Hello Sir,
First of all heartly thanks for replying me. While studying
code of local_scan function I understood that we read the values in to input
buffer and send it to dccifd. Dccifd returns the result of scaaning in form
A or R or S, accepted rejected receipent list and finally
I'm running exim-4.63-5.fc6 and spamassassin 3.1.8,
I get a lot of bounced incoming mail, typical msg is:
421 Lost incoming connection
The SMTP transaction started in line 0.
The error was detected in line 3.
0 previous messages were successfully processed.
The rest of the batch was
Thomas Hochstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debbie D schrieb:
Graeme, I added the condition you suggested below and sent a test fax and
it
was again rejected:
You did reload the config after changing it?
I did the change inside cPanels exim configutator
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
What do you think about having certain predefined macros available? One such
macro could be CONFDIR, and I can also imagine macros that are defined
according to which features are compiled in.
The point of these macros would be enabling the writing
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Andreas Haschka wrote:
Now what I want is:
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - mailbox1, mailbox2
...without redirecting to the addresses [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (I also have a vacation router in my setup, and doing
it this way, would possibly expose that for one of
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Tony Finch wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
What do you think about having certain predefined macros available? One such
macro could be CONFDIR, and I can also imagine macros that are defined
according to which features are compiled in.
The point
On Wed May 02 2007 at 10:28:50 CEST, Philip Hazel wrote:
If you have a pile of macros defined, Exim is going to scan each config
line for those macros every time it reads the config, which is something
that it does often.
Surely Exim has to do that anyway, to determine whether a macro is
Hello Friends,
I am a new bee to exim and need some help from the experts. Following is my
Exim conf, I want to add RBL checks at SMTP Level. Please let me know what
lines should be added where?
Thanks in Advance.
##
#
I was asked some time ago to set up special logging for certain
deliveries. The e-mails are generated by a web application, and the
developers wanted to correlate their application logs with logs of
e-mails actually leaving the building, as it were.
The e-mails in question have a recognisable
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 11:36, exim.list exim.list wrote:
I am a new bee to exim and need some help from the experts. Following is my
Exim conf, I want to add RBL checks at SMTP Level. Please let me know what
lines should be added where?
Please read the specification, sections 40.22ff
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
If you have a pile of macros defined, Exim is going to scan each config
line for those macros every time it reads the config, which is something
that it does often.
Surely Exim has to do that anyway, to determine whether a macro is used?
I
On Wed May 02 2007 at 12:39:10 CEST, Philip Hazel wrote:
Suppose you define 100 macros. Then for each input line that Exim reads,
Therefore, the larger i, the more work is done. For each line, remember.
Yes, that is obvious.
I misunderstood in as much as I thought by
If you have a pile of
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
I misunderstood in as much as I thought by
If you have a pile of macros defined, Exim is going to scan each config
line for those macros every time it reads the config, which is something
you meant Exim would have to scan, as opposed to not
To authenticate users before they can send mail from my server, I have been
using SPA which has been working fine up to now.
One user has just switched to Vista and it has all stopped working -
authentication fails every time.
I guess Vista is encrypting the username/password differently to the
smart_route:
driver = manualroute
domains = !+local_domains
transport = remote_smtp
route_list = * ${lookup mysql{SELECT target FROM exim_smarthost
WHERE (domain='$domain')}}
According to the documentation the destination of a route list can
include a server and port.
I've tried
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Mike Brudenell wrote:
Is there a different return code that deliver can exit with to
indicate this to Exim?
Exim uses the sendmail LDA interface which sadly does not support this.
I'd suggest using LMTP if you can, but I dee that Dovecot doesn't do LMTP.
How much do you
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 12:39, Philip Hazel wrote:
Suppose you define 100 macros. Then for each input line that Exim reads,
it obeys
for (i = 0; i 100; i++)
Search the line for occurrences of macro number i
That looks inefficient, but perhaps necessary due to the partly silly way
Hope not to sound to ignorant but what is a macro? Can you give an
example of what that would look like?
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
Chris Lear wrote:
The filter file looks like this:
#Exim filter
if $h_x_application_flash:is not then
logfile /var/log/exim/special_log/log 640
logwrite $message_headers
endif
This writes the message headers into the special log file, then the
message is delivered as
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 06:31:59AM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
Hope not to sound to ignorant but what is a macro? Can you give an
example of what that would look like?
Pretty much like they do in the spec.
--
Dave Evans 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
Power
am 02.05.2007 15:31 schrieb Marc Perkel:
Hope not to sound to ignorant but what is a macro? Can you give an
example of what that would look like?
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-4.67/doc/html/spec_html/ch06.html#SECTmacrodefs
--
## List details at
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 15:31, Marc Perkel wrote:
Hope not to sound to ignorant but what is a macro? Can you give an
example of what that would look like?
Marc, RTFM. Chapter six.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 15:31, Marc Perkel wrote:
Hope not to sound to ignorant but what is a macro? Can you give an
example of what that would look like?
Marc, RTFM. Chapter six.
That's what I thought it was. What confuses me is what's a Predefined
I tried to add it but all mails started rejecting. Can some one pls help me
out with this.
On 5/2/07, Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 11:36, exim.list exim.list wrote:
I am a new bee to exim and need some help from the experts. Following is
my
Exim conf, I
exim.list exim.list wrote:
I tried to add it but all mails started rejecting. Can some one pls help me
out with this.
Not unless you give us more information. At the very least, we'll need
the configs you're using, and logs showing the problems you're having --
both unobfuscated.
- Marc
--
On Wed, May 02, 2007, Marc Perkel wrote:
Hope not to sound to ignorant but what is a macro? Can you give an
example of what that would look like?
Marc, RTFM. Chapter six.
I think I see what the controversy is. Because a macro can be any string
then you have to scan every line for every
Following is my ACL Conf. Let me know where should I add the rbl check.
##
# ACL CONFIGURATION#
# Specifies access control lists for incoming SMTP mail #
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Stanislaw Halik wrote:
Also, why aren't these macros expanded once at load time and stored in
memory expanded?
AFAIK, the config file is being re-parsed upon spawning a new Exim
instance.
Exactly. So in that sense they *are* expanded once at load time. The
only
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
I don't think there would be any practical differences except in rather
complex configurations. Still, probably something for Exim 5.
Yes. The current arrangement was intended as a *simple* macro feature.
--
Philip HazelUniversity of
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Customer Support wrote:
smart_route:
driver = manualroute
domains = !+local_domains
transport = remote_smtp
route_list = * ${lookup mysql{SELECT target FROM exim_smarthost
WHERE (domain='$domain')}}
According to the documentation the destination of a route
Hello, hope someone can help with this hypothetical (at the moment)
situation ...
- spammer sends email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- domainA fails to detect that it is spam
- userA has set up forwarding to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- domainA attempts to forward email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- domainB detects that
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 16:05, Marc Perkel wrote:
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 15:31, Marc Perkel wrote:
Hope not to sound to ignorant but what is a macro? Can you give an
example of what that would look like?
Marc, RTFM. Chapter six.
That's what I thought it was.
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 17:14, Philip Hazel wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
I don't think there would be any practical differences except in rather
complex configurations. Still, probably something for Exim 5.
Yes. The current arrangement was intended as a *simple* macro
Richard.Hall wrote:
Hello, hope someone can help with this hypothetical (at the moment)
situation ...
- spammer sends email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- domainA fails to detect that it is spam
- userA has set up forwarding to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- domainA attempts to forward email to [EMAIL
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
Simple specification or simple implementation? ;)
Both. I'm a simple sort of person. :-)
--
Philip HazelUniversity of Cambridge Computing Service
Get the Exim 4 book:http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book
--
## List details at
Philip Hazel wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
I don't think there would be any practical differences except in rather
complex configurations. Still, probably something for Exim 5.
Yes. The current arrangement was intended as a *simple* macro feature.
Fair 'nuf.
Now ..
On May 2, 2007, at 5:21 PM, Richard.Hall wrote:
Hello, hope someone can help with this hypothetical (at the moment)
situation ...
snip
Is there any way for domainA to prevent the generation, or at least
the
transmission, of the NDR? (Other than improving its spam detection
rates!!)
I
On Wed, 2 May 2007, W B Hacker wrote:
But one might then ask, how MACRO's compare in potential load with:
- hostlists
- lookups (in general)
- lookups involving SQL calls
Indeed. But all of those items can be omitted from the config if you
don't want them. Predefined macros would not
Hey folks.
We are running Exim 4.52 and I'm trying to setup a system filter that
will match the following flow...
if
$local_part ends -l
and
subject is User Quarantine Account Information
or
subject is Spam Quarantine Summary
then
Have you got debugging information to show that this does not work?
Which release of Exim? Support for ports in manual route was added
at
release 4.53.
Ah, thank you very much for that, it's the version I'm testing against
that wasn't up to date, it works fine on the live system.
Regards
Philip Hazel wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2007, W B Hacker wrote:
But one might then ask, how MACRO's compare in potential load with:
- hostlists
- lookups (in general)
- lookups involving SQL calls
Indeed. But all of those items can be omitted from the config if you
don't want them.
On 02/05/07, exim.list exim.list [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried to add it but all mails started rejecting. Can some one pls help me
out with this.
Not without much more information. If you're doing this on a live
system: stop. On a test system, or with a test config, make your
changes, do
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 16:21 +0100, Richard.Hall wrote:
Hello, hope someone can help with this hypothetical (at the moment)
situation ...
- spammer sends email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- domainA fails to detect that it is spam
- userA has set up forwarding to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- domainA
Hello,
I've been running exim4 for more sometime now and I have to say I'm very
happy with on the whole. Having said that I'm interested in turning down the
level of detail to which it's logging but I can't find the option (e.g:
log_level) under Debian in a split configuration and I would welcome
submit wrote:
Hello,
I've been running exim4 for more sometime now and I have to say I'm very
happy with on the whole. Having said that I'm interested in turning down the
level of detail to which it's logging but I can't find the option (e.g:
log_level) under Debian in a split configuration
Marc Sherman wrote:
submit wrote:
Hello,
I've been running exim4 for more sometime now and I have to say I'm very
happy with on the whole. Having said that I'm interested in turning down the
level of detail to which it's logging but I can't find the option (e.g:
log_level) under Debian in a
Marc,
That's great, thanks for that...
hugh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marc Sherman
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 9:02 PM
To: Marc Sherman
Cc: exim-users@exim.org
Subject: Re: [exim] exim4 logging
Marc Sherman wrote:
submit
Richard.Hall wrote:
Hello, hope someone can help with this hypothetical (at the moment)
situation ...
- spammer sends email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- domainA fails to detect that it is spam
- userA has set up forwarding to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- domainA attempts to forward email to [EMAIL
I'm not sure what I did, but I broke my exim install. It was working
fine, till suddenly it wasn't. I was having a problem where it
couldn't setuid and gid, but that was because the binary lost it's
setuid bit, again, I have no idea how/why.
My current problem is when mail is received, it is not
Actually, I'm mistaken.. Relay messages are behaving the same way.
On 5/2/07, Andrew Radamis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure what I did, but I broke my exim install. It was working
fine, till suddenly it wasn't. I was having a problem where it
couldn't setuid and gid, but that was
I am a simple user (you can read that both ways)
In my mind there are two points here:
1) To include (or not to include) predefined macros
2) The overheads of processing additional macros
I am assuming that these predefined macros relate to the exim
environment itself and can be set at
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 16:29 +0100, Philip Hazel wrote:
Then it struck me that there is no need to mess with signals. A simple
call to select() can also detect this situation. I have therefore
implemented code to do this (with some extra features for the input
sent too soon case, because of
Hi,
I am receiving a bunch of stock spams (mostly in german). Their common
property seems to be a helo like [ip.add.re.ss].
I am thinking about an ACL like this one:
warn
condition = ${if
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 00:46 +0200, Renaud Allard wrote:
I am receiving a bunch of stock spams (mostly in german). Their common
property seems to be a helo like [ip.add.re.ss].
I am thinking about an ACL like this one:
warn
condition = ${if
It looks like the web server at exim.org is down. Anyone have any ideas
(of course, this mail might be effected too :-) )?
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
It's back now.
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: exim-users@exim.org
cc: (bcc: Dan Mitton/YD/RWDOE)
Subject:[exim] Exim.org web server down?!?
LSN: Not Relevant
User Filed as: Not a Record
It looks like the web server at exim.org is down. Anyone have any ideas
(of
On 4/27/07 7:21 PM, Wayne Pascoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having problems with my sender's addresses being rewritten and I can't
work out why or how to fix it.
I have Exim setup on a server that hosts mail for about 5 domains. I've just
migrated this from Fedora Core 4 to
Renaud Allard wrote:
Hi,
I am receiving a bunch of stock spams (mostly in german). Their common
property seems to be a helo like [ip.add.re.ss].
I am thinking about an ACL like this one:
warn
condition = ${if
Renaud Allard wrote:
I am receiving a bunch of stock spams (mostly in german). Their common
property seems to be a helo like [ip.add.re.ss].
I am thinking about an ACL like this one:
warn
condition = ${if
Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 00:46 +0200, Renaud Allard wrote:
I am receiving a bunch of stock spams (mostly in german). Their common
property seems to be a helo like [ip.add.re.ss].
I am thinking about an ACL like this one:
warn
condition = ${if
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 10:29 +1000, Ted Cooper wrote:
Exim has a function to figure out if something is an IP address without
all the regex
# Deny RAW IP addresses - they MUST be quoted to comply with standards
denymessage = ERRMSG_RAWIP1
condition =
On 5/2/07 4:59 AM, keith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To authenticate users before they can send mail from my server, I have been
using SPA which has been working fine up to now.
One user has just switched to Vista and it has all stopped working -
authentication fails every time.
I guess
Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 10:29 +1000, Ted Cooper wrote:
Exim has a function to figure out if something is an IP address without
all the regex
# Deny RAW IP addresses - they MUST be quoted to comply with standards
denymessage = ERRMSG_RAWIP1
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 17:02 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
On Sunday 22 April 2007 22:23, Jeremy Harris wrote:
The docs link on exim.org still gives a 4.66 doc?
I've updated the webpages now. If I missed anything, please speak out.
PLEASE make the URL to the Exim documentation stable. every
Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
The docs link on exim.org still gives a 4.66 doc?
I've updated the webpages now. If I missed anything, please speak out.
PLEASE make the URL to the Exim documentation stable. every time a new
version comes out, the Google page rank is reset. in addition, nobody
On 03/05/07, Kjetil Torgrim Homme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 17:02 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
On Sunday 22 April 2007 22:23, Jeremy Harris wrote:
The docs link on exim.org still gives a 4.66 doc?
I've updated the webpages now. If I missed anything, please speak
66 matches
Mail list logo
