Re: [exim] Eximstats 1.44 is now available

2005-10-14 Thread Marcin Owsiany
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 04:42:39PM +0100, Philip Hazel wrote: > On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Steve Campbell wrote: > > > The parsing for rejection lines is a bit of a mess, and fairly > > unmaintainable. Do you think it would be possible to standardise > > rejection/refusal log messages? How about somethi

[exim] auth_relay_hosts in Exim 4.xx?

2005-10-14 Thread Robert Cates
Hi, I had 'auth_relay_host = *' defined in my Exim 4.43 and 4.54 config, without any error, but it seems to be no longer used in 4.xx. What, if anything, replaced 'auth_relay_hosts' in 4.xx? Thanks, Robert -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details

Re: [exim] Eximstats 1.44 is now available

2005-10-14 Thread Philip Hazel
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Steve Campbell wrote: > The parsing for rejection lines is a bit of a mess, and fairly > unmaintainable. Do you think it would be possible to standardise > rejection/refusal log messages? How about something like: > > (|16 Spaces) *< (Connection|MAIL|RCPT|HELO|EHLO|DATA) reje

Re: [exim] Novell Directory Service query for recipient verification

2005-10-14 Thread exim-users
Christian Schmidt schrieb: Hello exim-users, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 14.10.2005 (d.m.y): What really turned out problematic is verifying alias or distribution list addresses like postmaster@, group@ and the like, as groupwise doesn't seem to make them available via ldap :( I would try using a

Re: [exim] Novell Directory Service query for recipient verification

2005-10-14 Thread Christian Schmidt
Hello exim-users, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 14.10.2005 (d.m.y): > What really turned out problematic is verifying alias or distribution > list addresses like postmaster@, group@ and the like, as groupwise > doesn't seem to make them available via ldap :( I would try using an extra aliases _file_ for

[exim] Eximstats 1.44 is now available

2005-10-14 Thread Steve Campbell
Eximstats 1.44 is now available. This version incorporates statistics gathering for sa-exim (SpamAssassin) log messages and for rejection logs. You can obtain it from: http://www.computurn.com/exim/ I think the rejection parsing is fairly comprehensive, but would appreciate it if the community

Re: [exim] Load Based Grey Listing

2005-10-14 Thread Marc Perkel
Christian Schmidt wrote: Hallo Steve, Steve Lamb, 13.10.2005 (d.m.y): Christian Schmidt wrote: Erm... IMO there are slight but important differences between "blocking" and "filtering". Is there? What if he is doing SMTP time blocking after running it through a

Re: [exim] Novell Directory Service query for recipient verification

2005-10-14 Thread exim-users
Alan Thew schrieb: On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:21 , Christian Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Hello exim-users, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 05.10.2005 (d.m.y): does anybody have a snippet similar to http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/MsExchangeAddressVerification for verifying recipient addresses against

Re: [exim] Load Based Grey Listing

2005-10-14 Thread Christian Schmidt
Hallo Steve, Steve Lamb, 13.10.2005 (d.m.y): > Christian Schmidt wrote: > > Erm... > > > IMO there are slight but important differences between "blocking" and > > "filtering". > > Is there? What if he is doing SMTP time blocking after running it > through a filter? What I wanted to put t

Re: [exim] Load Based Grey Listing

2005-10-14 Thread Steve C. Lamb
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 03:57:51PM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote: > I guess it's how you use the terminology. Some messages I tag as spam > and pass. Some messages I bounce. Some I blackhole. Some I reject at > connect time. Strictly speaking aren't all of these actions taken because of filters?