On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Risse Laurent wrote:
I already ran exim using its debug mode and saw what I expected, all
things are working well through the debug informations...
If it works when debugging is turned on and does not work when debugging
is turned off, that is very strange indeed.
--
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006, Renaud Allard wrote:
I can do any tests you wish, but if you could tell me what would be
useful to you, it would be better.
I have been checking the Exim test suite, and it already contains a test
for callouts that fail at RCPT, and (needless to say) the message that
is
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006, Craig Whitmore wrote:
Is is safe to have a shared /var/spool/exim4/db (say have it on NFS) so I can
share the callout and ratelimit db's etc on multiple machines
Not really - you're relying on NFS locking, which is only safe if you are
careful.
Note that this may hurt
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 01:34 -0300, alexis wrote:
This is the scenario.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is an alias for [EMAIL PROTECTED], now, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
has
it's autorespond configured, so if i send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ill
receive an autoresponse from robert, how can i avoid that?
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 01:34:17AM -0300, alexis wrote:
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 01:34:17 -0300
From: alexis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: exim-users@exim.org
Subject: [exim] alias and autorespond
This is the scenario.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is an alias for [EMAIL PROTECTED], now, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Daniel Parry wrote:
Now syslog (default BSD version), in its infinite wisdom sees the
identical messages and decides that they should both be reported
at the priority level of the first... thus the alert slips through
at level info! Now this is no fault of exim, but it
1 and 2 Not possible, in my scenario robert doesnt know about the 'jack' alias.
3. the behavior that my customer wants (i found this stupid too, but
you know, customer is always right) is
- if somebody sends an email to robert, to keep the message at the
robert mailbox and also send the
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Renaud Allard wrote:
Here is the result of the test. The callout was cached, so I suppressed
the cache before sending the message. I also removed greylisting because
it would have been unpractical for debugging.
I included the full file just in case.
Thanks for the
Philip Hazel wrote:
Notice what happens: the first test is correctly rejected at the RCPT TO
stage. Exim then sends RSET and MAIL FROM: again. This time, the
remote host gives the response that Exim logs! So as far as I can
see, the remote host is behaving weirdly. (And the remote host is
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 11:38 -0300, alexis wrote:
3. the behavior that my customer wants (i found this stupid too, but
you know, customer is always right) is
- if somebody sends an email to robert, to keep the message at the
robert mailbox and also send the autoreply (this is working just
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
I've written notes on good autoreply habits in the past - in the
archives somewhere - for example...
http://www.exim.org/pipermail/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20011210/033121.html
See also ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3834.txt
Tony.
--
Indeed, it is definitely not an exim bug. I examined the logs to find
other servers where I get this kind of behaviour, and they all appear to
run alligate mail server.
On 2/13/2006, Philip Hazel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Renaud Allard wrote:
Here is the result of the test.
Colleagues,
In mailertable (sendmail) I can write
.old-company.com = smtp:%1.new-company.com
In the CGP routing table I can write:
*.old-company.com = *.new-company.com
How do I achieve the same RHS expansion in an exim router (in route_data)?
The simplest way would be to enumerate all the
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, I wrote:
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005, Stanislaw Halik wrote:
a while ago I made a patch, causing Exim to set resource limits (via a
login_cap(3) library functions) when running a pipe transport.
I'd be very grateful for any comments about the patch.
I will take a look in
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Tony Finch wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
I've written notes on good autoreply habits in the past - in the
archives somewhere - for example...
http://www.exim.org/pipermail/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20011210/033121.html
See also
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 11:38:18AM -0300, alexis wrote:
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:38:18 -0300
From: alexis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exim Mailing List exim-users@exim.org
Subject: Re: [exim] alias and autorespond
1 and 2 Not possible, in my scenario robert doesnt know about the 'jack'
alias.
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Philip Hazel wrote:
Another problem is that the functions you have used (login_cap,
login_getpwclass, setclassresources) all appear to be BSD-specific. They
don't exist in Linux or Solaris. They exist in FreeBSD - I don't know if
they exist in OpenBSD or NetBSD.
It
On 2/13/06, Steven Wayne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 11:38:18AM -0300, alexis wrote:
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:38:18 -0300
From: alexis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exim Mailing List exim-users@exim.org
Subject: Re: [exim] alias and autorespond
1 and 2 Not possible, in
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, alexis wrote:
1 and 2 Not possible, in my scenario robert doesnt know about the 'jack'
alias.
If the aliasing is happening inside Exim, using redirection, then
robert's filter or whatever (some router) can detect whether the message
is direct or via an alias by
On 2/13/06, Philip Hazel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, alexis wrote:
1 and 2 Not possible, in my scenario robert doesnt know about the
'jack' alias.
If the aliasing is happening inside Exim, using redirection, then
Yes it is
mysql_alias:
driver = redirect
On 13 Feb 2006 at 9:02, Fred Viles wrote about
Re: [exim] Strange Sender Verificat:
|... (nothing relevant)
Sorry, I hadn't read the later messages yet (doh).
- Fred
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
##
I'm testing exim4 in Debian when i send a mail to local user I get a error
in mainlog : Unrouteable address
2006-02-13 09:50:57 1F8fy0-hh-25 = [EMAIL PROTECTED] U=root
P=local S=406
2006-02-13 09:51:07 1F8fy0-hh-25 ** [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Unrouteable
address
2006-02-13 09:51:17
Hello Exim Users,
I've installed Exim from the Debian package and I'm having some problems
with it's configuration.
My idea is to set up an Exim server with MySQL. It would have 2 tables,
one for domains and other one for aliases. The only function of this
server would be get the email,
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 11:28:14 +0100 (CET), Jakob Hirsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Brent Clark wrote:
I was wondering if I shouldnt add something like
require_files = $local_part:$home/.forward
I have added this to the default configuration for Debian exim4.
Greetings
Marc
--
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 10:02:41 +0100 (CET), Jakob Hirsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Rafa wrote:
control. My problem is, that server is configured to return 450 for
invalid mailboxes, causing exim to interpret it as a temporary error.
This is broken, wrong and stupid.
4xx tells other MTAs to retry,
Philip Hazel wrote:
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Marc Sherman wrote:
Here's a repost with excerpts from today's exim_mainlog file, un-edited:
This entry is logged over 30,000 times per day in the exim_mainlog:
2005-12-28 09:36:50 no IP address found for host
smtp05.dc2.safesecureweb.com (during SMTP
On Feb 13, 2006, at 1:28 PM, Alvaro Marín wrote:
[...snip...]
In router section, I have this:
mysql_aliases:
driver = redirect
allow_fail
allow_defer
data = ${lookup mysql{ SELECT dest FROM aliases \
WHERE email='[EMAIL PROTECTED]'}}
And the aliases table is:
27 matches
Mail list logo
