue
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Christopher L. Everett wrote:
> My Exim 3 config is pretty hacked up.
>
> Got any documentation on doing the upgrade?
As well as the upgrade script already mentioned, there is a file called
Exim4.Upgrade in the doc directory. Please note, however, that as Exim 4
was released
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Christopher L. Everett wrote:
>
> Got any documentation on doing the upgrade?
Have you tried the convert4r4 program?
Tony.
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{(
Tony Finch wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Christopher L. Everett wrote:
I've tried a a custom director:
I'm afraid that Exim 3 is no longer supported. Your problem is easy to
solve with Exim 4.
Well, the last time I tangled with exim it took me *days* to get
everything right. The pr
Tony Finch wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Christopher L. Everett wrote:
I've tried a a custom director:
I'm afraid that Exim 3 is no longer supported. Your problem is easy to
solve with Exim 4.
Sigh. This is going to be such a bear to upgrade for one piece of function.
My Exim 3 co
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 11:50:06 +0200, Mark wrote:
> I know this is a simple question, but there is something fundamental
> that I am just not getting by reading the docs regarding regex in
> exim. I put the following in my data ACL:
>
> acl_check_content:
>
>accept regex = (To|Cc):.*nospam
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Mark Edwards wrote:
>
> accept regex = (To|Cc):.*nospam-.*(\n|\r)
The argument to the regex condition is a colon-separated list of regular
expressions.
It would be much better to set a $acl_m* flag in your RCPT ACL if one of
the addresses matches nospam-*, then test the fla
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Christopher L. Everett wrote:
>
> I've tried a a custom director:
I'm afraid that Exim 3 is no longer supported. Your problem is easy to
solve with Exim 4.
Tony.
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\
We answered this question two weeks ago. Why are people on this list
re-posting questions so much?
Tony.
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$
I know this is a simple question, but there is something fundamental
that I am just not getting by reading the docs regarding regex in
exim. I put the following in my data ACL:
acl_check_content:
accept regex = (To|Cc):.*nospam-.*(\n|\r)
which is intended to match addresses with a nospam
Hello,
I have a script that sends email notifications to users, and I do
bounce processing on the returns.
Each email I send has a unique local part in the Sender, along the
line of "bounce-id-12345-p".
I used to handle the bounces as they came in directly on the server,
but now I have to move
On 27/09/05, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 05:58 +0100, Peter Bowyer wrote:
No, I didn't - please sort out your quoting.
Thanks
--
Peter Bowyer
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: +44 1296 768003
VoIP: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 05:58 +0100, Peter Bowyer wrote:
> On 26/09/05, Exim newbie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have 3 mail server one pop3 and two smtp. My smtp servers place all the
> > email in the que in /var/spool/exim/input but my pop3 server places the
> > email in individual folders for
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Heiko Schlichting wrote:
> thanks for the release of 4.53. Although I installed the RC1 on more than
> 30 production systems, I didn't notice a typo in src/pcre/Makefile which
> causes problems during installation of the final release on some of my more
> exotic systems.
>
>
42 matches
Mail list logo
