Re: [exim] Re (2): Syntactic validity of configuration.

2023-04-11 Thread Slavko via Exim-users
Dňa 11. apríla 2023 20:34:58 UTC používateľ Ian Z via Exim-users napísal: >Some other daemons do it, eg. rbldnsd. rbldnsd doesn't autoreload its configuration, but configured data (zones). regards -- Slavko https://www.slavino.sk/ -- ## List details at

Re: [exim] Configuring exim to use an non-TLS connection to port 587.

2023-04-11 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
On 11/04/2023 23:50, Peter via Exim-users wrote: From:    Graeme Fowler via Exim-users Date:    Tue, 11 Apr 2023 18:44:22 +0100 From https://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-encrypted_smtp_connections_using_tlsssl.html (sec 10): "... setting hosts_avoid_tls (an option of

Re: [exim] Configuring exim to use an non-TLS connection to port 587.

2023-04-11 Thread Peter via Exim-users
From: Graeme Fowler via Exim-users Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 18:44:22 +0100 From https://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-encrypted_smtp_connections_using_tlsssl.html (sec 10): "... setting hosts_avoid_tls (an option of the transport) to a list of server hosts for which

[exim] Re (2): Configuring exim to use an non-TLS connection to port 587.

2023-04-11 Thread Peter via Exim-users
From: Jeremy Harris via Exim-users Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 18:56:10 +0100 20:33:41 1656 158.69.159.172 in hosts_require_auth? no (option unset) - which seems bogus given your provider's need for login/password authentication The Debian configurator asked for a domain name or IP

Re: [exim] Re (2): Syntactic validity of configuration.

2023-04-11 Thread Ian Z via Exim-users
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 11:48:00AM +0300, Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users wrote: > Nevertheless, auto-reload is a bad idea, because configuration > might be in inconsistent state during edition, with split-config > its probability is much more higher then with monolitic one. Only > admin

Re: [exim] Configuring exim to use an non-TLS connection to port 587.

2023-04-11 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
On 11/04/2023 17:43, Peter via Exim-users wrote: Hello again, In absence of progress to have exim apply TLS-on-connect to server port 465 I'm trying non-TLS to port 587 as a simpler first objective.  =8~/ Configuration specifications of the server are here.

Re: [exim] Configuring exim to use an non-TLS connection to port 587.

2023-04-11 Thread Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 06:56:10PM +0100, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote: >20:33:41 1656 failed to expand "<; ${if > exists{/etc/exim4/passwd.client} > {${lookup{$host}nwildlsearch{/etc/exim4/passwd.client}{$host_address}}}{} }" > while checking a list: failed to open

Re: [exim] Configuring exim to use an non-TLS connection to port 587.

2023-04-11 Thread Graeme Fowler via Exim-users
On 11 Apr 2023, at 17:43, Peter via Exim-users wrote: > In absence of progress to have exim apply TLS-on-connect to server port > 465 I'm trying non-TLS to port 587 as a simpler first objective. =8~/ Your error has nothing to do with TLS at all: 20:33:41 1656 LOG: MAIN PANIC 20:33:41 1656

[exim] Configuring exim to use an non-TLS connection to port 587.

2023-04-11 Thread Peter via Exim-users
Hello again, In absence of progress to have exim apply TLS-on-connect to server port 465 I'm trying non-TLS to port 587 as a simpler first objective. =8~/ Configuration specifications of the server are here. https://islandhosting.com/knowledgebase/21/How-do-I-configure-my-email-client.html

[exim] Monolithic vs. multi-file configuration; was, Re(n): Configuring ...

2023-04-11 Thread Peter via Exim-users
Odhiambo, Slavko & all, 2023-04-10 22:57:49 UTC Odhiambo Washington wrote in exim-users, I always blow away the Debian split config for my own monolithic one. See everything in one place. 2023-04-10 22:57:49 UTC Slavko wrote in exim-users, I do it opposite and i use that split style in many

[exim] Exim and Sympa, more like a philosophical question...

2023-04-11 Thread Marco Gaiarin via Exim-users
Currently i use an (old) exim configuration for sympa, where i've setup only one transport: sympa_transport: debug_print = "T: sympa_transport for $local_part@$domain" driver = pipe current_directory = /var/lib/sympa home_directory = /var/lib/sympa envelope_to_add

Re: [exim] Re (2): Syntactic validity of configuration.

2023-04-11 Thread Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 9:59 AM Slavko via Exim-users wrote: > Dňa 10. apríla 2023 22:57:49 UTC používateľ Odhiambo Washington via > Exim-users napísal: > > >For me I am okay. I always blow away the Debian split config for my own > >monolithic one. > > I do it opposite and i use that split

Re: [exim] Re (2): Syntactic validity of configuration.

2023-04-11 Thread Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 10:04:49AM +0200, Slavko via Exim-users wrote: > Dňa Tue, 11 Apr 2023 08:39:30 +0100 Jeremy Harris via Exim-users > napísal: > > > On 11/04/2023 07:44, Slavko via Exim-users wrote: > > > The only downside with exim is, that this split (as implemented > > > in debian) is

Re: [exim] Re (2): Syntactic validity of configuration.

2023-04-11 Thread Slavko via Exim-users
Ahoj, Dňa Tue, 11 Apr 2023 08:39:30 +0100 Jeremy Harris via Exim-users napísal: > On 11/04/2023 07:44, Slavko via Exim-users wrote: > > The only downside with exim is, that this split (as implemented > > in debian) is not directly supported by exim, and one have to > > reload exim even to test

Re: [exim] Re (2): Syntactic validity of configuration.

2023-04-11 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
On 11/04/2023 07:44, Slavko via Exim-users wrote: The only downside with exim is, that this split (as implemented in debian) is not directly supported by exim, and one have to reload exim even to test it, but on other side, at least i do not forget to reload it after changes ;-) Possible

Re: [exim] Re (2): Syntactic validity of configuration.

2023-04-11 Thread Slavko via Exim-users
Dňa 10. apríla 2023 22:57:49 UTC používateľ Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users napísal: >For me I am okay. I always blow away the Debian split config for my own >monolithic one. I do it opposite and i use that split style in many other daemons, including eg. sshd, dovecot, nginx, uwsgi,